Cosimo_Zaretti
New member
@hybrid_tiger said:This is incorrect. Anasta was signed by Sheens as our first choice #7, this was Sheens official line when the signing was announced. He was never signed as a depth player or an old head in the forwards signing. He was signed as a first choice halfback. It was an absurd signing.
You're quite right, we actually did tout Anasta as a number 7, what a train wreck. I'd forgotten about that act of Sheenius. At the time the rule seemed to be that Marshall owned the number 6 jersey, regardless of what role he was actually playing. We couldn't go saying "hey we just bought a spare 5/8th" now could we? That would have offended princess Benji.
Here's a Foxsport article written at the time. Some of the comments, mostly from Roosters fans, are gold.
http://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/nrl-premiership/braith-anasta-earmarked-for-halfback-role-when-he-moves-to-wests-tigers-for-2013-nrl-season/story-fn2mcuj6-1226315090007