HBG, Independent Directors Sacked

The trolling is what got you a 2 day rest.

Simple maths, an accumulation of ⚠️ warnings.

@Suzie-Q is one of the best here and we're all fed up with the crap.
Man I am 79 yoa Followed Balmain since 1955. But the club amalgamated with Wests I follow Wests Tigers I look to tomorrow. I am not a Balmain member. The fact is that I pay membership to Wests Tigers and have no say at all in the club. I want a say. Simple.
 
Hi Suzie-Q....It's me BZN back after another relaxing 2-day suspension.
As one of the very few posters on here from the Wests Magpies side of the JV that haven't been chased away by the Balmain people, did you think I was going to start a riot for posting on here from a Magpies pov?

I'm just asking for a friend...do posters from the Wests Magpies get suspended more often than anyone else?

Anyway, I had better get back on topic.

As you know I have followed the mighty Magpies since 1963 and I'm now nearly 80 yoa.

Without doubt, what's happening currently are the darkest days since I started following footy.
But the next few days are going to be darker still.
Our JV hasn't worked and won't work while the Balmain side of the JV continue with the aggressiveness that's currently being displayed, and led by the chief head kicker and stirrer known on here as Cochise.
Going to the march?
 
The trolling is what got you a 2 day rest.

Simple maths, an accumulation of ⚠️ warnings.

@Suzie-Q is one of the best here and we're all fed up with the crap.
I have absolutely no doubt Suzie Q is one of the best on here, as is Lauren.

So, one definition of trolling is 'intentionally provoking or insulting'.
Are you saying I was intentionally provoking?...because you won't be able to produce any evidence that I had been intentionally insulting.

If you are I have to strongly disagree.
If stating my two and tuppence worth as someone from the Wests Magpies side of the JV which may be the opposite of 99% of the posters here, is judged to be 'intentionally provoking or insulting' again I strongly disagree.

What I am certain of though, is the amount and frequency of absolutely disgusting trolling containing what can only be described as outright abuse @Vicious got hit with over a long period of time.
I was so appalled by it just prior to me being banned, I sent a PM to you complaining of the treatment he was receiving.

I'm interested to know if any action was taken against the posters that were 100% trolling by being intentionally insulting.
 
Last edited:
I have absolutely no doubt Suzie Q is one of the best on here, as is Lauren.

So, one definition of trolling is 'intentionally provoking or insulting'.
Are you saying I was intentionally provoking?...because you won't be able to produce any evidence that I had been intentionally insulting.

If you are I have to strongly disagree.
If stating my two and tuppence worth as someone from the Wests Magpies side of the JV which may be the opposite of 99% of the posters here, is judged to be 'intentionally provoking or insulting' again I strongly disagree.

What I am certain of though, is the amount and frequency of absolutely disgusting trolling containing what can only be described as outright abuse @Vicious got hit with over a long period of time.
I was so appalled by it just prior to me being banned, I sent a PM to you complaining of the treatment he was receiving.

I'm interested to know if any action was taken against the posters that were 100% trolling by being intentionally insulting.
You’ve had your turn, you’ve done your worst
SELL THE CLUB AND LIFT THE CURSE!
 
I am struggling here to understand why "Sea Eagles" and NRL management is viewed as good?

Look I expected Siebold to tank the Eagles. He hasn't yet, he may when DCE leaves. (I expect he will).

Easts, would take their manager in a heartbeat as long as they did not whinge every 10 seconds. .. Is Mestrov good? Struggling to understand any logic to this.
Please no Seibold. He couldn't coach pigs to be dirty.
 
I don't know I want a fully Privatized Wests Tigers...

Cashed up owners make some sense.

But the Nathan Tinkler knights was a trainwreck.


Returning to member control is probably too steep an ask. WT members are there, but were not made of money.

I hope Richo and all those concerned can give us a structure that respects fans while making our club, stable.
It is risky, as you say if you get the wrong person in to buy the joint were back at square one. Though Richo did set Souths up prior and post privatisation and they seem to be doing OK. Richo and the N.R.L will know exactly who the Wests Tigers need in the future, I can't see the N.R.L just selling to anyone if that eventuates. Reason it's preferable is we've had 25 years of 80s boardroom garbage with no end in sight. We have no way to enact change at HBG so are at the mercy of 20 people who are irreplaceable. Privatisation is a risk that the wrong people may buy the joint, though the chances of New owners being worse than what we have are fairly slim. Whoever is buying would have the business experience and contacts so would be much more competent in owning the team than the people we have now who are there because they shelled out $100 at some point.
 

Staff online

Back
Top