$50 Million reason Wests Tigers are prepared to quit Campbelltown.

as we have seen from the last ceo that ran the joint not every decision made is a good one
Look, every good CEO will make mistakes.

Easts seem to be doing rather well. Yet they let go Terrell May.
I am 100% sure they are still spitting chips on that move. Bad move and I hate the Chooks. Yet I am not going to deny that their team is making the 8 with all the noise around DCE and punting 2 star centers. I think they are managing well (perhaps without cap restrictions) even though they made a dumb move in letting May go.

I am also a Campbelltown boy. I just love the area, sure strugglers but nice people.
The heart of NRL is going to be in the 'burbs. So many people I know are moving out because they can't afford places near the center of sydney. It won't be Epping or dare I say Leichheart where your going to see a stack of kids lace up for NRL.

Yes even if there are kids there, they will be playing Union at the private schools. I mean there will be some talent, and Easts/Dogs/Manly/Sharks/Souths will be vying for them.

Now we did not have to say "YES" to C'town... but If we say NO to C'town (or Macarthur/further out), we would have to make our base in the Blue Mountains and compete with Penrith, North coast and compete with Manly or start talking WA/SA/elsewhere.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BZN
Your 10% numbers are from this facebook post and I cannot find an official statistical source to verify where this came from.

My numbers are from here which is a government issued document which says the estimate is around 4%.

This report states a total 206,000 people of pacific islands ancenstry in all of Australia in 2019...the government seems to obscure ethinicity statistics these days so it's the best info available.

Indians are around 850k in all of Australia as a reference.

Anyway...looks like people have resorted to facebook posts, opinions and anecdotes which says a lot.
It's not a facebook post, it's an NRL press release which should be a somewhat reliable source. Yeah there isn't any actual citation to where the number came from, but I'd assume the NRL would be able to source government statistical information relating to ancestry for strategical development reasons. However, based on what I've personally seen in ABS records relating to Campbelltown ancestries the 10% figure does seem slightly high but the article doesn't exactly mention specifically what areas are involved in this figure other than "campbelltown heartland" so could be including all areas in the junior catchment area but even still this figure would be most likely be too high.

I also read your document and pulled this out on page 66
Pacific people account for 1.3% of the NSW population, composed mainly of individuals of Tongan, Fijian, Samoan, Cook Islanders, and Maori descent(11). The largest population of Pacific people reside in Campbelltown LGA(12)
This on page 10 (Note: SWSLHD refers to Campbelltown, Camden, Bankstown, Liverpool, Fairfield, Wollondilly, Wingecarribee)
SWSLHD is home to one of the largest populations (33%) of Pacific communities in NSW
followed by this on page 7
This report shows that in SWSLHD, the three highest Pacific ethnic groups in terms of population size are Fijians, Samoans and Tongans, a quarter of whom reside in the Campbelltown local government area (LGA) (26%)
meaning that approximately (as this only includes the 3 biggest Pacific Island groups) 8.58% of the NSW Pacific Islander population resides in Campbelltown. Which is pretty significant given Campbelltown represented 2.12% of the NSW population overall.

Additionally, Table 14 of page 23 shows there are 4,588 Samoan and 1,731 Maori heritage individuals in the Campbelltown LGA as of 2016. Based on 2021 Census data there are now 5,299 Samoans and 2,040 people of Maori heritage which is a 15.5% growth in Samoan and 17.9% growth in Maori ancestries over 5 years. As a comparison Indians grew 23.3% which is hardly that much more (2016 data here).

Page 66 also had this
It is a youthful population with majority of the Pacific Community being under 25 years of age, compared to majority of Australians being between the ages of 25 to 49 years
Seems like not only are there lots of Pacific Islander people in the Campbelltown area, but a large proportion of them are also children. Well wouldn't that be handy for someone trying to establish a team in the South-West given 52% of NRL players have Pasifika heritage.
 
??! I used to play for the Two Blues . They recruit around the whole western suburbs districts , funded via the leagues club. In my age group all the best players went there . There and Guildford . Both with grounds backing into leagues clubs.
I don’t recall ever having played with Vietnamese player . It was until I was much older that i recall playing with a Vietnamese guy. .
That’s not much of an argument . Not too many locals to Cabramatta playing there .
Now I know why you are so often grumpy 😉, you've probably been hit around the head too many times.
🤔 You should sue for that.
 
Look, every good CEO will make mistakes.

Easts seem to be doing rather well. Yet they let go Terrell May.
I am 100% sure they are still spitting chips on that move. Bad move and I hate the Chooks. Yet I am not going to deny that their team is making the 8 with all the noise around DCE and punting 2 star centers. I think they are managing well (perhaps without cap restrictions) even though they made a dumb move in letting May go.

I am also a Campbelltown boy. I just love the area, sure strugglers but nice people.
The heart of NRL is going to be in the 'burbs. So many people I know are moving out because they can't afford places near the center of sydney. It won't be Epping or dare I say Leichheart where your going to see a stack of kids lace up for NRL.

Yes even if there are kids there, they will be playing Union at the private schools. I mean there will be some talent, and Easts/Dogs/Manly/Sharks/Souths will be vying for them.

Now we did not have to say "YES" to C'town... but If we say NO to C'town (or Macarthur/further out), we would have to make our base in the Blue Mountains and compete with Penrith, North coast and compete with Manly or start talking WA/SA/elsewhere.
Great post CC, and good onyuh for sticking up for the people out there.
But I think there is little chance of WT's moving to Macarthur/further out as you suggested.
And having a high Polynesian population, I can see a fanatical fan base for WT's.
 
It's not a facebook post, it's an NRL press release which should be a somewhat reliable source. Yeah there isn't any actual citation to where the number came from, but I'd assume the NRL would be able to source government statistical information relating to ancestry for strategical development reasons. However, based on what I've personally seen in ABS records relating to Campbelltown ancestries the 10% figure does seem slightly high but the article doesn't exactly mention specifically what areas are involved in this figure other than "campbelltown heartland" so could be including all areas in the junior catchment area but even still this figure would be most likely be too high.

I also read your document and pulled this out on page 66

This on page 10 (Note: SWSLHD refers to Campbelltown, Camden, Bankstown, Liverpool, Fairfield, Wollondilly, Wingecarribee)

followed by this on page 7

meaning that approximately (as this only includes the 3 biggest Pacific Island groups) 8.58% of the NSW Pacific Islander population resides in Campbelltown. Which is pretty significant given Campbelltown represented 2.12% of the NSW population overall.

Additionally, Table 14 of page 23 shows there are 4,588 Samoan and 1,731 Maori heritage individuals in the Campbelltown LGA as of 2016. Based on 2021 Census data there are now 5,299 Samoans and 2,040 people of Maori heritage which is a 15.5% growth in Samoan and 17.9% growth in Maori ancestries over 5 years. As a comparison Indians grew 23.3% which is hardly that much more (2016 data here).

Page 66 also had this

Seems like not only are there lots of Pacific Islander people in the Campbelltown area, but a large proportion of them are also children. Well wouldn't that be handy for someone trying to establish a team in the South-West given 52% of NRL players have Pasifika heritage.
As @gallagher said in reply to @TheEnz only a few posts back... "bravo 👏👏 👏" and the same to you for this post Charred.
Good quality well written facts like yours beat other posters cheap shots every time.
 
Last edited:
It's not a facebook post, it's an NRL press release which should be a somewhat reliable source. Yeah there isn't any actual citation to where the number came from, but I'd assume the NRL would be able to source government statistical information relating to ancestry for strategical development reasons. However, based on what I've personally seen in ABS records relating to Campbelltown ancestries the 10% figure does seem slightly high but the article doesn't exactly mention specifically what areas are involved in this figure other than "campbelltown heartland" so could be including all areas in the junior catchment area but even still this figure would be most likely be too high.

I also read your document and pulled this out on page 66

This on page 10 (Note: SWSLHD refers to Campbelltown, Camden, Bankstown, Liverpool, Fairfield, Wollondilly, Wingecarribee)

followed by this on page 7

meaning that approximately (as this only includes the 3 biggest Pacific Island groups) 8.58% of the NSW Pacific Islander population resides in Campbelltown. Which is pretty significant given Campbelltown represented 2.12% of the NSW population overall.

Additionally, Table 14 of page 23 shows there are 4,588 Samoan and 1,731 Maori heritage individuals in the Campbelltown LGA as of 2016. Based on 2021 Census data there are now 5,299 Samoans and 2,040 people of Maori heritage which is a 15.5% growth in Samoan and 17.9% growth in Maori ancestries over 5 years. As a comparison Indians grew 23.3% which is hardly that much more (2016 data here).

Page 66 also had this

Seems like not only are there lots of Pacific Islander people in the Campbelltown area, but a large proportion of them are also children. Well wouldn't that be handy for someone trying to establish a team in the South-West given 52% of NRL players have Pasifika heritage.
This is a dishonest assessment. Firstly I didn't say anything about South West pacific population. I referred to Campbelltown. 33% sounds high until you look atvthe totals. Growth of 15% on 20,000 people is far less than growth on 100,000 people...my pointbwas always the demographic you are chasing is a tiny minority.

Let's get the numbers right. 9,078 males and 10,253 females in the SWLHD of Pacific heritage. Page 16.

If we are moving more games to Campbelltown simply to capture this extra 20,000 people (even though we already play fames there) and believe they will grow into a huge supporter base then at least make the argument that way. It seems to be what you're saying.

Now please slice the numbers to exclude non league fans and people that don't support the club at all. What exactly are we aiming at?

Because the initial discussion was around Indians, Filipinos and Chinese taking up league in droves as supporters...these groups make up the vast majority of South West. Not Pacific Islanders.
 
This is a dishonest assessment. Firstly I didn't say anything about South West pacific population. I referred to Campbelltown. 33% sounds high until you look atvthe totals. Growth of 15% on 20,000 people is far less than growth on 100,000 people...my pointbwas always the demographic you are chasing is a tiny minority.

Let's get the numbers right. 9,078 males and 10,253 females in the SWLHD of Pacific heritage. Page 16.

If we are moving more games to Campbelltown simply to capture this extra 20,000 people (even though we already play fames there) and believe they will grow into a huge supporter base then at least make the argument that way. It seems to be what you're saying.

Now please slice the numbers to exclude non league fans and people that don't support the club at all. What exactly are we aiming at?

Because the initial discussion was around Indians, Filipinos and Chinese taking up league in droves as supporters...these groups make up the vast majority of South West. Not Pacific Islanders.
Only ONE section involves me talking about south west sydney as a whole in which I subsequently linked Campbelltown LGA to that specific point. My entire post literally revolved around the Campbelltown LGA, tell me how it dishonestly didn't do that? You were also the one to link a document talking about the SWSLHD.

To your second point. You do know the number you are referencing is South West area not Campbelltown? I thought you wanted to talk about Campbelltown? Secondly, you clearly haven't read the document correctly, but also the document doesn't make much sense in this area. But below is the real number you should be looking at for SWSLHD
A total of 28,152 of people in SWSLHD reported Pacific community ancestry in the 2016 Census
You can see the contradiction here on page 15
There are 139,173 Pacific people born in Australia, of whom 59,010 were resident inNSW and 19,346 were resident in SWSLHD (Table 2).
Table 2: Number of Pacific people by country of birth, SWSLHD, 2016
Table 2 is meant to show the pacific people born in Australia by shows them by country of birth.

Anyway there is no point dwelling on what that outdated document said, because I have gone to the ABS and made some tables using the census data from 2021 (Note: Participants were allowed to select up to 2 ancestries)

In the Campbelltown LGA there are: 12,528 Pacific Islanders (excl. Hawaiians). The largest groups being Samoa 5299, Maori 2040, Fiji 1878, Tonga 1822 which make up 88% altogether (these are countries/ancestries with typically greater presence in NRL).
Also in Campbelltown there are: 2047 Vietnamese, 6052 Chinese, 4858 Nepalese, 2722 Pakistanis, 10590 Indians, 5670 Bangladeshis and 7190 Filipinos. All of them are smaller than the total Pacific Islander conglomerate (and don't say blah blah grouped together as I think combined all these nations would have a substantially lower population than any other country listed, (2.5million compared to 29 million from Nepal)).
Additionally, these population groups (incl. Pasifika) combine to make 51,657 out of 176,519 people or 29.3%. So much for "Indians, Filipinos and Chinese ... [making] up the vast majority of the South West" when they only take up 13.5% of the population.

Now we have Campbelltown out of the way let's extend this (PS, this "catchment information" was sourced from here).

Wests Catchment
Camden - Total 119,315, Pasifika 3,116 (2.6%), Vietnamese 872 (0.7%), Chinese 2808 (2.3%), Nepalese 1100 (0.9%), Pakistani 931 (0.8%), Indian 4860 (4.1%), Bangladesh 656 (0.5%), Filipino 2645 (2.2%)
Liverpool - Total 233,446 , Pasifika 10,669 (4.6%), Vietnamese 12,736 (5.5%), Chinese 12697 (5.5%), Nepalese 2314 (1%), Pakistani 3140 (1.3%), Indian 14033 (6%), Bangaldeshi 1392 (0.6%), Filipino 6688 (2.9%)
Wollondilly - Total 53961, Pasifika 477 (0.9%), Vietnamese 98 (0.2%), Chinese 425 (0.8%), Nepalese 11 (0.02%), Pakistani 36 (0.07%), Indian 222 (0.4%), Bangladeshi 14 (0.02%), Filipino 272 (0.5%)
Balmain Catchment
Inner West - Total 182,818, Pasifika 2060 (1.1%), Vietnamese 4345 (2.4%), Chinese 15,463 (8.5%), Nepalese 2059 (1.1%), Pakistani 218 (0.1%), Indian 3544 (1.9%), Bangladeshi 246 (0.1%), Filipino 3290 (1.8%).
Canada Bay - Total 89,177, Pasifika 674 (0.8%), Vietnamese 1299 (1.5%), Chinese 14,453 (16.2%), Nepalese 1084 (1.2%), Pakistani 215 (0.2%), Indian 3032 (3.3%), Bangladeshi 99 (0.1%), Filipino 1483 (1.3%).
Burwood - Total 40,217, Pasifika 369 (0.9%), Vietnamese 1141 (2.8%), Chinese 13,193 (32.8%), Nepalese 2964 (7.4%), Pakistani 94 (0.2%), Indian 1450 (3.6%), Bangladeshi 71 (0.2%), Filipino 745 (1.9%)
Strathfield - Total 45,593, Pasifika 549 (1.2%), Vietnamese 1417 (3.1%), Chinese 9756 (21.4%), Nepalese 3145 (6.9%), Pakistani 371 (0.8%), Indian 5005 (10.9%), Bangladeshi 222 (0.5%), Filipino 871 (1.9%)
Ryde - Total 129,923, Pasifika 939 (0.7%), Vietnamese 1571 (1.2%), Chinese 33,744 (26%), Nepalese 830 (0.6%), Pakistani 671 (0.5%), Indian 6194 (4.8%), Bangladeshi 510 (0.4%), Filipino 3575 (2.8%)

So I think it's plainly clear to pretty much anyone that if Indian/Chinese/Filipino/Nepalese etc. etc. descended persons are not gonna be footy fans or whatever then CLEARLY we should play at Campbelltown instead of Leichhardt right? I mean if you are going to complain that all the new immigrants to the Campbelltown area from these Asians countries mean our supporter base will be non-existent/not grow then why does is it ok that the LGA's surrounding Leichhardt have significantly higher proportions of Asian descended persons?

Now we will look at some more "rugby league friendly ancestries" (in addition to Pasifika we've already seen). Australian, Uk based ancestries (+ Ireland), Indigenous (Aboriginal + Torrest Strait Islander), New Zealander and Lebanese to see if that has any bearing on anything.

Wests Catchment
Campbelltown - Total 176,519, Australian 43804 (24.8%), Indigenous 7093 (4%), NZ 1282 (0.7%), UK+Ire 59392 (33.6%), Lebanese 4168 (2.4%)
Camden - Total 119,315, Australian 39041 (32.7%), Indigenous 3845 (3.2%), NZ 893 (0.7%), UK+Ire 52236 (43.8%), Lebanese 2234 (1.9%)
Liverpool - Total 233,446, Australian 36374 (15.6%), Indigenous 3883 (1.7%), NZ 927 (0.4%), UK+Ire 40758 (17.4%), Lebanese 13,883 (5.9%)
Wollondilly - Total 53961, Australian 23486 (43.5%), Indigenous 2397 (4.4%), NZ 388 (0.7%), UK+Ire 32136 (59.6%), Lebanese 551 (1%)
Balmain Catchment
Inner West - Total 182,818, Australian 44681 (24.4%), Indigenous 2248 (1.2%), NZ 1883 (1%), UK+Ire 99,053 (54.2%), Lebanese 3373 (1.8%)
Canada Bay - Total 89,177, Australian 15,723 (17,6%), Indigenous 557 (0.6%), NZ 530 (0.6%), UK+Ire 29,950 (33.6%), Lebanese 2484 (2.8%)
Burwood - Total 40,217, Australian 3853 (10%), Indigenous 195 (0.5%), NZ 123 (0.3%), UK+Ire 7213 (17.9%), Lebanese 1722 (4.3%)
Strathfield - Total 45,593, Australian 3757 (8.2%), Indigenous 252 (0.6%), NZ 81 (0.2%), UK+Ire 6394 (14%), Lebanese 2684 (5.9%)
Ryde - Total 129,923, Australian 20800 (16%), Indigenous 676 (0.5%), NZ 670 (0.5%), UK+Ire 36377 (28%), Lebanese 2341 (1.8%)

Seems pretty clear cut to me out of Campbelltown or Balmain which one has the more potential for future players or fans. Not to mention that the Inner West (LGA where Leichhardt Oval is located) population grew by less than 800 people in 5 years between 2016 and 2021. That's 0.4% over 5 years while Campbelltown grew by over 18,000 which is 11.4% over 5 years or 28.5x greater than the Inner West.

PS. I'm not a Magpies fan or a Balmain fan. I have never gone for either team only Wests Tigers, nor have I ever lived in either catchment area, nor did any of my parents/grandparents/uncles/aunts/cousins/siblings/friends go for either team. I am a pure Wests tigers fan and given that the significant growth of the South-West area, especially considering the development of Australia's first city in a century, Bradfield, being located a 25 minute drive NW of Campbelltown Stadium it makes a whole lot of sense to ensure we are developing the South-West. To be clear, I believe in a 6-4/7-4 stadium split because Leichhardt is still incredibly important to the Tigers DNA but emphasis must be placed on the South West for long-term performance both on and off the field.
 
Only ONE section involves me talking about south west sydney as a whole in which I subsequently linked Campbelltown LGA to that specific point. My entire post literally revolved around the Campbelltown LGA, tell me how it dishonestly didn't do that? You were also the one to link a document talking about the SWSLHD.

To your second point. You do know the number you are referencing is South West area not Campbelltown? I thought you wanted to talk about Campbelltown? Secondly, you clearly haven't read the document correctly, but also the document doesn't make much sense in this area. But below is the real number you should be looking at for SWSLHD

You can see the contradiction here on page 15


Table 2 is meant to show the pacific people born in Australia by shows them by country of birth.

Anyway there is no point dwelling on what that outdated document said, because I have gone to the ABS and made some tables using the census data from 2021 (Note: Participants were allowed to select up to 2 ancestries)

In the Campbelltown LGA there are: 12,528 Pacific Islanders (excl. Hawaiians). The largest groups being Samoa 5299, Maori 2040, Fiji 1878, Tonga 1822 which make up 88% altogether (these are countries/ancestries with typically greater presence in NRL).
Also in Campbelltown there are: 2047 Vietnamese, 6052 Chinese, 4858 Nepalese, 2722 Pakistanis, 10590 Indians, 5670 Bangladeshis and 7190 Filipinos. All of them are smaller than the total Pacific Islander conglomerate (and don't say blah blah grouped together as I think combined all these nations would have a substantially lower population than any other country listed, (2.5million compared to 29 million from Nepal)).
Additionally, these population groups (incl. Pasifika) combine to make 51,657 out of 176,519 people or 29.3%. So much for "Indians, Filipinos and Chinese ... [making] up the vast majority of the South West" when they only take up 13.5% of the population.

Now we have Campbelltown out of the way let's extend this (PS, this "catchment information" was sourced from here).

Wests Catchment
Camden - Total 119,315, Pasifika 3,116 (2.6%), Vietnamese 872 (0.7%), Chinese 2808 (2.3%), Nepalese 1100 (0.9%), Pakistani 931 (0.8%), Indian 4860 (4.1%), Bangladesh 656 (0.5%), Filipino 2645 (2.2%)
Liverpool - Total 233,446 , Pasifika 10,669 (4.6%), Vietnamese 12,736 (5.5%), Chinese 12697 (5.5%), Nepalese 2314 (1%), Pakistani 3140 (1.3%), Indian 14033 (6%), Bangaldeshi 1392 (0.6%), Filipino 6688 (2.9%)
Wollondilly - Total 53961, Pasifika 477 (0.9%), Vietnamese 98 (0.2%), Chinese 425 (0.8%), Nepalese 11 (0.02%), Pakistani 36 (0.07%), Indian 222 (0.4%), Bangladeshi 14 (0.02%), Filipino 272 (0.5%)
Balmain Catchment
Inner West - Total 182,818, Pasifika 2060 (1.1%), Vietnamese 4345 (2.4%), Chinese 15,463 (8.5%), Nepalese 2059 (1.1%), Pakistani 218 (0.1%), Indian 3544 (1.9%), Bangladeshi 246 (0.1%), Filipino 3290 (1.8%).
Canada Bay - Total 89,177, Pasifika 674 (0.8%), Vietnamese 1299 (1.5%), Chinese 14,453 (16.2%), Nepalese 1084 (1.2%), Pakistani 215 (0.2%), Indian 3032 (3.3%), Bangladeshi 99 (0.1%), Filipino 1483 (1.3%).
Burwood - Total 40,217, Pasifika 369 (0.9%), Vietnamese 1141 (2.8%), Chinese 13,193 (32.8%), Nepalese 2964 (7.4%), Pakistani 94 (0.2%), Indian 1450 (3.6%), Bangladeshi 71 (0.2%), Filipino 745 (1.9%)
Strathfield - Total 45,593, Pasifika 549 (1.2%), Vietnamese 1417 (3.1%), Chinese 9756 (21.4%), Nepalese 3145 (6.9%), Pakistani 371 (0.8%), Indian 5005 (10.9%), Bangladeshi 222 (0.5%), Filipino 871 (1.9%)
Ryde - Total 129,923, Pasifika 939 (0.7%), Vietnamese 1571 (1.2%), Chinese 33,744 (26%), Nepalese 830 (0.6%), Pakistani 671 (0.5%), Indian 6194 (4.8%), Bangladeshi 510 (0.4%), Filipino 3575 (2.8%)

So I think it's plainly clear to pretty much anyone that if Indian/Chinese/Filipino/Nepalese etc. etc. descended persons are not gonna be footy fans or whatever then CLEARLY we should play at Campbelltown instead of Leichhardt right? I mean if you are going to complain that all the new immigrants to the Campbelltown area from these Asians countries mean our supporter base will be non-existent/not grow then why does is it ok that the LGA's surrounding Leichhardt have significantly higher proportions of Asian descended persons?

Now we will look at some more "rugby league friendly ancestries" (in addition to Pasifika we've already seen). Australian, Uk based ancestries (+ Ireland), Indigenous (Aboriginal + Torrest Strait Islander), New Zealander and Lebanese to see if that has any bearing on anything.

Wests Catchment
Campbelltown - Total 176,519, Australian 43804 (24.8%), Indigenous 7093 (4%), NZ 1282 (0.7%), UK+Ire 59392 (33.6%), Lebanese 4168 (2.4%)
Camden - Total 119,315, Australian 39041 (32.7%), Indigenous 3845 (3.2%), NZ 893 (0.7%), UK+Ire 52236 (43.8%), Lebanese 2234 (1.9%)
Liverpool - Total 233,446, Australian 36374 (15.6%), Indigenous 3883 (1.7%), NZ 927 (0.4%), UK+Ire 40758 (17.4%), Lebanese 13,883 (5.9%)
Wollondilly - Total 53961, Australian 23486 (43.5%), Indigenous 2397 (4.4%), NZ 388 (0.7%), UK+Ire 32136 (59.6%), Lebanese 551 (1%)
Balmain Catchment
Inner West - Total 182,818, Australian 44681 (24.4%), Indigenous 2248 (1.2%), NZ 1883 (1%), UK+Ire 99,053 (54.2%), Lebanese 3373 (1.8%)
Canada Bay - Total 89,177, Australian 15,723 (17,6%), Indigenous 557 (0.6%), NZ 530 (0.6%), UK+Ire 29,950 (33.6%), Lebanese 2484 (2.8%)
Burwood - Total 40,217, Australian 3853 (10%), Indigenous 195 (0.5%), NZ 123 (0.3%), UK+Ire 7213 (17.9%), Lebanese 1722 (4.3%)
Strathfield - Total 45,593, Australian 3757 (8.2%), Indigenous 252 (0.6%), NZ 81 (0.2%), UK+Ire 6394 (14%), Lebanese 2684 (5.9%)
Ryde - Total 129,923, Australian 20800 (16%), Indigenous 676 (0.5%), NZ 670 (0.5%), UK+Ire 36377 (28%), Lebanese 2341 (1.8%)

Seems pretty clear cut to me out of Campbelltown or Balmain which one has the more potential for future players or fans. Not to mention that the Inner West (LGA where Leichhardt Oval is located) population grew by less than 800 people in 5 years between 2016 and 2021. That's 0.4% over 5 years while Campbelltown grew by over 18,000 which is 11.4% over 5 years or 28.5x greater than the Inner West.

PS. I'm not a Magpies fan or a Balmain fan. I have never gone for either team only Wests Tigers, nor have I ever lived in either catchment area, nor did any of my parents/grandparents/uncles/aunts/cousins/siblings/friends go for either team. I am a pure Wests tigers fan and given that the significant growth of the South-West area, especially considering the development of Australia's first city in a century, Bradfield, being located a 25 minute drive NW of Campbelltown Stadium it makes a whole lot of sense to ensure we are developing the South-West. To be clear, I believe in a 6-4/7-4 stadium split because Leichhardt is still incredibly important to the Tigers DNA but emphasis must be placed on the South West for long-term performance both on and off the field.
Whoa man...this is a bit long...you wanna be right...so ok...be right. I ain't reading all that. All good 👍
 
so if 15.9% of Australia's Islanders in NSW are parked in the the greater west ,does it mean jack unless they turn up in D 'new] house. Feet up with an uber eat is just as good ,yet cheaper
 
Look, every good CEO will make mistakes.

Easts seem to be doing rather well. Yet they let go Terrell May.
I am 100% sure they are still spitting chips on that move. Bad move and I hate the Chooks. Yet I am not going to deny that their team is making the 8 with all the noise around DCE and punting 2 star centers. I think they are managing well (perhaps without cap restrictions) even though they made a dumb move in letting May go.

I am also a Campbelltown boy. I just love the area, sure strugglers but nice people.
The heart of NRL is going to be in the 'burbs. So many people I know are moving out because they can't afford places near the center of sydney. It won't be Epping or dare I say Leichheart where your going to see a stack of kids lace up for NRL.

Yes even if there are kids there, they will be playing Union at the private schools. I mean there will be some talent, and Easts/Dogs/Manly/Sharks/Souths will be vying for them.

Now we did not have to say "YES" to C'town... but If we say NO to C'town (or Macarthur/further out), we would have to make our base in the Blue Mountains and compete with Penrith, North coast and compete with Manly or start talking WA/SA/elsewhere.

What makes you so sure Easts are regretting releasing Terrell May? 😂
 
Back
Top