Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nothing explicit; however, a subordinate board usually has guidelines set and has to act within them. If the senior board has concerns they usually have the power of veto. It is seldom used as it is a way to force conversations to be had before final decsions are made.
I can't say I've seen it written anywhere though.
No, not at all but I can see where you would have got that impression. The jerseys seemed to attract 99% positive comments and I would not be surprised they sold out.OK..misunderstood....I thought you were questioning that the jerseys had sold out
I was trying to think what motive WTs would have in saying that if it werent true
They will implode the club because of a jersey colour, that will do me. I wonder what colour they think a tiger is.✅️
According to sources with knowledge of the situation, speaking on the condition of anonymity, one issue that led the HBG board to take action was the colour scheme of next season’s Wests Tigers home jersey, which was deemed to be too gold – a traditional colour of Balmain.
Stadiums seem a more potent decisionI knew about it , but the way it was explained to me it was for huge decisions . Like where the tigers will be playing , major sponsors , replacement of key figures in the club like ceo , coach , gm ……not the colour of the jerseys
Sorry , I misinterpreted , you’re saying why are you singled out as being negative when the whole thread is …. I think cause you went after Benji. It’s not really applicable to HBG.That’s my point. No one has anything positive to say. Nor should they.
What was getting better?I can't believe this, just when you think things are getting better we go from one shit fight to another.
oh my god. read a room you clownWhat was getting better?
“Going after Benji’ is a bit harsh. All I said was it wouldn’t be the worst thing if he was sacked. And it was only in response to someone already predicting it.Sorry , I misinterpreted , you’re saying why are you singled out as being negative when the whole thread is …. I think cause you went after Benji. It’s not really applicable to HBG.
And what did you think of BZNs personal attacksI’m far from daft, I can assure you. I don’t agree with your take on it but that’s OK. But why don’t you try a response that doesn’t include a personal attack i.e the daft remark. It diminishes you.
My personal attacks are always reserved for returns of serve but I’ll spare you this time.
Personal attacks are admittance to losing the argument.oh my god. read a room you clown
we can read it we don’t need your play-by-play. we heard you to fourth time“Going after Benji’ is a bit harsh. All I said was it wouldn’t be the worst thing if he was sacked. And it was only in response to someone already predicting it.
Depends on the agreement that they formed. Sounds like HBG put a lot of catches in there.Anyone who understands corporate governance. Is this final or can the independant board push back and refuse.
No, it’s your way. You’re the only one who’s been triggered by it.we can read it we don’t need your play-by-play. we heard you to fourth time
it’s our kind way of saying STFU
Come on mate it's me your talking to now, you have been snapping at his arse all year, the club's all in on him now you need to wear it if he goes most of the roster goes tooNope. Someone said Benji might be sacked. I said that wouldn’t be the worst thing. That’s all. You painting it like I in came and shat on Benji unprompted is disingenuous.
Yes he made them and he copped plenty. I can’t recall whether he started them or returned fire and I’m sure you’d agree it’s not worth anyone’s while to trawl back to find out whether he was the instigator or the retaliator.And what did you think of BZNs personal attacks
Plenty of them, hard to miss