Lachie was there ... ?? 🤣There was a doggies one, too
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lachie was there ... ?? 🤣There was a doggies one, too
There were definitely some competing hairdos!Lachie was there ... ?? 🤣
What?This latest flair up and sackings has nothing to do with Calvary Luai joint the Balmain under 19s does it?
"they have played a large roll"--that's different to your original claim where you just said HBG.History indicates they have played a large role.
It’s all of our shareholders and that includes a hopeless failure in Balmain. I think it’s important that is not forgotten in this. Obviously HBG are going to go on the defensive here.@Vicious I have seen you lament the clubs failings over many years often laying the boot into the clubs poor roster construction & failure to make finals. I now ask you who has overseen all of this? And under what leadership structure did all of this happen under?
Wow!!! a lot of words there dude, but most of them are b/s.Mate the dude is a fake. He has a fake and made up identity. And even that fake and made up identity is a joke. He's beyond crap as a musician. He had a 2 week top 10 hit in the 60s, and recordeded one song in the 70s with his brothers band that didn't even chart.
I admire his rat cunning, but he's a loser. He's been involved in WT boardroom politics for 20 years. The dude likes to live in his little made up rockstar cosplay like he was a legit star. That self delusion scares the sh1t out of me, because if he is happy to make the idiotic deciision to wear that Wig, he's just as happy to sack the best CEO in the business just as we're about to lock down some key players.
You know it is entirely possible to live in a world where we kept Tedesco and Moses, because this herpes riddled parrot and his cohort weren't leaking and sacking coaches every 18 months! It took him no time for the same behaviour to return once he became chair.
S/B joiningWhat?
"they have played a large roll"--that's different to your original claim where you just said HBG.
So, if your assertion is correct, it means HBG are not totally responsible.
Who were the other perpetrators?
Now, take a deep breath, relax and tell the truth.
Are you ok with that?
Thats good. Then the debenture holders shouldnt mind scrapping the system for members vote.I messaged pop who follows these matters and he was at the meeting and Denny definitely got voted for something, maybe Chair.
The debenture holders are generally wealthy people who are very popular with the members according to my grandfather, so would get elected often.
That's what was reportedDid that actually happen? PVL threatened to put them under administration?
Most reports are saying "hundreds" (SMH, Ch 9, Ch 7, News.com etc)Being reported as over 1000.
They don’t want to give WT’s independence. That’s the crux of the matter.It’s all of our shareholders and that includes a hopeless failure in Balmain. I think it’s important that is not forgotten in this. Obviously HBG are going to go on the defensive here.
My question is, what do they want in order to give Wests Tigers independence? Or do they just want it to die?
If it’s B, just come clean.
The rumor is infinitely better for HBG. It's one of two things. 1st isthe rumor is true and they did what they were told by the N.R.L through the threat of force. The 2nd is that they chose to just go back to the way things were. This scenario imo is infinitely worse for HBG. They got involved grenaded the club, then just decided 10 days later to go back to how it was. In either case it's incompetence and stupidity. At least if they went back because the N.R.L threatened them they can use that as their reason, the other way, what's the reason. They just decided to grenade the club and 10 days later put everything back the way it was because they were bored. Either way they're condemned by their own incompetence.I've heard that rumour.
Yeah and nobody supporting them seems to be answering my questions about what they would like to change on their side?They don’t want to give WT’s independence. That’s the crux of the matter.
Because they don’t even know lol it’s just blind loyalty & faith.Yeah and nobody supporting them seems to be answering my questions about what they would like to change on their side?
Any idea who paid to have those identical 100 signs printed ?Mate there must have been 100 signs today that said.
Wests Tigers
Not Balmain
Not Wests
Can't get any clearer than that. And we have people talking about Balmain paraphernalia, the sign states our position beautifully.
YukThere was a doggies one, too
Imo Wests Tigers as in the name is all we should have from the original 2 clubs. Up to me, I'd get the Balmain Tigers emblem and Magpie off the jerseys. Were one club now.Think you'll find this poster is referring to a suggestion the club be named "Tigers" not Wests Tigers.
Which would diminish the Magpies brand.
And it was suggested on here. You just overlooked it.