Most logiccal people understand that it's not possible to get decisions on a board passed without the board members being present aka the representatives from the HBG.. but let's keep ignoring that.
The reason given by Daniel Paton acting as the HBG spokesperson as to why the 4 independent board members were dismissed, suggested it was due certain decisions being made without them knowing.
So he is either suggesting the HBG representatives sitting on the Wests Tigers board were not passing on this information, or the decisions were being made without them knowing.
IF he is suggesting the HBG representatives were not passing on the information, why wouldn’t they have been dismissed along with the 4 independent board members ?
So at the moment you are among a chorus of fans all up in arms suggesting it is entirely the fault of the HBG for this latest unrest and media attention.
Maybe it is the HBG deliberately creating friction for no valid reason, that will soon be determined.
However if it is proven that decisions that should go to board level were being made (being approved) without them reaching board level, would that not then be a breach of conduct and the HBG would then have every right to be unhapppy about it ?
If that happened at any other company it would not be accepted, so why do we all just expect that IF THIS IS PROVEN TO BE TRUE that the HBG should have just grin and beared it not to cause any media attention ?
IF PROVEN TO BE TRUE wouldn’t the people involved in misconduct be the ones to blame ?
On the flip side if the comments made by the HBG spokesperson regarding the reason for the independent board member’s dismissal turn out to be fabricated, then a change of ownership would be the only realistic option moving forward.