@formerguest said in [Adam Doueihi](/post/1107007) said:@Anon-lurker said in [Adam Doueihi](/post/1106959) said:@happy_tiger said in [Adam Doueihi](/post/1105996) said:@Tiger5150 said in [Adam Doueihi](/post/1105994) said:@Nelson said in [Adam Doueihi](/post/1105990) said:The Doueihi deal is skewed by the ridiculous contract that Souths gave him. If he weren't already getting $600K for 2021 under that deal I don't imagine many would be saying that we should be paying $600K for him for 2021, or that he would have any right to demand that sort of salary. Those being critical of the club not just leaping in and taking on that salary should consider what kind of salary they thought he was on or would have justified before that $600K figure came out. I seriously doubt anyone would have thought he was contracted for anything more than $400K at the absolute most.
Agree 100% but the flip side is that if it wasnt for that ridiculous contract, h wouldnt be potentially available now.
There has to be a reason he is on such a ridiculous contract, they must have been biddig against someone. Roosters I wonder?
Depends on the timing of the deal ...if it was just post GI's retirement and not having a viable option for the future it could make sense
They have LM now .....paying 600 k for a now benchie is ridiculous
Same as Paperhuyzen ....we never would have let him go if we knew Tedesco was going
Timing timing timing folks
Then why wasn’t paps picked up start of 2019 when storm were offering him to everyone , can’t keep using that Tedesco excuse
Lack of cap space most likely governing any potential play for him at that point, if the coach was interested at all.
Doubt he would have been on much more than min wage at time, but the Farah situation may have meant no signings if squad wasn’t full