Team After Bye

Bula, Api and Twal back in would give us a reasonable chance.

Ethan Roberts is a god send with so many players out. Gives us some unexpected strike power.

A lot of work needs to be done on our edge defence though.
 
A lot of work needs to be done on our edge defence though.

Not hard work, just clearer coaching.

We're depending on a tactical approach that our 2nd string players can't execute, so have so they need a simplified game plan. A few select senior players should be allowed to play eyes up footy and the reggies and younger lads should just be told to concentrate on executing the fundamentals of their game, while working their bloody arses off. That way everyone knows who's offloading and who's just going to graft.

Sione dropping the ball on the deck 5 times in 3 rounds in not a coincidence or bad luck. He's not concentrating. He's not experienced enough to carry a game, but he's thinking that he should be, so he's forgetting his technique. All these mistakes are cascading upon each other and our coaches haven't got an approach to deal with it.

The game came so naturally to Benji that I suspect, that like a lot of brilliant players who became coaches, that he struggles to understand what less brilliant players might need to find form. Some blokes need more (or perhaps less) than "express yourself'" -- If anything, that's harmful to certain players. Some blokes just need something simple to execute.

If your younger players have the jitters they're going to get bashed up and collapse. They're going to forget to be tough as well. If we're chasing a game by 18 points after 17 minutes against manly, off the back of missed tackles on their 40m line, our side isn't being prepared to compete properly. It's a mental not a tactical thing. Something is not going into the preparation that needs to be there.
 
Last edited:
1. Bula
2. Skelton/Laulili
3. T'oa
4. Makasini
5. Turuva
6. Latu
7. Madden
13. Twal
12. Pierce-Paul
11. Roberts
10. Pole
9. Koroisau
8. Terrell May

14. Luai
15. Sione Fainu
16. Hunt
17. Seyfarth
18. Hope
19. Laulili'i

The losing streak started when Luai came back.
No it didnt. We had an unreal performance against Canberra with Luai then lost Bula, Api, Doueihi, Fainu, Twal x 1 Terrel x 1 and now Taylan.
 
Can’t wait for API to get back but hope he’s had a good think about the impact his absence has on the team.
Been committing fouls all year( several fines then a suspension), come on Api we need you on the park.
I wonder if api has a a spell like this in the future , we simply run a Murray type to shore up the first 20 , then 60 of Heywood. Tristan seems like a great bloke , and awesome for team culture , but he needs to grab that KOE 9 jersey , and play out the year , maybe get himself a Leigh Leopards guernsey next year , or castleford.
It’s hard because I know Benji wants to reward guys who are going above and beyond day to day at concord .
But he’s just simply a step below . I think he’s done amazing to get himself this far , and be able to leverage his what 10-15 nrl games with unit a few years in England . I think that’s his future . I keep saying it , but we should go real hard for Damien cook for 18 months . Bench hooker when full strength so 19th man , come on for 15-20 mins most weeks , play out his career . Allow Heywood the 18 months to get his body right , then give him that role , transitioning into 50/50 with Ali by the end of 2028 . Obviously replacing API for 2029.
Madden I think needs to go back and do what he was recruited to do , control the KOE team. It’s hard with AD out , but when he comes back , I’d be going Latu , 3 middles , and edge and a back.
If we can recruit a 9 like cook , I’d be going Latu, cook , back and 2 middles , 1 hybrid( for me that would be Roberts when Samuela comes back ) .
I just want to also say I said Roberts was our best option at edge . And I was proven right . Sukkar to me ultimately looks like he will end up at lock or in the middle . So will Roberts , but Roberts clearly has ball skills , of which Sukkar doesn’t .
 
api back with twal and may both playing together should go along way to fixing up our putrid middle of the last few weeeks which should make our makeshift edges lives a little easier next week
Like the team performance description, it's sounds like an old broken-down car, not wrong the way they have been playing the last 3 weeks.
 
I wonder if api has a a spell like this in the future , we simply run a Murray type to shore up the first 20 , then 60 of Heywood. Tristan seems like a great bloke , and awesome for team culture , but he needs to grab that KOE 9 jersey , and play out the year , maybe get himself a Leigh Leopards guernsey next year , or castleford.
It’s hard because I know Benji wants to reward guys who are going above and beyond day to day at concord .
But he’s just simply a step below . I think he’s done amazing to get himself this far , and be able to leverage his what 10-15 nrl games with unit a few years in England . I think that’s his future . I keep saying it , but we should go real hard for Damien cook for 18 months . Bench hooker when full strength so 19th man , come on for 15-20 mins most weeks , play out his career . Allow Heywood the 18 months to get his body right , then give him that role , transitioning into 50/50 with Ali by the end of 2028 . Obviously replacing API for 2029.
Madden I think needs to go back and do what he was recruited to do , control the KOE team. It’s hard with AD out , but when he comes back , I’d be going Latu , 3 middles , and edge and a back.
If we can recruit a 9 like cook , I’d be going Latu, cook , back and 2 middles , 1 hybrid( for me that would be Roberts when Samuela comes back ) .
I just want to also say I said Roberts was our best option at edge . And I was proven right . Sukkar to me ultimately looks like he will end up at lock or in the middle . So will Roberts , but Roberts clearly has ball skills , of which Sukkar doesn’t .
Damien Cook signed with Castleford for next year.
 
His first season back, gets suspended for two weeks for Ill discipline when he knew how depleted the team is.

However how's the judiciary's form? Both Api & Herbert getting relatively long suspensions compared to players in other teams who have committed a similar or even worse offence. It seems as biased (though admittedly not as brutal) as the old Jim Coman's regime was against Western Suburbs back in the day.
But you've got to admit it, some of those animals deserved to be rubbed out.

Ah, the good old days. 🤣
 
I'm convinced most armchair coaches selecting their teams in here don't watch the kids. No way in any world is Attard ready for NRL. Luron Patea steamrolled him for a try on the weekend in reserve grade, and other mids have done the same in just about every other game he has played this season. NRL will eat him alive. As bad as some think Mason has been, the solution isn't someone else who isn't ready. The "he can't be worse" rationale is dumb. These boys need development, not a whipping in the top grade.
This is completely illogical - Mason can't tackle either.

Or pass.
Nor does he have any penetration.
He's not very good under the high ball, his positioning is poor (at best) and his hands have consistently let him down long term.

He hasn't even been playing fullback consistently at all.

Attard offers bucket loads more in attack and is comparable in D.

Play Sunia there in D and have Jack defend on the wing. It's been done successfully at several clubs before and is a not-uncommon way to bring a light player in for a game or two.

This trope about 'affecting development by bringing them in early' is hilarious. Every young player who is showing good signs in Cup will only benefit from short stints in NRL as needed and if required.

Otherwise, he could come in, get lapped in 1sts by 50 against the dogs, turn in an all-time shocker and it STILL will have 3/5ths of bugger-all impact on his long-term development.

Anyone seriously and genuinely concerned about how Masi or Tavana will develop long term after their howlers?

No. Exactly, it's irrelevant. It's experience.

He offers more than Mason in A and is equivalent in D.

Just like Masi, Tavana, Galvin, Luke, etc; all prospects tend to get a run or two early. That's the point. That's part of their development.

Sam Walker at Roosters. Kade Reed at Dragons. Walsh at Warriors. Brooks at Tigers (at 17), the list goes on and on and on.

No one is saying park him there for the rest of the year. But a game or two while we wait on Bula is a legitimate option.
Likewise, any mention of Haywood and NRL this season are hugely off the mark. Yes, he has better service and attacking potential than Hope, but like Attard he's still 19 and his body isn't up to handling 110kg specimens yet. 60 mins in NRL? The kid should be happy playing a 15-20 min stint in reserve grade giving Lanyon or Hodges are break, as both are currently Cup players in ability and physique. Flegg is his level right now.
Again, they're not 'hugely off the mark' ; this is hyperbole.

It is not out of the realms of possibility, at all, of having Haywood play small, bench minutes later in the year alongside Api.

Jared, who is 20 later this year, will have played the majority of the year in Cup by the time the last couple of months are upon us and 20/25 mins in grade may in fact be the perfect way to deputise him into 2027.

The other part of the discussion is the betterment of the team.

Like Mason, what is Hope bringing that Jared can't?

His service is slow and off the mark. He isn't a running or kicking threat. He's slow to the ruck. He's poor defending at marker or at A. He catches in defence and is yet to win a single tackle in grade. He tries and toils, but he's actively hurting our territory game. He's a deficit to us defensively, not just a liability, a deficit.

Andrews too. Has provided some good highlights with ball in hand so far, but fair to say he's is a bit of a turnstyle at the moment. Not NRL ready.

This is on the club. It hasn't had a genuine fringe NRL fullback back-up or hooker back-up for several seasons now, and it shows once Bula and Api are out. It has largely been kids and they get shown up greatly by NRL opposition.
Agree.

Though, to be fair, this is the very thing that is currently being built.

They needed to empty the squad, then get quality in/lock in long term, then develop depth/long term plan.

They've done the first two and, unfortunately and typically for us, we're still a year or so from having step 3 in place properly, so of course we get exposed. Here's just a couple of depth kids that are on the way, but not quite there...

fb - we have Attard and Brookes
hooker - we have Haywood/Hodges/Lanyon, etc
edge - Roberts, Godinet
prop - Taai, CTM, Aho, Duncombe, etc.
halves - Latu, Andrews

Most of what we're calling depth is too young and too exposed. We need (and have needed for forever) hardened, decent veterans that come in and fulfil a job. Bunty, Herbert, Geyer et al this year have missed the mark unfortunately.

And the way it has developed Latu Fainu is criminal. He should be in reserve grade every week working on his role as a halfback. All he's done in 3 seasons at Wests Tigers when fit is plug holes in the NRL 17-19. His career would've been better off staying at Manly. Maybe not as many first grade games to this point, but he would be a better half back in the long run.

Giving kids NRL debuts isn't a sign of development. It's a sign of desperation. Let the idiotic fans be desperate. The club should be better.
Again, I don't disagree with parts of what you're saying, but it's important to remember, that we don't all live in a developmental utopia where everything goes swimmingly.

Ideally, we'd have been flying, with depth and injury free for the last few years and Latu, injury free himself, may have had the chance to do so.

But that's not it. Firstly, he's been injured way too often for consistent dev. in any position.

Secondly, he's at a club that has spent years trying to finally get a stable, quality squad, with incumbents that he can learn off over time.

Who was he supposed to learn from the first couple of years? A busted Doueihi playing at centre or fb? Wakeham/Smith/Brooks?

It has just played out like that and it's unfortunate for his practice as a half.

That being said, he has gained a fair bit of NRL experience now at 20, which will only hold him in good stead. He's versatile by default, which has probably contributed to him playing quite a few positions to be fair, and this, too, whilst not improving his ability to play half, will help him overall as a footballer.

Injuries aside, Latu (who I've long thought is miles above the rest of the family- though Sammy has grown into my favourite), could still play in the league for 12+ years from here.
 
This is completely illogical - Mason can't tackle either.

Or pass.
Nor does he have any penetration.
He's not very good under the high ball, his positioning is poor (at best) and his hands have consistently let him down long term.

He hasn't even been playing fullback consistently at all.

Attard offers bucket loads more in attack and is comparable in D.

Play Sunia there in D and have Jack defend on the wing. It's been done successfully at several clubs before and is a not-uncommon way to bring a light player in for a game or two.

This trope about 'affecting development by bringing them in early' is hilarious. Every young player who is showing good signs in Cup will only benefit from short stints in NRL as needed and if required.

Otherwise, he could come in, get lapped in 1sts by 50 against the dogs, turn in an all-time shocker and it STILL will have 3/5ths of bugger-all impact on his long-term development.

Anyone seriously and genuinely concerned about how Masi or Tavana will develop long term after their howlers?

No. Exactly, it's irrelevant. It's experience.

He offers more than Mason in A and is equivalent in D.

Just like Masi, Tavana, Galvin, Luke, etc; all prospects tend to get a run or two early. That's the point. That's part of their development.

Sam Walker at Roosters. Kade Reed at Dragons. Walsh at Warriors. Brooks at Tigers (at 17), the list goes on and on and on.

No one is saying park him there for the rest of the year. But a game or two while we wait on Bula is a legitimate option.

Again, they're not 'hugely off the mark' ; this is hyperbole.

It is not out of the realms of possibility, at all, of having Haywood play small, bench minutes later in the year alongside Api.

Jared, who is 20 later this year, will have played the majority of the year in Cup by the time the last couple of months are upon us and 20/25 mins in grade may in fact be the perfect way to deputise him into 2027.

The other part of the discussion is the betterment of the team.

Like Mason, what is Hope bringing that Jared can't?

His service is slow and off the mark. He isn't a running or kicking threat. He's slow to the ruck. He's poor defending at marker or at A. He catches in defence and is yet to win a single tackle in grade. He tries and toils, but he's actively hurting our territory game. He's a deficit to us defensively, not just a liability, a deficit.


Agree.

Though, to be fair, this is the very thing that is currently being built.

They needed to empty the squad, then get quality in/lock in long term, then develop depth/long term plan.

They've done the first two and, unfortunately and typically for us, we're still a year or so from having step 3 in place properly, so of course we get exposed. Here's just a couple of depth kids that are on the way, but not quite there...

fb - we have Attard and Brookes
hooker - we have Haywood/Hodges/Lanyon, etc
edge - Roberts, Godinet
prop - Taai, CTM, Aho, Duncombe, etc.
halves - Latu, Andrews

Most of what we're calling depth is too young and too exposed. We need (and have needed for forever) hardened, decent veterans that come in and fulfil a job. Bunty, Herbert, Geyer et al this year have missed the mark unfortunately.


Again, I don't disagree with parts of what you're saying, but it's important to remember, that we don't all live in a developmental utopia where everything goes swimmingly.

Ideally, we'd have been flying, with depth and injury free for the last few years and Latu, injury free himself, may have had the chance to do so.

But that's not it. Firstly, he's been injured way too often for consistent dev. in any position.

Secondly, he's at a club that has spent years trying to finally get a stable, quality squad, with incumbents that he can learn off over time.

Who was he supposed to learn from the first couple of years? A busted Doueihi playing at centre or fb? Wakeham/Smith/Brooks?

It has just played out like that and it's unfortunate for his practice as a half.

That being said, he has gained a fair bit of NRL experience now at 20, which will only hold him in good stead. He's versatile by default, which has probably contributed to him playing quite a few positions to be fair, and this, too, whilst not improving his ability to play half, will help him overall as a footballer.

Injuries aside, Latu (who I've long thought is miles above the rest of the family- though Sammy has grown into my favourite), could still play in the league for 12+ years from here.
Think the Attard proposition is probably better now than it was 2 weeks ago. Putting him in the sides of the last 2-3 games as a fullback would absolutely be throwing him to the wolves. Whether that would have any impact on his development is a different debate I guess. Feel much better about throwing him next game with a few more big dogs back on the paddock.

Latu is still my boy, but Sam Fainu has exceeded expectations. Actually think we are missing him more than people realise. He was shaping as the real enforcer of that pack.
 
Back
Top