breathe

@hodgo said in [breathe](/post/1195639) said:
@cochise said in [breathe](/post/1195258) said:
@Tcat said in [breathe](/post/1195224) said:
@cochise said in [breathe](/post/1195052) said:
@hodgo said in [breathe](/post/1195049) said:
I see everyone saying its been a ten year rebuild etc. And it will continue to be a rebuild unless we stick with a coach and a plan. We are in this situation because of constant change and lack of direction. Now we have direction and purpose. Truthfully the rebuild starts now

Starts now? Madge has been here for almost 2 years and we are starting the rebuild now, so how long do we have to wait, another 2, 3, 5 years?

I know it's frustrating mate and I'm sick of waiting too. The issue effecting Madges rebuild is these big contracts still on the books which are just killing us and no one wants to take them off our hands. Madge is battling with this roster and waiting for some serious funds to play with. All he can do is persist with a change in attitude in the meantime which isn't really getting through to some atm.

Yeah, was more reacting to the rebuild starts now line, there is more to a rebuild then simply getting rid of those big contracts and signing new players. That sort of rebuild won't work, and its not what madge is doing anyway. He started the rebuild the day he walked into the club.

I do have a few problems with how our rebuild is going but you can't say it hasn't started yet. I think people saying that are trying to buy Maguire more time, and no I'm not calling for him to be sacked.

I think so far we have been too reactive and not proactive enough in the player market. We have been mostly signing players who are getting released from other clubs, which to me shows a lack of planning. Where are the signings for next year, we have quite a bit of money for next season and the market has been open since November and nothing as really eventuated yet. Are we again we again waiting for players to be released.

Areas we are doing well in with our rebuild, is we are signing up good young players with potential, hopefully they pay off. The culture is slowly starting to improve, we do seem to be tougher mentally but then we still drop that in games where we are expected to win. Lastly some of our players are showing improvement in their games under Madge, mainly forwards, our skill players have regressed in my opinion.

All I was saying is our rebuild doesn't start now but started 2 years ago as seen by my post.

This is your detailed post?

*I think so far we have been too reactive and not proactive enough in the player market*
With what money? who was available that we had a chance at? Were you in the board room? Are we talking about madge who had a crakc at mitchell and instead got lucy, Bj, douhei etc. Are they improvements on what we had? Yes they have been all let go by other teams but who hasnt. For example lets take para they picked up, sivo, rcg, matterson, moses, brown, takarangai, jennings all from teams that had "let them go"

*Where are the signings for next year, we have quite a bit of money for next season and the market has been open since November and nothing as really eventuated yet.*
Who has been available that would have fixed our issues who would You have picked? Nearly every player resigned with their club outside of fafita who was never an option for us. How do you know we didn't talk to 30 people and just didn't pan out.

Then you contradict your above statement by saying we have signed well with young players. Maybe our focus is to get young players because the older ones are unattainable at a price we can or are willing to afford.

*Lastly some of our players are showing improvement in their games under Madge, mainly forwards, our skill players have regressed in my opinion*

Ok so the area we have whinged about being weak in for years the forwards have improved. Awesome

Which skilled players have regressed i would struggle to name one.

This isn't detailed mate its as general as general gets.

Would take to long tonight to go into a detailed analysis of my opinion so ill do a general one.

The club has had some horrible experiences over the last 10 years.
We signed potter which was a risky move and it turned out bad.
Signing Taylor literally lost us our 4 best players at the time. This was our youth, our juniors, and our hope for the future.
It also cost us a tonne of bad publicity and negative raps from the league due to our handling of Robbie whether you are a fan or not.
Added to this during this time we have the disaster that was the west tiger's board with the Balmain saga and the consistent internal fighting.
Massive set backs both on and off the field leading to an average roster.
Out of all this, we find some stability with Pascoe and Go. They give us a huge leg up financially and set huge goals which they achieve e.g coe, solid sponsorship and board stability.
We boot taylor, Finally have minimal bad contracts club, fans and players buy into our new coach's ideas and philosophy. Due to his conversations on loyalty and buying in he is allowed to sign 4 dudes to massive lengthy contracts as they fit his philosophy. Surely its time a good coach with players HE wants in a system he has total control over.

You know the story so now we are back at the start
Half a salary cap, No juniors coming through, injured players on massive contracts. No coach a bog average roster, a ceo who was punished and cost us even more of what little salary cap we have.

In walk s coach Madge.
Hires super strong support staff.
Starts changing a culture that has had a soft underbelly for 10 years.
Does his best to sign a high profile player in Latrell
signs 10 amazingly talented young juniors from other clubs.
Has a plan from juniors through to first grade.
Has set a focus on producing local juniors.
Holds players accountable.
Shows emotion.
ISnt happy with the status quo and shows it.
Has signed decent players on decent contracts.

So am i optimistic? yeah, I am because after all those years we were a basket cases we have a chance to finally come out the other end. We have clear goals, we have a developing identity, we have a future in player development, we have a solid coaching recruitment staff.

So while not super detailed that is were my optimism comes from. Jumping up and down about where we were in the past has zero benefit.

Its the same reason we study history in schools, it so we dont make the same mistakes again.

Seriously? Our Dally M halfback of the year is now a bench player who's only option is run, our 5/8th has been dropped, Mbye has deteriorated massively. Name one skill player that has improved? Noffa has improved but I don't consider him a skill player. I'm a Maguire fan but I still need to see more before I can say we have turned the corner.

I want to see us beat the teams we should beat, I want to see us play finals football. We are still mentally weak, we still fold under pressure, we have had too many false dawns to trumpet anything yet, we keep making the same mistakes time and again.

Madge has improved the forwards, made some good signings, but also some panic signings which concern me. Do I think he is the guy that will get us to finals? Yes I truly believe he will, but we actually have to achieve an improvement before I can say we are moving forward, we are still mentally weak.

I will also state, that me jumping up and down on here about the past has no benefit, you are correct, but I will also say that you being all rosy and positive on here has the same benefit, in fact nothing anyone says on here has any effect whatsoever on the club.
 
@Sart0ri said in [breathe](/post/1194981) said:
My argument was that you can only have one star player on overs without needing a lot of lower level players to balance the salary cap.
$1.2M a year for Keary sounds good to me, over 4 years he would be getting over $1M more with us. If only there was a draft to stop the top teams staying on top.

Jimmy Maloney...that guy eats premierships for breakfast
 
@weststigers said in [breathe](/post/1195721) said:
@Sart0ri said in [breathe](/post/1194981) said:
My argument was that you can only have one star player on overs without needing a lot of lower level players to balance the salary cap.
$1.2M a year for Keary sounds good to me, over 4 years he would be getting over $1M more with us. If only there was a draft to stop the top teams staying on top.

Jimmy Maloney...that guy eats premierships for breakfast

I'd agree except he is now 34.
 
@cochise said in [breathe](/post/1195725) said:
@weststigers said in [breathe](/post/1195721) said:
@Sart0ri said in [breathe](/post/1194981) said:
My argument was that you can only have one star player on overs without needing a lot of lower level players to balance the salary cap.
$1.2M a year for Keary sounds good to me, over 4 years he would be getting over $1M more with us. If only there was a draft to stop the top teams staying on top.

Jimmy Maloney...that guy eats premierships for breakfast

I'd agree except he is now 34.

Who cares...Super Cronk was 35...
 
@weststigers said in [breathe](/post/1195726) said:
@cochise said in [breathe](/post/1195725) said:
@weststigers said in [breathe](/post/1195721) said:
@Sart0ri said in [breathe](/post/1194981) said:
My argument was that you can only have one star player on overs without needing a lot of lower level players to balance the salary cap.
$1.2M a year for Keary sounds good to me, over 4 years he would be getting over $1M more with us. If only there was a draft to stop the top teams staying on top.

Jimmy Maloney...that guy eats premierships for breakfast

I'd agree except he is now 34.

Who cares...Super Cronk was 35...

Because you are taking a risk on any 34 year old, including Cronk. He is also a very different player than Cronk and relies a lot more on his speed than Cronk ever did. He is much more of gunslinger type player who keeps taking chances no matter the outcome, most of those sorts of players do not age that well.
 
@cochise said in [breathe](/post/1195728) said:
@weststigers said in [breathe](/post/1195726) said:
@cochise said in [breathe](/post/1195725) said:
@weststigers said in [breathe](/post/1195721) said:
@Sart0ri said in [breathe](/post/1194981) said:
My argument was that you can only have one star player on overs without needing a lot of lower level players to balance the salary cap.
$1.2M a year for Keary sounds good to me, over 4 years he would be getting over $1M more with us. If only there was a draft to stop the top teams staying on top.

Jimmy Maloney...that guy eats premierships for breakfast

I'd agree except he is now 34.

Who cares...Super Cronk was 35...

Because you are taking a risk on any 34 year old, including Cronk. He is also a very different player than Cronk and relies a lot more on his speed than Cronk ever did. He is much more of gunslinger type player who keeps taking chances no matter the outcome, most of those sorts of players do not age that well.

Ok coach
 
@weststigers said in [breathe](/post/1195729) said:
@cochise said in [breathe](/post/1195728) said:
@weststigers said in [breathe](/post/1195726) said:
@cochise said in [breathe](/post/1195725) said:
@weststigers said in [breathe](/post/1195721) said:
@Sart0ri said in [breathe](/post/1194981) said:
My argument was that you can only have one star player on overs without needing a lot of lower level players to balance the salary cap.
$1.2M a year for Keary sounds good to me, over 4 years he would be getting over $1M more with us. If only there was a draft to stop the top teams staying on top.

Jimmy Maloney...that guy eats premierships for breakfast

I'd agree except he is now 34.

Who cares...Super Cronk was 35...

Because you are taking a risk on any 34 year old, including Cronk. He is also a very different player than Cronk and relies a lot more on his speed than Cronk ever did. He is much more of gunslinger type player who keeps taking chances no matter the outcome, most of those sorts of players do not age that well.

Ok coach

Good reply lol, just having a discussion with you.
 
@cochise said in [breathe](/post/1195730) said:
@weststigers said in [breathe](/post/1195729) said:
@cochise said in [breathe](/post/1195728) said:
@weststigers said in [breathe](/post/1195726) said:
@cochise said in [breathe](/post/1195725) said:
@weststigers said in [breathe](/post/1195721) said:
@Sart0ri said in [breathe](/post/1194981) said:
My argument was that you can only have one star player on overs without needing a lot of lower level players to balance the salary cap.
$1.2M a year for Keary sounds good to me, over 4 years he would be getting over $1M more with us. If only there was a draft to stop the top teams staying on top.

Jimmy Maloney...that guy eats premierships for breakfast

I'd agree except he is now 34.

Who cares...Super Cronk was 35...

Because you are taking a risk on any 34 year old, including Cronk. He is also a very different player than Cronk and relies a lot more on his speed than Cronk ever did. He is much more of gunslinger type player who keeps taking chances no matter the outcome, most of those sorts of players do not age that well.

Ok coach

Good reply lol, just having a discussion with you.

Glad you enjoyed it
 
@weststigers said in [breathe](/post/1195732) said:
@cochise said in [breathe](/post/1195730) said:
@weststigers said in [breathe](/post/1195729) said:
@cochise said in [breathe](/post/1195728) said:
@weststigers said in [breathe](/post/1195726) said:
@cochise said in [breathe](/post/1195725) said:
@weststigers said in [breathe](/post/1195721) said:
@Sart0ri said in [breathe](/post/1194981) said:
My argument was that you can only have one star player on overs without needing a lot of lower level players to balance the salary cap.
$1.2M a year for Keary sounds good to me, over 4 years he would be getting over $1M more with us. If only there was a draft to stop the top teams staying on top.

Jimmy Maloney...that guy eats premierships for breakfast

I'd agree except he is now 34.

Who cares...Super Cronk was 35...

Because you are taking a risk on any 34 year old, including Cronk. He is also a very different player than Cronk and relies a lot more on his speed than Cronk ever did. He is much more of gunslinger type player who keeps taking chances no matter the outcome, most of those sorts of players do not age that well.

Ok coach

Good reply lol, just having a discussion with you.

Glad you enjoyed it

Yeah I did, its like you just gave up lol
 
@cochise said in [breathe](/post/1195734) said:
@weststigers said in [breathe](/post/1195732) said:
@cochise said in [breathe](/post/1195730) said:
@weststigers said in [breathe](/post/1195729) said:
@cochise said in [breathe](/post/1195728) said:
@weststigers said in [breathe](/post/1195726) said:
@cochise said in [breathe](/post/1195725) said:
@weststigers said in [breathe](/post/1195721) said:
@Sart0ri said in [breathe](/post/1194981) said:
My argument was that you can only have one star player on overs without needing a lot of lower level players to balance the salary cap.
$1.2M a year for Keary sounds good to me, over 4 years he would be getting over $1M more with us. If only there was a draft to stop the top teams staying on top.

Jimmy Maloney...that guy eats premierships for breakfast

I'd agree except he is now 34.

Who cares...Super Cronk was 35...

Because you are taking a risk on any 34 year old, including Cronk. He is also a very different player than Cronk and relies a lot more on his speed than Cronk ever did. He is much more of gunslinger type player who keeps taking chances no matter the outcome, most of those sorts of players do not age that well.

Ok coach

Good reply lol, just having a discussion with you.

Glad you enjoyed it

Yeah I did, its like you just gave up lol

I'm just not averse to having a seasoned playmaker as backup on minimal cash like we do with Marshall. His age makes him low cost, but It's good backup and guys like that will do a job for us when needed.

Having Marshall (and Reynolds at times) has been good for us. Imagine if we had Brooks and Walters all season without any first grade standard backup...we'd essentially be the Bulldogs.

It's all I'm saying.

lol...
 
@weststigers said in [breathe](/post/1195735) said:
@cochise said in [breathe](/post/1195734) said:
@weststigers said in [breathe](/post/1195732) said:
@cochise said in [breathe](/post/1195730) said:
@weststigers said in [breathe](/post/1195729) said:
@cochise said in [breathe](/post/1195728) said:
@weststigers said in [breathe](/post/1195726) said:
@cochise said in [breathe](/post/1195725) said:
@weststigers said in [breathe](/post/1195721) said:
@Sart0ri said in [breathe](/post/1194981) said:
My argument was that you can only have one star player on overs without needing a lot of lower level players to balance the salary cap.
$1.2M a year for Keary sounds good to me, over 4 years he would be getting over $1M more with us. If only there was a draft to stop the top teams staying on top.

Jimmy Maloney...that guy eats premierships for breakfast

I'd agree except he is now 34.

Who cares...Super Cronk was 35...

Because you are taking a risk on any 34 year old, including Cronk. He is also a very different player than Cronk and relies a lot more on his speed than Cronk ever did. He is much more of gunslinger type player who keeps taking chances no matter the outcome, most of those sorts of players do not age that well.

Ok coach

Good reply lol, just having a discussion with you.

Glad you enjoyed it

Yeah I did, its like you just gave up lol

I'm just not averse to having a seasoned playmaker as backup on minimal cash like we do with Marshall. His age makes him low cost, but It's good backup and guys like that will do a job for us when needed.

Having Marshall (and Reynolds at times) has been good for us. Imagine if we had Brooks and Walters all season without any first grade standard backup...we'd essentially be the Bulldogs.

It's all I'm saying.

lol...

Agree 100% I thought you were suggesting chasing Maloney as a marquee player instead of Keary. Walters tries hard but really lack creativity in the halves, probably why he has taken so long to make NRL level. I really would love Keary or Munster to sign with us, but don't see it happening so looks like we might be waiting and hoping for younger players to reach their potential again.
 
Its interesting that Parra who are supposedly one of the gun sides looked very flat against the dogs. Same as us they jumped to a an early lead then ran out of steam. I think the game last week had a big effect on both sides this week.
 
No excuses we lost a game against a side that is a hodge podge of talent from other clubs with nothing to play for

Agree we looked stale ...but we had back up in the positions that needed resting

And now that window has gone ..great stuff
 
@diedpretty said in [breathe](/post/1195765) said:
Its interesting that Parra who are supposedly one of the gun sides looked very flat against the dogs. Same as us they jumped to a an early lead then ran out of steam. I think the game last week had a big effect on both sides this week.

I agree mate alot of the top teams really struggled this weekend the difference with them and us is they found a way to win we are still learning that imo.
 
@happy_tiger said in [breathe](/post/1195768) said:
No excuses we lost a game against a side that is a hodge podge of talent from other clubs with nothing to play for

Agree we looked stale ...but we had back up in the positions that needed resting

And now that window has gone ..great stuff

x2

fans just want some consistency, no more fluff, have the cattle to make the finals this year but yet again we failed.
 
@diedpretty said in [breathe](/post/1195765) said:
Its interesting that Parra who are supposedly one of the gun sides looked very flat against the dogs. Same as us they jumped to a an early lead then ran out of steam. I think the game last week had a big effect on both sides this week.

difference is they still won
 
@cochise said in [breathe](/post/1194924) said:
@JoshColeman99 said in [breathe](/post/1194922) said:
@cochise said in [breathe](/post/1194913) said:
@JoshColeman99 said in [breathe](/post/1194904) said:
Our roster still isn’t a top 8 roster that’s for sure. Rebuilds take a long time and Madge has only been here a season and a half.

It’s hard to be patient when it’s been so long but it is a slow long process unfortunately.

We are in one never ending rebuild.

That’s what happens when there’s a new coach every 18 months. Just gotta stick it out with Madge and if they don’t want to do that, sack him now and bring someone else in.

I think a 9 year rebuild is long enough.

It would be if it was one rebuild.

The trouble is before Madge, the others were building without any foundations.

Rebuilds with straw and sticks if you will.

This one is on it's way to a rebuild of bricks.
 
@Tigerbuck63 said in [breathe](/post/1194995) said:
@supercoach said in [breathe](/post/1194783) said:
Where I agree with the post, that what we are getting is what you would expect from our squad, given the class of player we have at our disposal, but......this is nothing new, all our weaknesses have been there for a long long time and nothing much seems to be happening to rectify the problem. Goal kicking,speed, the spine and a forward leader have been out Achilles heel for years.

I guess attracting players to the club is our major problem and how do you fix that is anyone guess, but paying massive overs is probably the only possibly way.

Next year without some miracle recruitment we will be in even a bigger hole....very hard to be upbeat and positive


Lets also put last nights game into perspective, what's the main reason we are all so disappointed - We lost again to a team that we were expected to win by +13.5
This is the story of our club most years, compete hard against the better clubs fall just short, win a couple with upsets, and play poorly against bottom teams that eventually determine our fate of not making the 8 again.

Yes our Roster is improving but we still have the same players over many seasons now that can't take us to the next level.
Brooks, Marshall, Mybe, Reynolds, Nofo , Garner, with no recognized hooker.
The coaches spray at half time is non inspirational, we were in front.
So it now comes down to having a spine and game management, forwards i think are better, and dare i say it again but a better coach.

You must have lived a sheltered life if you played RL and never got a spray when you were in front.
 
@cochise said in [breathe](/post/1195052) said:
@hodgo said in [breathe](/post/1195049) said:
I see everyone saying its been a ten year rebuild etc. And it will continue to be a rebuild unless we stick with a coach and a plan. We are in this situation because of constant change and lack of direction. Now we have direction and purpose. Truthfully the rebuild starts now

Starts now? Madge has been here for almost 2 years and we are starting the rebuild now, so how long do we have to wait, another 2, 3, 5 years?

Come on Cochise, you are just stirring people here with those comments. As you like to do.

Would like to think at least that you don't believe what you wrote. You are not a silly man.
 
@Russell said in [breathe](/post/1195916) said:
@Tigerbuck63 said in [breathe](/post/1194995) said:
@supercoach said in [breathe](/post/1194783) said:
Where I agree with the post, that what we are getting is what you would expect from our squad, given the class of player we have at our disposal, but......this is nothing new, all our weaknesses have been there for a long long time and nothing much seems to be happening to rectify the problem. Goal kicking,speed, the spine and a forward leader have been out Achilles heel for years.

I guess attracting players to the club is our major problem and how do you fix that is anyone guess, but paying massive overs is probably the only possibly way.

Next year without some miracle recruitment we will be in even a bigger hole....very hard to be upbeat and positive


Lets also put last nights game into perspective, what's the main reason we are all so disappointed - We lost again to a team that we were expected to win by +13.5
This is the story of our club most years, compete hard against the better clubs fall just short, win a couple with upsets, and play poorly against bottom teams that eventually determine our fate of not making the 8 again.

Yes our Roster is improving but we still have the same players over many seasons now that can't take us to the next level.
Brooks, Marshall, Mybe, Reynolds, Nofo , Garner, with no recognized hooker.
The coaches spray at half time is non inspirational, we were in front.
So it now comes down to having a spine and game management, forwards i think are better, and dare i say it again but a better coach.

You must have lived a sheltered life if you played RL and never got a spray when you were in front.


No Russell i did'nt it was more about the game plan, were we achieving it, should we alter, who do we need to target, plus as Captain i use to talk as well and valued others players input. It was about the Team performance not individuals.
sadly we have a captain that does not talk nor he listens, Cheers.
 
Back
Top