HBG, Independent Directors Sacked

Perhaps for some clarity, someone can list here the Team of 7, who they are, there background and WHY they are considered suitable for election to a board of directors.

At least one of them has a disgraced background
 
cdinoz007 said:
Write to the L&G and ask for a copy of the investigation.

They will happily share with you their report.

But the fact that nothing is in the news, the club HASNT changed the Constitution is really the evidence you need.
Click to expand...
You seem to know nothing happened or was recommended to be done but have zero facts , do you have a copy if so put it up , just cause it’s not in the news or public info doesn’t mean zero happened or was dreamed wrong , I did 6 years as a director of a sports club , 2 years as treasure and a lot said on hear is right and a lot is wrong , facts are the only way to work out how or what needs to be done , the current group elected are protected species , I doubt they would be elected under a std voting system , the debenture protects them , and I do agree other clubs with other set ups have crap boards , infighting etc , it’s just people usually trying to work from a std director to a spot higher up - president , senior vice president, treasurer , etc , the old I’m the boss , it happens and did on our board , vice president V President , secret meetings outside at a cafe , jostling for support , can be very messy, just on the treasure position , we all had to do a term of 2 years as this position did have more involved as the monthly report you did had a fair bit in it with comparisons from month to month and year to days V same period previous year , it wasn’t a spot you needed to challenge for , we all did it if you did a couple of terms ( 2 year terms )
 
Last edited:
cdinoz007 said:
I do from time to time. I along with anyone else admitting to also being a Magpies member were blocked from Kelly Hollis group.

She likes her views to be fully supported. When you don't agree with her, she removes you.

Rather like this childish petition to the board, that's a stench of dictatorship
Click to expand...
Magpies groups do the same mate, in fact you hide in there and bag people, so I don't think you can be critical.
 
cdinoz007 said:
Why does it need to be run "like other clubs"??

Balmain Leagues Club had the same setup as "other clubs". We know what happened there.

Parramatta has that same setup. We know the history of board infighting there.

Look at the Bulldogs and their recent boardroom fighting.

This ain't no vision of Paradise
Click to expand...
That's why i support a professional recruitment process for the appointment of the Wests Tigers board members.

You know like we had for the directors HBG canned.
 
426Tlgerland said:
You seem to know nothing happened or was recommended to be done but have zero facts , do you have a copy if so put it up , just cause it’s not in the news or public info doesn’t mean zero happened or was dreamed wrong , I did 6 years as a director of a sports club , 2 years as treasure and a lot said on hear is right and a lot is wrong , facts are the only way to work out how or what needs to be done , the current group elected are protected species , I doubt they would be elected under a std voting system , the debenture protects them , and I do agree other clubs with other set ups have crap boards , infighting etc , it’s just people usually trying to work from a std director to a spot higher up - president , senior vice president, treasurer , etc , the old I’m the boss , it happens and did on our board , vice president V President , secret meetings outside at a cafe , jostling for support , can be very messy, just on the treasure position , we all had to do a term of 2 years as this position did have more involved as the monthly report you did had a fair bit in it with comparisons from month to month and year to days V same period previous year , it wasn’t a spot you needed to challenge for , we all did it if you did a couple of terms ( 2 year terms )
Click to expand...
So as an ex director, you should know how easy it is to gain a copy of that report from the L&G.

Sending them the request will take you 2 minutes at best

They usually respond quickly
 
innsaneink said:
Maybe we need to start looking at three years time...voting priviliges from then, and a year out from when the heritage deed is up

It costs bugga all

$3 – 1 Year
$13 – 5 Years Includes Bonus $10 in Dining Points
Click to expand...
Do I recall correctly that when the petition first came out, a couple of years ago, that new memberships were blocked at WA?
 
Last edited:
cdinoz007 said:
So as an ex director, you should know how easy it is to gain a copy of that report from the L&G.

Sending them the request will take you 2 minutes at best

They usually respond quickly
Click to expand...
So you have a copy going of the info given but choose not to share it with all of us , just curious, have you or are you a current director of a sporting club or any club , as for the report I’m not to fussed as at present the current board and it’s set up again is protected , not a lot you can do unless you do what the group we speak about is starting to do now , break the old system and get a new one in place , remember even if it goes ahead , the debenture scrapped , the ones on the board now can run again just with no protection
 
cdinoz007 said:
I do from time to time. I along with anyone else admitting to also being a Magpies member were blocked from Kelly Hollis group.

She likes her views to be fully supported. When you don't agree with her, she removes you.

Rather like this childish petition to the board, that's a stench of dictatorship
Click to expand...
lol define 'fully supported' - you won't be able to because it is a completely subjective idea.

Childish is your frequent use of extreme language to describe opinions you disagree with - references to North Korea, 'stench', 'dictatorship', 'blocked'.
 
cdinoz007 said:
Perhaps for some clarity, someone can list here the Team of 7, who they are, there background and WHY they are considered suitable for election to a board of directors.

At least one of them has a disgraced background
Click to expand...
That no doubt will be provided in time.

These 7 would be voted in by members. Major improvement on the debenture holders that arent voted in by general members and remove those on the board that are.

Maybe the debenture holders should come out of the shadows and start showing their credentials or at least talk in a public forum! Stack themselves up against these guys.
 
This will be in the media by he end of the day I think , PVL will either be smiling his plan is taking shape or he will be blowing a fuse , But the ones who will be doing all the hiding will be the current board , duck for cover Dennis and co .
 
rihannafan1 said:
lol define 'fully supported' - you won't be able to because it is a completely subjective idea.

Childish is your frequent use of extreme language to describe opinions you disagree with - references to North Korea, 'stench', 'dictatorship', 'blocked'.
Click to expand...
And yet I was blocked, and for having what, a difference of opinion? What else do you call that? I'm all ears
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Members online

Total: 598 (members: 1, guests: 597)
Back
Top