Big name player in trouble

Just watched the video we'll it is bye bye Mitchell ..get your winter woollies out for the ESL…he is a grown man what a disgrace to himself his family and the code that has given him everything well done!
 
I just watched footage and I think he is a tool including his mates if they recorded this, but as far a dog act , from what I saw it was simulated action to make a statement for his audience and not the way it was presented in ACA leading up to the footage. I still think he needs action taken to wake him up …
 
Mitchell Pearce is a "Politis" protected species…

Here is what will happen:

Pearce will read a prepared statement apologizing to the NRL, Sponsors, Fans, club, animals of every species and his family. He will admit he was in the wrong and has learnt his lesson. He will go on to say his focus is now playing well for the Roosters, NSW and leading them to winning the SOO series and the Roosters to a premiership. He will be fined $50,000 by the NRL, which of course we all know Politis will pay for, the money will be donated to the RSPCA and AA....all this will be acceptable to the NRL... and everyone will hope the issue "goes away" fast

Here is what should happen:

He should have his contract torn up and his name marked "never to play NRL again".
 
@tigerap said:
Mitchell Pearce is a "Politis" protected species…

Here is what will happen:

Pearce will read a prepared statement apologizing to the NRL, Sponsors, Fans, club, animals of every species and his family. He will admit he was in the wrong and has learnt his lesson. He will go on to say his focus is now playing well for the Roosters, NSW and leading them to winning the SOO series and the Roosters to a premiership. He will be fined $50,000 by the NRL, which of course we all know Politis will pay for, the money will be donated to the RSPCA and AA....all this will be acceptable to the NRL... and everyone will hope the issue "goes away" fast

Here is what should happen:

He should have his contract torn up and his name marked "never to play NRL again".

Sounds likely. I am still waiting for Michael Jennings punishment to be announced by the integrity after he was found guilty of abusing a police officer. He was stood down for 1 week, but that was before the outcome of the court case.
 
I thought Pearce seemed pretty jovial for a totally paraletic drunk guy. It's certainly disgraceful and undignified but I wouldn't call it vile or immoral behaviour. Just like, the drunkest guy at the party. Pretending to hump a dog while drunk wouldn't rate in the top 50 of things I've seen drunk people do that was inappropriate.
 
@MacDougall said:
I thought Pearce seemed pretty jovial for a totally paraletic drunk guy. It's certainly disgraceful and undignified but I wouldn't call it vile or immoral behaviour. Just like, the drunkest guy at the party. Pretending to hump a dog while drunk wouldn't rate in the top 50 of things I've seen drunk people do that was inappropriate.

Will have to ask Joel Monahan that one ..he who had his NRL contract ripped up for exactly the same thing ..a president has been set and if Pearces contract is not ripped up one would imagine a massive payment will be being ask of the NRL by Mr Monahans lawyers as his career was ruined by the NRL and himself of course .
 
@Snake said:
@MacDougall said:
I thought Pearce seemed pretty jovial for a totally paraletic drunk guy. It's certainly disgraceful and undignified but I wouldn't call it vile or immoral behaviour. Just like, the drunkest guy at the party. Pretending to hump a dog while drunk wouldn't rate in the top 50 of things I've seen drunk people do that was inappropriate.

Will have to ask Joel Monahan that one ..he who had his NRL contract ripped up for exactly the same thing ..a president has been set and if Pearces contract is not ripped up one would imagine a massive payment will be being ask of the NRL by Mr Monahans lawyers as his career was ruined by the NRL and himself of course .

I never said he shouldn't have his contract terminated. He absolutely should. But I personally feel no ill will towards the guy. I don't feel like what he did was bad. Embarrassing and horrible for the code because of giving the media ammunition sure.
 
@MacDougall said:
I thought Pearce seemed pretty jovial for a totally paraletic drunk guy. It's certainly disgraceful and undignified but I wouldn't call it vile or immoral behaviour. Just like, the drunkest guy at the party. Pretending to hump a dog while drunk wouldn't rate in the top 50 of things I've seen drunk people do that was inappropriate.

I didnt think there was much innit either.

But the media driven nanny state we live in will end this kids career for acting like a tool at a private party.

I have seen far worse and done worse.
 
@LCA said:
@innsaneink said:
What type of dog was it? :neutral_face:

What's that supposed to mean? For some types of dogs it's ok?

Dude, molesting a maltese terrier is so much worse than trying it on with a great dane. You'd at least back the great dane to put up a fight. What's a dog you can hold in your hands gonna do?

Edit: I also have done worse. Not ashamed to admit it.
 
He tried to mack on with this chick who wasnt up for it…...then weed in his pants and then pretended to bang the said chicks dog who was trying to kick him it and he wasnt having a bar of it.

Looks like a very loose party!!
 
@ghost said:
He tried to mack on with this chick who wasnt up for it…...then weed in his pants and then pretended to bang the said chicks dog who was trying to kick him it and he wasnt having a bar of it.

Looks like a very loose party!!

Yeah no doubt especially when the chick at the end grabbed that dude and was like, "no this guy can stay… do you want to stay here with us"?

Was definitely some interesting events in that apartment that night.
 

Latest posts

Staff online

Back
Top