OFFICIAL Wests Tigers Unite: Call to Arms

Status
Not open for further replies.
Can anyone please remind me what these 3 were supposed to have done to cause such grave offence?
I think called somebody Darl and somebody else a softy or something similar. I also think Rick told Denny and his partner they were in the wrong corporate box.

Perhaps they should have done some lines and run into an innocent motorist to get a more lenient sentence.
 
It’s a design feature in order to perpetuate certain values.

Club was founded this way.

Business wise it is far more successful than others have been who supposedly promoted candidates on a subjective meritocracy.
The business is going great, but these numpties don't know jack about running a football club. We've got 3 wooden spoons and 3 finals appearances in 25 years to prove that.

Let them do what they're good at and run the leagues clubs, but let people who know rugby league run the Wests Tigers.
 
Souths were a mess for years before being bailed out by two millionaires. And even just before Crowe and Holmes a Court bought the club, there were factions in the club, lead by George Piggins who were opposed to it. I remember there having to be a vote or something like that to allow them to actually buy it. If that hadn’t gone through, Souths would still be the joke of the competition. It’s going to take something similar to pull us out of the mire.
 
Souths were a mess for years before being bailed out by two millionaires. And even just before Crowe and Holmes a Court bought the club, there were factions in the club, lead by George Piggins who were opposed to it. I remember there having to be a vote or something like that to allow them to actually buy it. If that hadn’t gone through, Souths would still be the joke of the competition. It’s going to take something similar to pull us out of the mire.
They had voting members with equal rights

From memory I think they needed 75% to agree to the change of ownership
 
They had voting members with equal rights

From memory I think they needed 75% to agree to the change of ownership

didn’t the members of Wests and Balmain have to vote to approve the merger back in 1999? Why didn’t the debenture holders just vote on behalf of Wests ?
 
The business is going great, but these numpties don't know jack about running a football club. We've got 3 wooden spoons and 3 finals appearances in 25 years to prove that.

Let them do what they're good at and run the leagues clubs, but let people who know rugby league run the Wests Tigers.
Who?
 
It’s a design feature in order to perpetuate certain values.

Club was founded this way.

Business wise it is far more successful than others have been who supposedly promoted candidates on a subjective meritocracy.

Business booming brother
 
It’s a design feature in order to perpetuate certain values.

Club was founded this way.

Business wise it is far more successful than others have been who supposedly promoted candidates on a subjective meritocracy.
They've collected pokies revenue well after finding themselves in an area with a large gambling demographic. Don't translate that to a successful board.

How do you think their significant asset in WT has performed over the last decade? The opportunity cost this board has squandered is large.
 
Be interested in Richo’s response to all of this shit when he returns to work next week
As if Richo will tell us. WTFU. Even non members get news before members yet they are promised in their membership. Its like saying Donald Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon runs the planet. Its deep. A deep deep state we're in. Rexy
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Back
Top