Apr 21, 2014 #1 M Milky Well-known member Stats say he had no runs for no meters which means he either kicked or passed every time he got the ball, and all his kicks were rubush, p*ss him off!
Stats say he had no runs for no meters which means he either kicked or passed every time he got the ball, and all his kicks were rubush, p*ss him off!
Apr 21, 2014 #2 M Milky Well-known member @Milky said: Stats say he had no runs for no meters which means he either kicked or passed every time he got the ball, and all his kicks were rubush, p*ss him off! Click to expand...
@Milky said: Stats say he had no runs for no meters which means he either kicked or passed every time he got the ball, and all his kicks were rubush, p*ss him off! Click to expand...
Apr 21, 2014 #3 C Club_Sandwich New member 100% agree with you mate. He should see out the season on the bench, Austin should be given the starting spot from now on. Anasta has done a job for us over the years but it's time we look to the future.
100% agree with you mate. He should see out the season on the bench, Austin should be given the starting spot from now on. Anasta has done a job for us over the years but it's time we look to the future.
Apr 21, 2014 #4 G Guest Guest @Milky said: Stats say he had no runs for no meters which means he either kicked or passed every time he got the ball, and all his kicks were rubush, p*ss him off! Click to expand... Brillant observation, he does this every week. Austin was far more threatening when on the field.
@Milky said: Stats say he had no runs for no meters which means he either kicked or passed every time he got the ball, and all his kicks were rubush, p*ss him off! Click to expand... Brillant observation, he does this every week. Austin was far more threatening when on the field.
