HBG, Independent Directors Sacked

weststigers said:
Why do you care who they supported pre-merger? They discuss a team that started in 1999 - Wests Tigers. They don't even mention Balmain or Wests. In fact, I think they're overly cautious about it, so as not to alienate people.

I know it hurts you that you lost your club, but living in the past with all that resentment and trying to bring down what others love won't make you happy.
Click to expand...
I couldn't care less, who’s on the podcasts,
I was simply responding to a claim made in an earlier post where a similar accusation was being made against @BZN

How am I trying to tear anything down ?
A bloke on a forum voicing an opinion, just like you and everyone else here 🤷‍♂️

#SticksAndStones
 
  • Love
Reactions: BZN
Bus 2 Terrigal said:
Hey two dozen, @BZN didn’t mention Balmain fans.

He spoke of peeps coming originally from the Balmain side of the equation - like every member of the Wests Tigers podcast, Wests Life podcast, Darcy Byrne etc etc..

There is a clear distinction between that and being a “Balmain fan”, or a Western Suburbs fan for that matter.
Click to expand...
Thanks for explaining that Terri gal. So “Balmain People” is distinct from “Balmain fans”
I suppose the Balmain people represent a much greater number than the Balmain fans. I suppose you and BNZ are more conscious of the greater number of Balmain people who are perhaps attracted by the Tiger and become WT fans?
Is it such a bad thing? What level of the split magpies/tigers fan base would you be happy with? For me personally I think any increase in the fan base is valued regardless of background, but would I feel the same way if I was a “Magpies person?” I don’t know?
 
twentyforty said:
Thanks for explaining that Terri gal. So “Balmain People” is distinct from “Balmain fans”
I suppose the Balmain people represent a much greater number than the Balmain fans. I suppose you and BNZ are more conscious of the greater number of Balmain people who are perhaps attracted by the Tiger and become WT fans?
Is it such a bad thing? What level of the split magpies/tigers fan base would you be happy with? For me personally I think any increase in the fan base is valued regardless of background, but would I feel the same way if I was a “Magpies person?” I don’t know?
Click to expand...
I wonder if we’re in a position to hand in our membership subscriptions and get a full refund.
That would be a powerful reminder that us members don’t stand for this (hit them how it hurts)could be a bigger protest than the proposed March.
Just wondering.??
 
Bus 2 Terrigal said:
Fair enough, I apologise.

You must concede however, that for the vast bulk of both podcasts existence - it’s true to say they’re really both created by, and have been very top heavy with former Balmain fans 🤷‍♂️
Click to expand...
Crazy how you said you don't care who they supported prior to the merger, yet proceed to make a point about who they supported prior to the merger. You've lost any semblance of credibility you might have had.
 
It's very easy to spot the Magpies fans who say they are all for WT and "Wests Tigers forever" but are obviously lying through their teeth.

If they are all for Wests Tigers, they would support the NSW Cup team being Wests Tigers as well then, like Jersey Flegg.

But ask them the above question and you will get your answer.
 
hybrid_tiger said:
It's very easy to spot the Magpies fans who say they are all for WT and "Wests Tigers forever" but are obviously lying through their teeth.

If they are all for Wests Tigers, they would support the NSW Cup team being Wests Tigers as well then, like Jersey Flegg.

But ask them the above question and you will get your answer.
Click to expand...

To them it’s more important who you supported 26 years ago ? WTF ? The priority should be winning games NOW!! What else really matters?
 
69tiger said:
I wonder if we’re in a position to hand in our membership subscriptions and get a full refund.
That would be a powerful reminder that us members don’t stand for this (hit them how it hurts)could be a bigger protest than the proposed March.
Just wondering.??
Click to expand...
I think I’ve heard of a few posters saying they tried and were denied the request but I think the protest is the start.

Boycott of games, memberships, merch and anything that contributes to HBG should be considered next. I think everyone organising this has a much better strategic mind then I do so I’m certain they’ve mapped out a response/pathway depending on how things play out.
 
69tiger said:
I wonder if we’re in a position to hand in our membership subscriptions and get a full refund.
That would be a powerful reminder that us members don’t stand for this (hit them how it hurts)could be a bigger protest than the proposed March.
Just wondering.??
Click to expand...
Somehow I don't think the poor membership staff will hit their KPI's this year
 
I hope we get an excellent result for WTs today, meaning Richo to remain as CEO and an administrator appointed to the club.

As for Wests Magpies in NSW Cup, I couldn't care less about what jumper the players wear. I mean no disrespect to the Wests Magpies, but NSW Cup for me is a transit lounge. If I watch a game, it will be to see a young Weststigers player who is obviously transiting to the NRL and is only there to get used to playing against more experienced players.
 
weststigers said:
Crazy how you said you don't care who they supported prior to the merger, yet proceed to make a point about who they supported prior to the merger. You've lost any semblance of credibility you might have had.
Click to expand...
As I said earlier - I was responding to a poster who did exactly the same thing to @BZN

Context, context, context, old boy 🤔
 
  • Love
Reactions: BZN
Big Red said:
Nothing stopping you and your mates from starting up a Wests Tigers podcast, might be time you had a crack instead of having a sook about being underrepresented. We’d all love to hear your views on Wests Tigers.
Click to expand...
Not sooking- simply used the podcasts as an example to answer a previous post.

I’ve no desire to start a podcast
 
  • Love
Reactions: BZN
weststigers said:
This all started because 4 independent directors got booted by HBG and now looks like Richo will move on too.

When someone said its not a Wests v Balmain thing you said "tell that to the media".

I'll pose the question again...what does any of this have to do with Balmain v Wests?
Click to expand...
What, so you’re trying to tell me the media doesn’t flame the Western Suburbs vs Balmain thing at every opportunity 🤔
 
  • Like
Reactions: BZN
liltiger said:
He's a very shrewd operator and if Pvl is as switched on as people say and Wayne Pearce really is his closest ally and confidant in the commission then I can't see how Pvl does anything other than what Richardson's asking for. Pvl would be aware of his track record. He would know Richardson knows his stuff, if he's saying we need away from HBG then iv no doubt Pvl is listening. Whether he has the stomach for a stoush with them iv no idea. Though HBG havnt really come across as the most competent group. I think if the articles right tomorrow Richardson is Ceo under an N.R.L admin, with all board members reinstated and the 2 HBG members replaced by N.R.L appointed board members until the Laundys consortium make the purchase and fully privatise the Wests Tigers.
Click to expand...
YES YES YES 🙏
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Members online

Total: 709 (members: 17, guests: 692)
Back
Top