It's time to take the fight back to HBG

100% it does. I've experienced it first hand. You can guarantee the loud minority of fans that do not like Campbelltown are original Balmain fans.
But does HBG = Campbelltown? I don't think it does and so your assumption is mistaken. Don't blur the facts. HBG have presided over a shitshow for the longest time. This is not about a bird or a cat, it's about capable governance, accountability and integrity.
 
Someone can correct me if I'm wrong but debunture holders only get their debts paid if the company sells which would be FA.

Sounds like HBG doesn't have any shareholders which sounds quite weird to me, so even if HBG was to sell, I have no idea who keeps the money.

One thing that befuddles me is, who benefits from WT doing good? You follow the money and it literally sounds like no one is benefitting from WT. No one has any incentive to put more money into it.

Why would HBG sell WT or their own company if no one is benefitting from it?

It's like a piece of land that holds value, but you can't build on it, borrow off it, sell it or use it. You can just tell your friends you own it so that you look good..
More than likely and proceeds may go into some form of state govt trust. As a not for profit. Great question though id be very curious where the money would go. In saying that there is absolutly no incentive for HBG to care if we succeed apart from keeping the critisism of them at bay. We are just a toy to them they can use whenever it suits them.
 
But does HBG = Campbelltown? I don't think it does and so your assumption is mistaken. Don't blur the facts. HBG have presided over a shitshow for the longest time. This is not about a bird or a cat, it's about capable governance, accountability and integrity.
Im not talking about HBG. I was answering a question posed by another. Alot of hate about Cambo comes from Old balmain fans that cannot accept the Southwest is a part of the Wests Tigers. FACT
 
Someone can correct me if I'm wrong but debunture holders only get their debts paid if the company sells which would be FA.

Sounds like HBG doesn't have any shareholders which sounds quite weird to me, so even if HBG was to sell, I have no idea who keeps the money.

One thing that befuddles me is, who benefits from WT doing good? You follow the money and it literally sounds like no one is benefitting from WT. No one has any incentive to put more money into it.

Why would HBG sell WT or their own company if no one is benefitting from it?

It's like a piece of land that holds value, but you can't build on it, borrow off it, sell it or use it. You can just tell your friends you own it so that you look good..
A debenture of HBG is $100
 

The majority owners of the Wests Tigers, the Holman Barnes Group [HBG], recently took over the running of the Central Coast Mariners women’s football team. Asked about a potential Super League acquisition, HBG chief executive Daniel Paton said: “We’re very open to exploring opportunities that could strengthen the Wests Tigers and Holman Barnes Group, but naturally anything we considered would need to stack up strategically and commercially.”

😂😂😂🤦🏻‍
 

Underpinning the Roosters’ approach is an attention to detail aimed at forging a lasting association with the tri-colours. From dinners with the board in the academy units, to nutrition advice from champion fullback Anthony Minichiello and one-on-one video sessions with Friend and Aubusson, now the Roosters rugby league director, the first batch of academy alumni learned from the best.
 

Underpinning the Roosters’ approach is an attention to detail aimed at forging a lasting association with the tri-colours. From dinners with the board in the academy units, to nutrition advice from champion fullback Anthony Minichiello and one-on-one video sessions with Friend and Aubusson, now the Roosters rugby league director, the first batch of academy alumni learned from the best.
We do the same kind of stuff, right?
 
Why would we want the idiots who sent Balmain bankrupt in power again anyway?

We need to focus all our energy on getting HBG to do the right thing. Some debenture holders agree, and we almost had change if that coup hadn't happened. We need to get L&G and/or NRL to apply pressure - it's the only way forward
Its not that you would want the same people who ran Balmain into the ground back on board

Its just that the current ownership structure makes it difficult to create systemic change and without that a revolving door of players and coaches can't solve the underlying problems..

As you and I already know Holman Barnes group (owing to 90% ownership) have the power to blow up the Wests Tigers board at will if it suits their agenda which has already happened..

As an as much neutral non supporter I have put my thoughts forward in terms of; I dont think that pressure from the authorities (L&G or the NRL) is going to achieve the desired result. Both of these parties only have an impetus to intervene in limited circumstances. L&G work off compliance breaches and the NRL wont intervene unless the boardroom warring is damaging the NRL's brand

The pressure has to come from the fanbase onto the debenture holders. It would seem that not all of them are old dinosaurs. There are or were some potential reformists in there
 
Its not that you would want the same people who ran Balmain into the ground back on board

Its just that the current ownership structure makes it difficult to create systemic change and without that a revolving door of players and coaches can't solve the underlying problems..

As you and I already know Holman Barnes group (owing to 90% ownership) have the power to blow up the Wests Tigers board at will if it suits their agenda which has already happened..

As an as much neutral non supporter I have put my thoughts forward in terms of; I dont think that pressure from the authorities (L&G or the NRL) is going to achieve the desired result. Both of these parties only have an impetus to intervene in limited circumstances. L&G work off compliance breaches and the NRL wont intervene unless the boardroom warring is damaging the NRL's brand

The pressure has to come from the fanbase onto the debenture holders. It would seem that not all of them are old dinosaurs. There are or were some potential reformists in there
Hard to put pressure on them they are faceless and just keep scapegoating coaches, players & staff for their ineptitude
 
Back
Top