Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion

balmain boy said:
Cmon, even at half pace he still blew those two away.

Once the likes of Twal and Seyfarth are 17-21 on the roster, and Sukkar is 30-34, then we might actually have a decent pack.
Click to expand...
I can’t disagree with that and I think most of our supporters unanimously agree.
Maybe a bit harsh on a young up and comer such as Sukkar who does have scope for plenty of improvement, but he certainly doesn’t look like he’s ready to make a genuine impact at NRL level just yet.
 
Vicious said:
I think you are missing the point that our defence in particular lacks line speed and lacks aggression due to having a forward pack full of players that make tackles only because they have to, but no intention to hurt the opposition or make a difference.
Ray Stone alone will not make a world of difference, but a player like him could be the starting point in signing a few players who do defend with intent and aggression.
If we were to sign him, I would play him at 9 for the first 20 mins of each game before bringing Api on once the heat of the battle has settled and we would then have the option of using Stone as a 13 and he would likely only play 40-50mins each game just for his aggression factor alone.
As I say we need more aggressive defenders than just him, but he’d be a start and maybe a few of our current players would find the courage to show a bit of line speed and hit a bit harder from playing alongside him.
Click to expand...
Spot on, we have a pack of workhorses, guys that will make 30 tackles a game but noone with any mongrel and aggression. I wish we could get 2 forwards who took it personally every week. Went out intentionally to bend the line back and snap the blokes they're tackling. Personally I think Sayfarth and Twal have hit their ceiling. There's no improvement left in them, this is as good as they're getting. We need to be in a position where they are no 25 - 30 on the depth chart then were flying. Atm they're 10 - 15. Lots of work to be done on the squad.
 
liltiger said:
Spot on, we have a pack of workhorses, guys that will make 30 tackles a game but noone with any mongrel and aggression. I wish we could get 2 forwards who took it personally every week. Went out intentionally to bend the line back and snap the blokes they're tackling. Personally I think Sayfarth and Twal have hit their ceiling. There's no improvement left in them, this is as good as they're getting. We need to be in a position where they are no 25 - 30 on the depth chart then were flying. Atm they're 10 - 15. Lots of work to be done on the squad.
Click to expand...

18-22 is fine … they will still end up playing 10+ games a year
 
Tom Shines said:
Well … it should be right? How is the team going to improve otherwise …?

They only need 2 more forwards realistically…
Click to expand...
Yes the addition of 2 more NRL quality forwards would solve our issues in the forwards.
I think we have a few issues in the backs also.
There are a few players still currently available for 2026 that could help solve those issues too.
 
liltiger said:
Imo, I'm telling Hodgo thanks but time to leave, bring Cronk in to work on our attack, then bringing in Matty Johns. The guy is a clown but has on of the best football I.q running around. If I can't get him in to help the halves I'm calling his brother in. Joey has done some really good work with developing halves and their games.
Click to expand...
problem is i don’t think the club wants to pay their wages
 
Vicious said:
Sone very good points you raise.
That along with the fascination to play injured players who only let us down while playing injured is mind boggling.
Click to expand...
This x100. Imo it's obvious To'a, Skelton, Fainu and Pole are playing injured or being hampered by recovering injuries. I never understood shifting 5 players around to fill 2 holes when you could just go and replace like for like from reserve grade, if we never use them what's the point of having a reserve grade squad. Some of the guys won't be up for it so a bad game or 2 is expected, but imo it's infinitely better than constantly fielding injured or hampered players who as we've seen regress in form because they're struggling and just cannot perform. By bringing guys up so the injured players can recover, we expose our reserve grade squad to NRL level football, get the guys exposure to it, letting it bleed to the lower grades and it shows the other reserve grade players there is a path to first grade if they put in.
 
Vicious said:
Yes the addition of 2 more NRL quality forwards would solve our issues in the forwards.
I think we have a few issues in the backs also.
There are a few players still currently available for 2026 that could help solve those issues too.
Click to expand...

I’m starting to wonder about Toa … they’ll need to make a call soon about retaining him… it looks like he is playing busted which is not doing either the team or him any good … this is like what I was saying earlier … they would rather play him busted because they don’t have any faith that the likes of Naden can fill in adequately for him
 
crazycat said:
Why the hell haven't our coaches addressed this?

Benji seems to be very much into the "fast footy" gameplan of Sheens and you look at his squad he is actually improving on Sheen's plan....

So why the slow line speed? We have a fast-ish team. Are there slow pokes in the line and Benji is trying to get us to hold the line?? That I would get as we need the line to move together so that gaps don't form... but we need to be quick into the opposition else they get room to move and plan. We had this sorted at the start of the year.

Far too much experimentation going on. Keep it simple.
Click to expand...
We have the slowest team in the comp, by a long way. Not oneu are they slow, they're unfit, so can't sprinted more than a couple of times a game either.
The only reason in can gather for our lack of line speed is we're conserving energy as we're not fit enough to play the 80.
Grounds for dismissal really. A lack of pace is on the recruitment team, a lack of fitness is on everyone. Coaches have no excuse
 
liltiger said:
This x100. Imo it's obvious To'a, Skelton, Fainu and Pole are playing injured or being hampered by recovering injuries. I never understood shifting 5 players around to fill 2 holes when you could just go and replace like for like from reserve grade, if we never use them what's the point of having a reserve grade squad. Some of the guys won't be up for it so a bad game or 2 is expected, but imo it's infinitely better than constantly fielding injured or hampered players who as we've seen regress in form because they're struggling and just cannot perform. By bringing guys up so the injured players can recover, we expose our reserve grade squad to NRL level football, get the guys exposure to it, letting it bleed to the lower grades and it shows the other reserve grade players there is a path to first grade if they put in.
Click to expand...
the problem is there isn’t a like for like in reserve grade, that’s the entire issue
as a coach you need to trust what you’re fielding & unfortunately our injured FG players are still better than what’s below
the club has 0 depth & benji/richo already know that, that’s what’s next for the club to improve
 
liltiger said:
Preferably a bit lower Tom that'll mean the squad is in much better shape than it is now
Click to expand...

I hear you mate … but realistically they probably only bringing in 3 new forwards to the team this off-season so there is only so far they can be pushed down … if it’s more than great 😊
 
liltiger said:
This x100. Imo it's obvious To'a, Skelton, Fainu and Pole are playing injured or being hampered by recovering injuries. I never understood shifting 5 players around to fill 2 holes when you could just go and replace like for like from reserve grade, if we never use them what's the point of having a reserve grade squad. Some of the guys won't be up for it so a bad game or 2 is expected, but imo it's infinitely better than constantly fielding injured or hampered players who as we've seen regress in form because they're struggling and just cannot perform. By bringing guys up so the injured players can recover, we expose our reserve grade squad to NRL level football, get the guys exposure to it, letting it bleed to the lower grades and it shows the other reserve grade players there is a path to first grade if they put in.
Click to expand...
💯 there has been plenty of players who have went surprisingly better than expected when given an NRL opportunity over the years.
Either way it’s certainly no good to us as a team when continually playing injured players who are playing extremely poorly because of it.
 
gregjm87 said:
Disagree that it has to be (certainly could be). I think defensive coaching and ability are a big factor. Not that they aren't told to get off the line but they lose the collision and wrestle, meaning slow to get back to the line, meaning slow to get off it.
Click to expand...
Agree.
Ability is massive - but for whatever reason is deprioritised as the key element determining selection.

Fitness can be raised.

Look, there are lots of fit people. It doesn't make them all capable of doing the job.

All trees are green. But not all green things are trees.
 
tigahhh said:
the problem is there isn’t a like for like in reserve grade, that’s the entire issue
as a coach you need to trust what you’re fielding & unfortunately our injured FG players are still better than what’s below
Click to expand...
I'm completely the opposite, throw them in the deep end, were not winning the comp this year, give them the exposure and experience.
 
Tom Shines said:
I’m starting to wonder about Toa … they’ll need to make a call soon about retaining him… it looks like he is playing busted which is not doing either the team or him any good … this is like what I was saying earlier … they would rather play him busted because they don’t have any faith that the likes of Naden can fill in adequately for him
Click to expand...
Even Naden on a bad day is better than what To’a has dished up over the past 5-6 weeks.
If they are insistent about not playing Naden then surely Mapapalangi or Luke Laulilli should be the next centre up,
As for Skelton playing injured, why drop Staines after one bad game and 4 very good games if that is the case ?
 
Vicious said:
That is close to the mark, but in addition to this we still have a massive issue in lack of creativity within our spine, an extremely poor kicking game and poor work ethic defensively.
How do we fix those problems ?
Click to expand...
We show them tapes of the Bulldogs game over and over until they replicate that on the field
 
Vicious said:
Even Naden on a bad day is better than what To’a has dished up over the past 5-6 weeks.
If they are insistent about not playing Naden then surely Mapapalangi or Luke Laulilli should be the next centre up,
As for Skelton playing injured, why drop Staines after one bad game and 4 very good games if that is the case ?
Click to expand...

Can’t answer about Toa …it’s surprised me for weeks now they keep picking him …his poor form is likely costing him money on his next contract

Charlie had a really poor game against the Titans …I like Luke L … maybe they were just a bit worried that Penrith would target and exploit him under the high kicks
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Members online

Total: 1,023 (members: 14, guests: 1,009)
Back
Top