HBG did implement the recommendations.
They also sacked those independent board members & the CEO for reasons that a large majority of people in here dismiss as ridiculous.
The NRL has since gifted HBG control of the board, not insisted Richo be returned & negotiated the return of 3 of the 4 ousted board members.
That's the facts that are mostly widely known.
You keep skipping over my question regarding what HBG had planned to do with the board going forward. At no point I can recall has there been any indication they DIDN'T want to continue with independent board members. Just not the ones they felt were not delivering all important details to HBG.
And, given that PVL & not the independent company that did the review, interviewed the ousted board members & HBG in the last couple of days, it could be deducted that PVL is more over the current state of things than the review company. And PVL's decision?
To go in favour of putting control with HBG.
Who knows more about what went down in the last week? PVL? Or the independent company that gave a review that was followed?
And why, with the shadow of an investigation hanging over him, was Richo not brought back in? Does that give ANY credence to the potential issues HBG were having?
I'm not saying it does. Just that it could.