HBG, Independent Directors Sacked

weststigers said:
I think the make-up is clear, however I would suggest the decision to return by BOF and co is to act as the eyes of the NRL at the club.

Make no mistake. BOF is a good operator and has friends in high places compared to the mugs that run our club, so my view is that this is an oversight position which is one step away from officially appointing an NRL administrator.

The NRL can't afford to have us embarrass ourselves every year or two. From their point of view, the 18M They give us each year is an investment to the area and rugby league. They're not going to allow that to be pissed up against the wall.
Click to expand...
Has it been confirmed that the independent that didn't want to come back is to be replaced by another HBG Einstein.
 
diedpretty said:
Maybe you can enlighten me on what my agenda is. All I want is Wests Tigers to become a consistently top 8 side. I don't give a shit about all the infighting but would definitely like to see the debenture rubbish gone and the full HBG board to be solely elected by members. I was happy that WT had finally become independent and pissed off like everyone else on here that hbg did what they did.
Click to expand...
I didnt say you had an agenda, I was just remarking about the comment you made of people "ramming their agendas down people's throats".
 
diedpretty said:
A lot of the magpies hatred towards Wests Tigers came from what Sheens did - stacked Balmain with NRL players and let Wests run with park footballers. Some of the scores against them were atrocious. Balmain put 88 and 76 on them. They had 50+ put on them 18 times and had a differential of minus 1100. And then you wonder why Wests see themselves as disrespected in the JV
Click to expand...
He did it because he wanted a single reserve grade side and they refused, so he stacked one of the sides. The "other side" would always have been justified to complain.

But Sheens was vindicated, we won the comp.
 
TIGERS said:
Mate the dude is a fake. He has a fake and made up identity. And even that fake and made up identity is a joke. He's beyond crap as a musician. He had a 2 week top 10 hit in the 60s, and recordeded one song in the 70s with his brothers band that didn't even chart.

I admire his rat cunning, but he's a loser. He's been involved in WT boardroom politics for 20 years. The dude likes to live in his little made up rockstar cosplay like he was a legit star. That self delusion scares the sh1t out of me, because if he is happy to make the idiotic deciision to wear that Wig, he's just as happy to sack the best CEO in the business just as we're about to lock down some key players.

You know it is entirely possible to live in a world where we kept Tedesco and Moses, because this herpes riddled parrot and his cohort weren't leaking and sacking coaches every 18 months! It took him no time for the same behaviour to return once he became chair.
Click to expand...
Allegedly
 
Rally was great! Love the idea of a “ tigers unite” fan association.
If we get 20,000 fans registered under a organised fans association, it will truly amazing the influence we will have over any one individual or organised group that is trying to sabotage our club for their own agendas.
 
Savvy said:
Rally was great! Love the idea of a “ tigers unite” fan association.
If we get 20,000 fans registered under a organised fans association, it will truly amazing the influence we will have over any one individual or organised group that is trying to sabotage our club for their own agendas.
Click to expand...
😱 It's way past time for you to start thinking logically dude.
WTs is not your club.
You are only a bit player in the game.
Wests Magpies have a huge % of controlling interest in WTs.
All you're doing now is to continue to unsettle the club.

The way our club is now, gives Us the best ever opportunity to settle down and be the club everyone wants Us to be, if we all have the same goal.
The only people that are likely to SABOTAGE WTs directly, are the ones that atpit obviously hate the Magpies and won't accept reality.
 
BZN said:
😱 It's way past time for you to start thinking logically dude.
WTs is not your club.
You are only a bit player in the game.
Wests Magpies have a huge % of controlling interest in WTs.
All you're doing now is to continue to unsettle the club.

The way our club is now, gives Us the best ever opportunity to settle down and be the club everyone wants Us to be, if we all have the same goal.
The only people that are likely to SABOTAGE WTs directly, are the ones that atpit obviously hate the Magpies and won't accept reality.
Click to expand...
Gee, that's way too strong but sadly I do notice an attempt by many on this forum to diminish the Wests brand within the Wests Tigers which is sad.

Seems to be encouraged really.
 
BZN said:
😱 It's way past time for you to start thinking logically dude.
WTs is not your club.
You are only a bit player in the game.
Wests Magpies have a huge % of controlling interest in WTs.
All you're doing now is to continue to unsettle the club.

The way our club is now, gives Us the best ever opportunity to settle down and be the club everyone wants Us to be, if we all have the same goal.
The only people that are likely to SABOTAGE WTs directly, are the ones that atpit obviously hate the Magpies and won't accept reality.
Click to expand...
History tells me while the HBG have the numbers on the board and the debenture system in place our club is still going to struggle and another revolt is always on the cards
 
BZN said:
😱 It's way past time for you to start thinking logically dude.
WTs is not your club.
You are only a bit player in the game.
Wests Magpies have a huge % of controlling interest in WTs.
All you're doing now is to continue to unsettle the club.

The way our club is now, gives Us the best ever opportunity to settle down and be the club everyone wants Us to be, if we all have the same goal.
The only people that are likely to SABOTAGE WTs directly, are the ones that atpit obviously hate the Magpies and won't accept reality.
Click to expand...
The club is good. The ownership structure is anything but. No one who is serious about supporting the Wests Tigers is talking balmain or magpies. They're gone the way of the pterodactyl.
 
BZN said:
😱 It's way past time for you to start thinking logically dude.
WTs is not your club.
You are only a bit player in the game.
Wests Magpies have a huge % of controlling interest in WTs.
All you're doing now is to continue to unsettle the club.

The way our club is now, gives Us the best ever opportunity to settle down and be the club everyone wants Us to be, if we all have the same goal.
The only people that are likely to SABOTAGE WTs directly, are the ones that atpit obviously hate the Magpies and won't accept reality.
Click to expand...
Just wondering. Were you happy 3 weeks ago with the way the club was run? I was...I'd even go as far as to say HBG were doing a great job.
 
BZN said:
😱 It's way past time for you to start thinking logically dude.
WTs is not your club.
You are only a bit player in the game.
Wests Magpies have a huge % of controlling interest in WTs.
All you're doing now is to continue to unsettle the club.

The way our club is now, gives Us the best ever opportunity to settle down and be the club everyone wants Us to be, if we all have the same goal.
The only people that are likely to SABOTAGE WTs directly, are the ones that atpit obviously hate the Magpies and won't accept reality.
Click to expand...
"If we all have the same goal"

I'm curious what that goal is for you?
 
weststigers said:
Gee, sadly I notice an attempt by many on the forum to diminish the Balmain brand within the Wests Tigers which is sad.

Seems to be encouraged really.
Click to expand...

You seem very active on these topics I noticed lol, probably 100s of posts on the topic.

Anyway, I haven't noticed anyone diminishing Balmain's brand through the tigers or their history on here really, which is the way it should be.

But I have noticed Wests Magpies history denigrated and as I have mentioned previously many pushing for just a Tigers brand or a disconnect of the Wests brand from its traditional history, so I don't know what you referring to there..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Members online

Total: 704 (members: 17, guests: 687)
Back
Top