HBG, Independent Directors Sacked

Jolls said:
I have drawn my line in the sand and will push for unity with whoever I can. If there is enough pushing the same barrow and potentially if someone like @TheEnz can get himself elected onto the board then we have a voice inside the tent.

So much easier to get the joint aligned if your inside the tent mixing with the right crowd and sewing the seeds of change.
Click to expand...
The interesting thing about all of this is that I was interviewed for a board role on the Independent Wests Tigers board over 18 months ago. It was done by the external recruitment group Elevate Talent. It was a very professional process and we went into a fairly deep dive of my background and experience and how it aligns with the skills matrix that they are looking to fill. Unfortunately (or perhaps fortunately in hindsight) we both concluded that my areas of expertise (predominately in Technology leadership at an APAC/global level for multinational companies) do not really align with the skills matrix they were looking to fill. Whilst I had experience on the administrative/management side, they were looking for people that also had strong local contacts in Govt and business to help with sponsorship, community engagement and lifting the profile of the team and players. Having been in a regional/global role most of my contacts are based in the US or the UK and include Microsoft, Dell, AT&T etc.... none that would be too interested in sponsoring or supporting an NRL team.
I left the interview feeling very confident that they would select the right people and they were going about it in a very professional and open manner. Once they announced the independent directors the individuals did align really well with the matrix and the local contacts/influence. So i felt like we were heading in the right direction.

Now compare that to having to fill that skills matrix from a pool of 20 debenture holders and you begin to see where the fundamental issue lies.

I'm happy to support change and lend my voice and experience to it, whilst I'm not afraid to say that I started off life as a Dragons supporter (dads team) I shifted to the Tigers as a teenager in the 80's. Never had any affiliation or interest in Balmain, I grew up and played most of my footy in the shire and only ever visited the inner west to go to games at Leichhardt oval. So for me the team has always been the Tigers and now the Wests Tigers. I now live in the inner west, not far from Wests Ashfield and do visit the club on the odd occasion for a drink and a feed or to watch a Wests Tigers game. I am 100% all in on the Wests Tigers and proudly so.
 
cochise said:
A coach that has no desire to coach elsewhere and was widely regarded as a poor coach. There was no reason to extend Benji at that time. I am a huge Benji fan and believe he will be a great coach.

The extension was to calm player unrest over the board room dramas. Same reason the clauses are still in Luai's contract despite being heavily rumoured before the drama.
Click to expand...
So right, it was a deliberate move to try and repair the unbelievable damage they had caused with not only the majority of the fan base but also the players , coaches and the rest of the football department. Calling it a possible master stroke by the board is delusional
 
TheEnz said:
The interesting thing about all of this is that I was interviewed for a board role on the Independent Wests Tigers board over 18 months ago. It was done by the external recruitment group Elevate Talent. It was a very professional process and we went into a fairly deep dive of my background and experience and how it aligns with the skills matrix that they are looking to fill. Unfortunately (or perhaps fortunately in hindsight) we both concluded that my areas of expertise (predominately in Technology leadership at an APAC/global level for multinational companies) do not really align with the skills matrix they were looking to fill. Whilst I had experience on the administrative/management side, they were looking for people that also had strong local contacts in Govt and business to help with sponsorship, community engagement and lifting the profile of the team and players. Having been in a regional/global role most of my contacts are based in the US or the UK and include Microsoft, Dell, AT&T etc.... none that would be too interested in sponsoring or supporting an NRL team.
I left the interview feeling very confident that they would select the right people and they were going about it in a very professional and open manner. Once they announced the independent directors the individuals did align really well with the matrix and the local contacts/influence. So i felt like we were heading in the right direction.

Now compare that to having to fill that skills matrix from a pool of 20 debenture holders and you begin to see where the fundamental issue lies.

I'm happy to support change and lend my voice and experience to it, whilst I'm not afraid to say that I started off life as a Dragons supporter (dads team) I shifted to the Tigers as a teenager in the 80's. Never had any affiliation or interest in Balmain, I grew up and played most of my footy in the shire and only ever visited the inner west to go to games at Leichhardt oval. So for me the team has always been the Tigers and now the Wests Tigers. I now live in the inner west, not far from Wests Ashfield and do visit the club on the odd occasion for a drink and a feed or to watch a Wests Tigers game. I am 100% all in on the Wests Tigers and proudly so.
Click to expand...
Similar experience with the board interview - global contacts in Defence Industry and rural consrtuction contacts that would not be interested in sponsoring Wests Tigers. On top of that I am not based in the area. I also thought when the board was announced that the selections were definitely a better match than what I had to offer.
 
Last edited:
weststigers said:
Where HBG were the majority on the WT board in the past...

Could someone list their past achievements? Just to be fair and objective to HBG leadership and stewardship.

We seem to be focusing on one decision they made which has yet to play out in its entirety. Even Don Bradman got the occasional duck, so let's look at the whole picture.

Happy to hear from @Bus 2 Terrigal Lagoon @The Chad and any other supporters and defenders of this most recent change.
Click to expand...
Thats a fair approach, I look forward to the responses.
 
weststigers said:
Where HBG were the majority on the WT board in the past...

Could someone list their past achievements? Just to be fair and objective to HBG leadership and stewardship.

We seem to be focusing on one decision they made which has yet to play out in its entirety. Even Don Bradman got the occasional duck, so let's look at the whole picture.

Happy to hear from @Bus 2 Terrigal Lagoon @The Chad and any other supporters and defenders of this most recent change.
Click to expand...
Thanks for the opportunity Fridgey.
Its a great question you've posed and I'm sure everyone will have different highlights to share.

My top five would have to be - Brooksy's BBQ (magnificent tribute), the Zurich Centre of Excellence, the addition of Matt Groat to the Wests Ashfield gym staff, Wests Ts managing to sign half of the champion Penrith team, and of course there's free Mahjong at the club on Thursday nights 🙂
 
Bus 2 Terrigal Lagoon said:
Thanks for the opportunity Fridgey.
Its a great question you've posed and I'm sure everyone will have different highlights to share.

My top five would have to - Brooksy's BBQ (magnificent tribute), the Zurich Centre of Excellence, the addition of Matt Groat to the Wests Ashfield gym staff, Wests Ts managing to sign half of the champion Penrith team, and of course there's free Mahjong at the club on Thursday nights 🙂
Click to expand...
This is what I’m talking about … you’re literally mocking him for asking you a genuine question . Yet you play the victim that you’re not stirring shit , and are a bad faith actor , when you replied to my post .
Like I said it’s just bad faith acting / debating. And honestly just makes you look like a fool, and you’re evading the question .
 
Lestronge said:
This is what I’m talking about … you’re literally mocking him for asking you a genuine question . Yet you play the victim that you’re not stirring shit , and are a bad faith actor , when you replied to my post .
Like I said it’s just bad faith acting / debating. And honestly just makes you look like a fool, and you’re evading the question .
Click to expand...
Appreciate it mate, but are you really surprised? In his attempt to be clever and make a joke about it, he is also admitting there is nothing he can point to in terms of achievement.

It's rather amusing watching a really cocky, yet low IQ individual thinking he's got the crowd won. Let him go...it's obviously a really big moment for him.

For them, HBG = Wests and they will blindly support that. For me, it's about quality management and a commitment to progressing the Wests Tigers brand (Not Wests and Not Balmain).
 
weststigers said:
Appreciate it mate, but are you really surprised? In his attempt to be clever and make a joke about it, he is also admitting there is nothing he can point to in terms of achievement.

It's rather amusing watching a really cocky, yet low IQ individual thinking he's got the crowd won. Let him go...it's obviously a really big moment for him.

For them, HBG = Wests and they will blindly support that. For me, it's about quality management and a commitment to progressing the Wests Tigers brand (Not Wests and Not Balmain).
Click to expand...

Oh the irony of your first paragraph 😂😂😂😂
 
TheEnz said:
The interesting thing about all of this is that I was interviewed for a board role on the Independent Wests Tigers board over 18 months ago. It was done by the external recruitment group Elevate Talent. It was a very professional process and we went into a fairly deep dive of my background and experience and how it aligns with the skills matrix that they are looking to fill. Unfortunately (or perhaps fortunately in hindsight) we both concluded that my areas of expertise (predominately in Technology leadership at an APAC/global level for multinational companies) do not really align with the skills matrix they were looking to fill. Whilst I had experience on the administrative/management side, they were looking for people that also had strong local contacts in Govt and business to help with sponsorship, community engagement and lifting the profile of the team and players. Having been in a regional/global role most of my contacts are based in the US or the UK and include Microsoft, Dell, AT&T etc.... none that would be too interested in sponsoring or supporting an NRL team.
I left the interview feeling very confident that they would select the right people and they were going about it in a very professional and open manner. Once they announced the independent directors the individuals did align really well with the matrix and the local contacts/influence. So i felt like we were heading in the right direction.

Now compare that to having to fill that skills matrix from a pool of 20 debenture holders and you begin to see where the fundamental issue lies.

I'm happy to support change and lend my voice and experience to it, whilst I'm not afraid to say that I started off life as a Dragons supporter (dads team) I shifted to the Tigers as a teenager in the 80's. Never had any affiliation or interest in Balmain, I grew up and played most of my footy in the shire and only ever visited the inner west to go to games at Leichhardt oval. So for me the team has always been the Tigers and now the Wests Tigers. I now live in the inner west, not far from Wests Ashfield and do visit the club on the odd occasion for a drink and a feed or to watch a Wests Tigers game. I am 100% all in on the Wests Tigers and proudly so.
Click to expand...
Really interesting mate. Seems like we're very much in the same field, and I agree that our experiences aren't a good fit for a club board. Unless you're consulting or in IT leadership for a certain client group that fits with the sponsorship model.

Given your ability to self-assess the fit of your own capabilities and the quality in which you communicate, I still think you'd be a much better option than a large chunk of what they have there now.
 
hammertime said:
Really interesting mate. Seems like we're very much in the same field, and I agree that our experiences aren't a good fit for a club board. Unless you're consulting or in IT leadership for a certain client group that fits with the sponsorship model.

Given your ability to self-assess the fit of your own capabilities and the quality in which you communicate, I still think you'd be a much better option than a large chunk of what they have there now.
Click to expand...
Thanks HT, by the way the interviewers did say that if we were looking for IT leadership skills I would have been progressed, so all is not lost for us IT guys ;-) I did get on my soapbox with them though as I believe every board needs to have technology as a component of the skills matrix. Teams are relying on it quite heavily, and they should have someone at a board level that can help navigate what can be a very murky and crowded area.
 
hammertime said:
Really interesting mate. Seems like we're very much in the same field, and I agree that our experiences aren't a good fit for a club board. Unless you're consulting or in IT leadership for a certain client group that fits with the sponsorship model.

Given your ability to self-assess the fit of your own capabilities and the quality in which you communicate, I still think you'd be a much better option than what they have there now.
Click to expand...
Interesting to see there are a few of us here working in tech. Its probably why we have high expextations/standards, because we are working in an industry that is ever evolving. If you don't evolve in our industry you get left behind.

What do you guys think of what's happening with claude ai? It definitely shook up the market.
 
TheEnz said:
Thanks HT, by the way the interviewers did say that if we were looking for IT leadership skills I would have been progressed, so all is not lost for us IT guys ;-) I did get on my soapbox with them though as I believe every board needs to have technology as a component of the skills matrix. Teams are relying on it quite heavily, and they should have someone at a board level that can help navigate what can be a very murky and crowded area.
Click to expand...
haha. Great stuff and agree. That is true if the board is big enough. I think with 3 seats to fill, it's really more of a deprioritization given how much we needed to boost revenue. Also, most of the IT I see coming out seems to be coordinated at the NRL level - maybe it's quite different behind the scenes with the OT. Especially the sports science tech.

Now, if we could just open up those Balmain and HBG club seats........
 
mtd#2 said:
Interesting to see there are a few of us here working in tech. Its probably why we have high expextations/standards, because we are working in an industry that is ever evolving. If you don't evolve in our industry you get left behind.

What do you guys think of what's happening with claude ai? It definitely shook up the market.
Click to expand...
I'm on the Google horse, so Claude sucks. 🙂
 
mtd#2 said:
Interesting to see there are a few of us here working in tech. Its probably why we have high expextations/standards, because we are working in an industry that is ever evolving. If you don't evolve in our industry you get left behind.

What do you guys think of what's happening with claude ai? It definitely shook up the market.
Click to expand...
lol, maybe we should start a WT digital thread. I'm sure a fair percentage of people on this forum are not too interested in hearing about Claude, Gemini, Anthropic, CoPilot etc..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Staff online

Members online

Total: 772 (members: 8, guests: 764)
Back
Top