Hmmm, not sure looking at the balance sheet tells the whole story. Like I'd rather see 1 million spent under Richo than 5 million spent under Pascoe. Extra money with the wrong person in charge just gets invested into barber shops and too many Scott Fultons getting 250k and leaking about Aidan Sezer. Steve Noyce was better for us as CEO because he understood grassroots footy clubs, far better than super corporate Stephen Humphries who ruined our salary cap and couldn't lie straight in bed.
Same with amount of people at a club. Any more than 4 opinions in a meeting, they start to take longer and get less specific results. I've heard that Gallant is really good at what he does. Not saying that less is always better, but sometimes leaner operations can be more effective and agile than big lumbering giants, or comfy status quo setups. The club has fantastic facilities so I wouldn't say its completely under resourced.
Wests Tigers shouldn't need HBG in the same way that Souths no longer need Rusty as their sugar daddy. Souths are profitable in their own right. And I feel like the the NRL grant being what it is, that really changed the dynamic of HBG's influence is a really ironic way. HBG kind of get to stand on the shoulders of broadcast value, and the political weight they are throwing around is not proportionate to what they contribute, (or have historically contributed) in real terms.
Look back to how broke and under-resourced the club was in 2013 to see how Wests Ashfield turn up in a crisis.