GNR4LIFE
Well-known member
Christ, ok
John Simon
@Tigerlily
John Simon
@Tigerlily
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@Tigerlily said in [ARL\-The 90's\.\.](/post/1141866) said:Graig Wing...
@JD Tiger
@innsaneink said in [ARL\-The 90's\.\.](/post/1141832) said:@Fade-To-Black said in [ARL\-The 90's\.\.](/post/1141829) said:@innsaneink said in [ARL\-The 90's\.\.](/post/1141794) said:@tommythetigerfan said in [ARL\-The 90's\.\.](/post/1141787) said:hey, long time lurker here, just wanted to chime in to say this is quite an interesting thread to watch as a spectator.
have you tried getting funky with the criteria for future versions?
like maybe adding a 'salary cap'/budget so your fantasy 17 man side can't have over combined 750 career tries or have played combined over 2000 NRL games or something like that.
would definitely make things more complicated but would also add a lot of strategy and make it far easier to separate teams/players at the end as it seems a lot of people think all the sides will be way too similar in strength.
someone like Anthony mundine would become super valuable in that scenario. would add a cool dimension.
You can gladly take my spot
What's happened that's given you the irrits? IMO it's a good bit of fun
This is fun
What old mates proposing.... Having to research how many games & points each player has etc won't be fun to me... Each to their own
@Tigerlily said in [ARL\-The 90's\.\.](/post/1141875) said:Gawd!! 🥴🤔 Jason Stevens 🤞
@JD-Tiger
@Tigerlily said in [ARL\-The 90's\.\.](/post/1141875) said:Gawd!! 🥴🤔 Jason Stevens 🤞
@JD-Tiger
@hobbo1 said in [ARL\-The 90's\.\.](/post/1141868) said:@Tigerlily said in [ARL\-The 90's\.\.](/post/1141866) said:Graig Wing...
@JD Tiger
Already taken
@Fade-To-Black said in [ARL\-The 90's\.\.](/post/1141871) said:@innsaneink said in [ARL\-The 90's\.\.](/post/1141832) said:@Fade-To-Black said in [ARL\-The 90's\.\.](/post/1141829) said:@innsaneink said in [ARL\-The 90's\.\.](/post/1141794) said:@tommythetigerfan said in [ARL\-The 90's\.\.](/post/1141787) said:hey, long time lurker here, just wanted to chime in to say this is quite an interesting thread to watch as a spectator.
have you tried getting funky with the criteria for future versions?
like maybe adding a 'salary cap'/budget so your fantasy 17 man side can't have over combined 750 career tries or have played combined over 2000 NRL games or something like that.
would definitely make things more complicated but would also add a lot of strategy and make it far easier to separate teams/players at the end as it seems a lot of people think all the sides will be way too similar in strength.
someone like Anthony mundine would become super valuable in that scenario. would add a cool dimension.
You can gladly take my spot
What's happened that's given you the irrits? IMO it's a good bit of fun
This is fun
What old mates proposing.... Having to research how many games & points each player has etc won't be fun to me... Each to their own
Agree. Bit too in-depth.
@tommythetigerfan said in [ARL\-The 90's\.\.](/post/1141893) said:@Fade-To-Black said in [ARL\-The 90's\.\.](/post/1141871) said:@innsaneink said in [ARL\-The 90's\.\.](/post/1141832) said:@Fade-To-Black said in [ARL\-The 90's\.\.](/post/1141829) said:@innsaneink said in [ARL\-The 90's\.\.](/post/1141794) said:@tommythetigerfan said in [ARL\-The 90's\.\.](/post/1141787) said:hey, long time lurker here, just wanted to chime in to say this is quite an interesting thread to watch as a spectator.
have you tried getting funky with the criteria for future versions?
like maybe adding a 'salary cap'/budget so your fantasy 17 man side can't have over combined 750 career tries or have played combined over 2000 NRL games or something like that.
would definitely make things more complicated but would also add a lot of strategy and make it far easier to separate teams/players at the end as it seems a lot of people think all the sides will be way too similar in strength.
someone like Anthony mundine would become super valuable in that scenario. would add a cool dimension.
You can gladly take my spot
What's happened that's given you the irrits? IMO it's a good bit of fun
This is fun
What old mates proposing.... Having to research how many games & points each player has etc won't be fun to me... Each to their own
Agree. Bit too in-depth.
there are a websites out there that have databases of player stats you could easily sift through
you wouldn't have to necessarily wiki search every single player ha but yeah I get its a bit more homework
how about a draft where each of your 17 have to have played for a different club? and for players that played for more than 1, whichever club they played more games for would count as their club
@Chicken_Faced_Killa said in [ARL\-The 90's\.\.](/post/1141896) said:@tommythetigerfan said in [ARL\-The 90's\.\.](/post/1141893) said:@Fade-To-Black said in [ARL\-The 90's\.\.](/post/1141871) said:@innsaneink said in [ARL\-The 90's\.\.](/post/1141832) said:@Fade-To-Black said in [ARL\-The 90's\.\.](/post/1141829) said:@innsaneink said in [ARL\-The 90's\.\.](/post/1141794) said:@tommythetigerfan said in [ARL\-The 90's\.\.](/post/1141787) said:hey, long time lurker here, just wanted to chime in to say this is quite an interesting thread to watch as a spectator.
have you tried getting funky with the criteria for future versions?
like maybe adding a 'salary cap'/budget so your fantasy 17 man side can't have over combined 750 career tries or have played combined over 2000 NRL games or something like that.
would definitely make things more complicated but would also add a lot of strategy and make it far easier to separate teams/players at the end as it seems a lot of people think all the sides will be way too similar in strength.
someone like Anthony mundine would become super valuable in that scenario. would add a cool dimension.
You can gladly take my spot
What's happened that's given you the irrits? IMO it's a good bit of fun
This is fun
What old mates proposing.... Having to research how many games & points each player has etc won't be fun to me... Each to their own
Agree. Bit too in-depth.
there are a websites out there that have databases of player stats you could easily sift through
you wouldn't have to necessarily wiki search every single player ha but yeah I get its a bit more homework
how about a draft where each of your 17 have to have played for a different club? and for players that played for more than 1, whichever club they played more games for would count as their club
Jump in the next game (if there is one) and see how you feel about different elements after that. Some good ideas but may make things too complicated
@tommythetigerfan said in [ARL\-The 90's\.\.](/post/1141899) said:@Chicken_Faced_Killa said in [ARL\-The 90's\.\.](/post/1141896) said:@tommythetigerfan said in [ARL\-The 90's\.\.](/post/1141893) said:@Fade-To-Black said in [ARL\-The 90's\.\.](/post/1141871) said:@innsaneink said in [ARL\-The 90's\.\.](/post/1141832) said:@Fade-To-Black said in [ARL\-The 90's\.\.](/post/1141829) said:@innsaneink said in [ARL\-The 90's\.\.](/post/1141794) said:@tommythetigerfan said in [ARL\-The 90's\.\.](/post/1141787) said:hey, long time lurker here, just wanted to chime in to say this is quite an interesting thread to watch as a spectator.
have you tried getting funky with the criteria for future versions?
like maybe adding a 'salary cap'/budget so your fantasy 17 man side can't have over combined 750 career tries or have played combined over 2000 NRL games or something like that.
would definitely make things more complicated but would also add a lot of strategy and make it far easier to separate teams/players at the end as it seems a lot of people think all the sides will be way too similar in strength.
someone like Anthony mundine would become super valuable in that scenario. would add a cool dimension.
You can gladly take my spot
What's happened that's given you the irrits? IMO it's a good bit of fun
This is fun
What old mates proposing.... Having to research how many games & points each player has etc won't be fun to me... Each to their own
Agree. Bit too in-depth.
there are a websites out there that have databases of player stats you could easily sift through
you wouldn't have to necessarily wiki search every single player ha but yeah I get its a bit more homework
how about a draft where each of your 17 have to have played for a different club? and for players that played for more than 1, whichever club they played more games for would count as their club
Jump in the next game (if there is one) and see how you feel about different elements after that. Some good ideas but may make things too complicated
I've done a few cricket ones before - and honestly I found them a lot more fun once we started getting strategic with them(for example 'your XI's combined test batting average can't exceed 250' was a really fun one resulting in people having to really dig deep to find undervalued players)
I get cricket lends itself more to stat crunching then footy but I still see potential here!