Alex Seyfarth #232

Yet his discipline lost us the game in the end. It was a high tackle, he needed to get lower.
4 Penalties in 4 games plus the set restarts to start the season does not paint a picture of improvement in discipline. I know that some of us are desperate for him to improve and will convince ourselfs of anything if we try hard enough but calling the guy who cost us the game the best player on the field is a comical.Especially when guys like May are playing 80mins in the middle.

He played hard and gave it his best, but his biggest weakness is biting us in the backside once again.
 
Yeah, he busted his arse for the full 80. Calling him lazy is lazy in itself.
Also, I didn't say he was lazy I said the effort was lazy as he stayed up right and didn't make an effort to get low. Bending his knees and lowering his target area would have taken away the possibility of making contract with the head. Players are aware of this are actively coached to lower their target area. It was just a poor decision by him to stay upright in that tackle particularly given the context of the game (scoreboard, tackle count and position on the field) and unfortunately what could wrong, did go wrong.
 
Still cant believe that penalty.He ducked and head butted Sefarths shoulder,then went down holding his head
Weak gutted dog,as Ricky wld say!
Honestly, you can't blame CNK, Turuva did the same. If it was one of our players 40m out at 24-24 i would want them to stay down to get the penalty. Players just need to be super careful when making tackles and aim lower on the ball carrier.
 
Honestly, you can't blame CNK, Turuva did the same. If it was one of our players 40m out at 24-24 i would want them to stay down to get the penalty. Players just need to be super careful when making tackles and aim lower on the ball carrier.
The current interpretation is a complete over reaction to what is a very real issue thats creating an over reaction
You cant just duck down into a tackle in the last second and automatically receive a penalty,and thats exactly what happened.Twice
Theres zero intent...no negligence...and absolutely no way of any tackler escaping this
A passing fad that teams like Warriors are exploiting ,and VLandys needs to address
Its total BS
 
The current interpretation is a complete over reaction to what is a very real issue thats creating an over reaction
You cant just duck down into a tackle in the last second and automatically receive a penalty,and thats exactly what happened.Twice
Theres zero intent...no negligence...and absolutely no way of any tackler escaping this
A passing fad that teams like Warriors are exploiting ,and VLandys needs to address
Its total BS
Agree with you on this, but unfortunately that is the rule and the coaches and players are aware of it. You can argue there are just as many concussions from tackling low and catching a stray hip.

Its a shit rule but players need to be mindful and do their best to make sure they're not put in a compromising position. If you stand completely upright going into a tackle or even bracing for impact in a completely upright position you know as a player you're likely to make some sort of contact with the head in some capacity, particularly on a shorter/smaller player who is looking for it.
 
I said at the start of the season that if Seyfarth didn't fix his discipline issues he was going to cost us games. It's been 4 games and he's already cost us one...

Sure, CNK milked it but at the end of the day Seyfarth made contact with his head and it was a penalty. He needs to aim lower, he was standing up right and needed to get down. Lazy and ill disciplined with the game on the line. You can cop that early in the game but not at 24-24, in our own half with less than 10 to go. He's not a rookie, he should know better. We need to stop making excuses for him.

Sione Fainu was also in the tackle and he got down low enough to ensure he wasn't anywhere near CNK head. I just hope de doesn't cost us more games. Unfortunately we're at the point where he doesn't seem to be learning from his mistakes.
We certainly have quite a "tall" forward pack in Fainu, Seyfarth, May and Twal.
 
It is a Tackling technique should have been worked on players in the off season. No real big issue it was milked and we suffered for it.
I would usually agree if it wasn't a repeat offender. From what i've seen so far this season our players are generally better at not being pinned for high tackles so it seems that they have worked on their technique in the offseason.

The issue is probably more to do with fatigue and some players reverting back to bad habits (not bending their back and lowering target area) when under fatigue. Similar with ruck infringements and not getting off the players quick enough.
 
CC it is a technique lazy players use. Look at Ray Stone at the Dolphins always hits in the chest/Tigh areas, Lok at the nutter from the Roosters Radley same area. Jake t from Manly same area.
 
CC it is a technique lazy players use. Look at Ray Stone at the Dolphins always hits in the chest/Tigh areas, Lok at the nutter from the Roosters Radley same area. Jake t from Manly same area.
Agreed, which is why I was critical of Seyfarth in this instance. Again, it generally happens under fatigue but he needs to get that out of his game and lower his target area. Can't afford to be making those efforts with the game on line as the consequences are much greater.
 
You can't take one thing from Seyfarth's game and ignore all that he contributed, while also discounting the costly errors made from other players that allowed the Warriors to get back into the game. Should never have been 24 all when it happened.
That's fair, but as someone who is an experienced player who has had issues with discipline his whole career he should know better, particularly at that point in the game. If our team is to improve, we need our players to improve too.
 
This talk on Seyfarth costing us the game is stupid. We lost because the Warriors were better than us for most of the game and we panicked in those last 5 minutes. It is not the sole responsibility of one specific player.

But anyway since we are going down this route. Seyfarth's tackle, despite what most people are saying, is most definitely a penalty if the refs are being consistent with previous calls (link). Personally, I don't think penalties where a player falls into a high tackle should be given unless excessive force is displayed (Sua'ali'i on Walsh), as it's entirely accidental and unintentional, but that's my opinion and not the direction been given to the officials. However, I don't understand how Turuva did not get a penalty given he definitely got hit high and had to get HIA'd.
1743408043969.png

Anyway, I digress. Leading up to Seyfarth's penalty. He makes the 1st and 4th tackle in similar fashion and is involved in the 2nd. On the 5th tackle he's tracking back from marker, Egan gets close he pushes him away lightly then moves in to make the tackle. CNK is only 9cm shorter than Seyfarth but CNK is looking for a way through the line so running a bit lower because turning and whatever. Seyfarth obviously doesn't correct enough (he does a little and torso is bent 35 degrees from vertical (measured)) and hits him high. This is a penalty and sure Seyfarth should have aimed lower, but if he aims too low he is below the ball carrying arm and at risk of an ineffective tackle (where an offload is made) unless Latu gets there. I know it's easy to say "go low" but he's also got to wrap the ball up as well so it's a fine balance he has to achieve and this time he misses too high and it's a penalty.
P.S Just to make it clear, I'm not trying to justify the penalty, it's a penalty and he needed to correct a bit more. I'm just trying to provide context to the situation like I would do for Faataape (as an example, 15 game player under pressure to come up with game-winning play does something stupid).

Also Canadian Club mentioned Sione getting low. Sione was nowhere near even making the tackle, if no one was there CNK would have just waltzed through and it would have gone down as a miss for Sione so it's hardly a fair comparison. In that set, May and Twal tackle in almost the exact same fashion as Seyfarth had done (Twal even standing directly upright), it's just the players tackled were doing hit-ups while CNK was trying to evade. The only players that went low in that set were Api and Fainu and both times they failed to wrap up the ball, relying on another player to wrap it up or putting them in a position where they just don't.

For those arguing ill-discipline, personally I don't think so. He's just missed by like 10cm and the manner in which this miss happens it turns into a penalty. For me ill-discipline is throwing out a lazy arm (seyfarth 3 or 4 times last year) or just putting a late hit on someone for no reason (Tupouniua, Mahoney).

Furthermore, if we want to single out Seyfarth for his discipline/penalties then it would be completely unfair not to do so with others. Seyfarth is currently our 4th worst for min/penalty at 76, behind Latu (33), TDS (54.5), SamFainu (66.5) and 4th again for min/penalty or ruck infringement at 60.8 behind TDS (27.25), Latu (33) and May (45.67).

What Seyfarth conceded was only 2 points for what is an unfortunate penalty. However, without him we don't score that try before half time, so he's actually up 2 points. Additionally, TDS and Luai gave away a set restart each immediately after Sam Fainu became injured and while I think we were able to sub him off when SEYFARTH held up Egan over the line (well I guess he's up 6 points and I'm not even including conversions), but still we were unstructured and the Niokore try happened like 5 tackles after the set would have finished with some defensive line discipline initially.

Let's face it. This is a team sport and as a TEAM WE were not good enough. It is not one single players fault, nobody had a flawless game, but I feel everyone contributed something positive to the team and Seyfarth definitely contributed a lot.
 
Lazy - it was his 3rd tackle in that set alone. He was the best player on the field for our team - if some of the others showed that much effort we would win every week by plenty
Sounds like it was a tactic then if that was his third tackle that set.
CNK mentioned, tigers had been warned anymore high hits won’t be tolerated and will be penalised, he also mentioned Seyfarth is a tall figure.
I reckon CNK would run into Seyfarths shoulder if neither were crouching so obviously they were sending traffic his way trying to get him to mess up.
 
An email has gone around to all clubs indicating that high tackles will now be an automatic sin bin.
NRL head of football Graham Annesley emailed all 17 clubs on Monday afternoon about the issue, informing them that if there is direct and forceful contact and no mitigating factors, players will likely be binned for contact with the head.
They identified 4 incidents over the weekend that they deemed sin bin worthy.

1743426094312.jpeg
 
Last edited:
CC it is a technique lazy players use. Look at Ray Stone at the Dolphins always hits in the chest/Tigh areas, Lok at the nutter from the Roosters Radley same area. Jake t from Manly same area.
Yes but stone is a short ass and Jake isn’t much taller, much easier to not give away high tackles then the taller type!
 
Back
Top