Bring back the Demps

Status
Not open for further replies.
@cochise said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377137) said:
@mikey said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377131) said:
While we are on this topic of appropriacy for the forum I have noticed a lot more posts with either disguised swearing or actual mild swearing not being deleted in the last three weeks or so.

I had a post with disguised deleted about a month ago - it deserved it if the rule is absolutely no swearing but now I'm a little confused. Is some disguised swearing acceptable? Is mild swearing acceptable?
Could we have clarification around that?

=

I can only really speak for myself but will no longer be deleting disguised swearing. It still breaches forum guidelines so if you do post in that manner you still run the risk of it being deleted.

Having danced around with them myself, I still think there has to be a line on everything, such as if someone decides to declare open season on their use, littering paragraphs with them etcetera.

Will be good though to be able to utilise bullcrap or similar without worry and if the old **wtf?** Emoji was returned it would make it even simpler.
 
I got banned for 3 weeks and it said i was a previously banned member. I got no idea how i was previously banned when i had only just joined..
But such is life and my pennance ended today though still scratching me head as to why i got banned in the first place
 
@mikey said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377142) said:
@cochise said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377137) said:
@mikey said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377131) said:
While we are on this topic of appropriacy for the forum I have noticed a lot more posts with either disguised swearing or actual mild swearing not being deleted in the last three weeks or so.

I had a post with disguised deleted about a month ago - it deserved it if the rule is absolutely no swearing but now I'm a little confused. Is some disguised swearing acceptable? Is mild swearing acceptable?
Could we have clarification around that?

=

I can only really speak for myself but will no longer be deleting disguised swearing. It still breaches forum guidelines so if you do post in that manner you still run the risk of it being deleted.

I understand you don't have a problem with it 🙂

I do get it when people are venting frustration and sometimes go too far (done it myself) but given the site does try to accommodate all ages, genders etc am glad there are standards.

Kul - what are your thoughts on it these days? Happy with whatever you decide but just seeking clarity so I can stay within the guidelines.

@Kul Good luck getting a response out of him. He won't engage with the moderators on here.
 
@diedpretty said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1376974) said:
@geo said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1376973) said:
Well when you infer a Woman only got her job because she is a [This word has been automatically removed] and then post Meme's of Miss Piggy as said woman it crosses a line in this day and age..

I didn't ban Demps and personally have no problem with him but I do support the moderator decision to ban ..

Some say it's spice ..some find it offensive

**Don't fret he will be back.**.

When he comes back can there be a proviso he only post once every 2 minutes and it must be on topic.

I had a few of my posts deleted last year which imo could have only been for being slightly of topic when replying to a post.
I have a feeling over the last couple of weeks being slightly off topic has been relaxed which is great, as long as it doesnt go on for too long.
In general, I feel the whole atmosphere on here has become much more relaxed, so you Mods must be doing a good job.
 
@dwight-schrute said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1376987) said:
@innsaneink said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1376961) said:
@telltails said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1376909) said:
I have no idea why Demps got banned but I have no problems with the way the site runs.

Love the site and the people that run it but some of the rules on swearing are quite hypocritical

I'm happy enough with the rules. A quick visit to the out of control Bulldogs site will quickly let you know that this is the better route to travel.
Demps does add another interesting dimension on here so I hope he's back soon.

Demps **is** a very interesting guy.
He can be funny, thoughtful, supportive, encouraging and caring.
But on the other hand it seems he can be like my other half, who has a **lot** of trouble controlling her negative emotions.
 
@willow said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377173) said:
@mikey said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377142) said:
@cochise said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377137) said:
@mikey said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377131) said:
While we are on this topic of appropriacy for the forum I have noticed a lot more posts with either disguised swearing or actual mild swearing not being deleted in the last three weeks or so.

I had a post with disguised deleted about a month ago - it deserved it if the rule is absolutely no swearing but now I'm a little confused. Is some disguised swearing acceptable? Is mild swearing acceptable?
Could we have clarification around that?

=

I can only really speak for myself but will no longer be deleting disguised swearing. It still breaches forum guidelines so if you do post in that manner you still run the risk of it being deleted.

I understand you don't have a problem with it 🙂

I do get it when people are venting frustration and sometimes go too far (done it myself) but given the site does try to accommodate all ages, genders etc am glad there are standards.

Kul - what are your thoughts on it these days? Happy with whatever you decide but just seeking clarity so I can stay within the guidelines.

@Kul Good luck getting a response out of him. He won't engage with the moderators on here.

Noted 🙂
 
@willow said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377071) said:
If @Kul has any commonsense he'll make the ban permanent. Demps has had more than enough chances on this forum and is unable to conform and post appropriately. Last night typified that.

That's disappointing to hear Willow.

This place and control of the domain shouldn't belong to any single person.
 
I'm yet to confirm this .....

Luke Burt is dating Yvonne Sampson

I love Demps , but he probably overstepped the mark

And the need to swear ...what a load of BS ...really

If you need to swear to make your argument more convincing ...move on ...seriously
 
@happy_tiger said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377237) said:
I'm yet to confirm this .....

Luke Burt is dating Yvonne Sampson

I love Demps , but he probably overstepped the mark

And the need to swear ...what a load of BS ...really

If you need to swear to make your argument more convincing ...move on ...seriously

Am I missing something?
Didn't she get married about a year ago?
 
@happy_tiger said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377237) said:
I'm yet to confirm this .....

Luke Burt is dating Yvonne Sampson

I love Demps , but he probably overstepped the mark

And the need to swear ...what a load of BS ...really

If you need to swear to make your argument more convincing ...move on ...seriously

spoken like a true scholar
 
@mikey said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377142) said:
@cochise said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377137) said:
@mikey said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377131) said:
While we are on this topic of appropriacy for the forum I have noticed a lot more posts with either disguised swearing or actual mild swearing not being deleted in the last three weeks or so.

I had a post with disguised deleted about a month ago - it deserved it if the rule is absolutely no swearing but now I'm a little confused. Is some disguised swearing acceptable? Is mild swearing acceptable?
Could we have clarification around that?

=

I can only really speak for myself but will no longer be deleting disguised swearing. It still breaches forum guidelines so if you do post in that manner you still run the risk of it being deleted.

I understand you don't have a problem with it 🙂

I do get it when people are venting frustration and sometimes go too far (done it myself) but given the site does try to accommodate all ages, genders etc am glad there are standards.

Kul - what are your thoughts on it these days? Happy with whatever you decide but just seeking clarity so I can stay within the guidelines.

an after hours free 4 all in a bbd athon
 
@merlot said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377259) said:
@mikey said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377142) said:
@cochise said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377137) said:
@mikey said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377131) said:
While we are on this topic of appropriacy for the forum I have noticed a lot more posts with either disguised swearing or actual mild swearing not being deleted in the last three weeks or so.

I had a post with disguised deleted about a month ago - it deserved it if the rule is absolutely no swearing but now I'm a little confused. Is some disguised swearing acceptable? Is mild swearing acceptable?
Could we have clarification around that?

=

I can only really speak for myself but will no longer be deleting disguised swearing. It still breaches forum guidelines so if you do post in that manner you still run the risk of it being deleted.

I understand you don't have a problem with it 🙂

I do get it when people are venting frustration and sometimes go too far (done it myself) but given the site does try to accommodate all ages, genders etc am glad there are standards.

Kul - what are your thoughts on it these days? Happy with whatever you decide but just seeking clarity so I can stay within the guidelines.

an after hours free 4 all in a bbd athon

free 4 all I get but bbd?
 
@mikey said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377260) said:
@merlot said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377259) said:
@mikey said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377142) said:
@cochise said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377137) said:
@mikey said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377131) said:
While we are on this topic of appropriacy for the forum I have noticed a lot more posts with either disguised swearing or actual mild swearing not being deleted in the last three weeks or so.

I had a post with disguised deleted about a month ago - it deserved it if the rule is absolutely no swearing but now I'm a little confused. Is some disguised swearing acceptable? Is mild swearing acceptable?
Could we have clarification around that?

=

I can only really speak for myself but will no longer be deleting disguised swearing. It still breaches forum guidelines so if you do post in that manner you still run the risk of it being deleted.

I understand you don't have a problem with it 🙂

I do get it when people are venting frustration and sometimes go too far (done it myself) but given the site does try to accommodate all ages, genders etc am glad there are standards.

Kul - what are your thoughts on it these days? Happy with whatever you decide but just seeking clarity so I can stay within the guidelines.

an after hours free 4 all in a bbd athon

free 4 all I get but bbd?

its all in the thread
 
@willow said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377173) said:
@mikey said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377142) said:
@cochise said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377137) said:
@mikey said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377131) said:
While we are on this topic of appropriacy for the forum I have noticed a lot more posts with either disguised swearing or actual mild swearing not being deleted in the last three weeks or so.

I had a post with disguised deleted about a month ago - it deserved it if the rule is absolutely no swearing but now I'm a little confused. Is some disguised swearing acceptable? Is mild swearing acceptable?
Could we have clarification around that?

=

I can only really speak for myself but will no longer be deleting disguised swearing. It still breaches forum guidelines so if you do post in that manner you still run the risk of it being deleted.

I understand you don't have a problem with it 🙂

I do get it when people are venting frustration and sometimes go too far (done it myself) but given the site does try to accommodate all ages, genders etc am glad there are standards.

Kul - what are your thoughts on it these days? Happy with whatever you decide but just seeking clarity so I can stay within the guidelines.

@Kul Good luck getting a response out of him. He won't engage with the moderators on here.

Engage with mods whatsoever or specifically on this thread? Given the number of years and thousands of hours moderating posts I certainly hope you're not talking about the former.
 
@aj1 said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377264) said:
@willow said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377173) said:
@mikey said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377142) said:
@cochise said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377137) said:
@mikey said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377131) said:
While we are on this topic of appropriacy for the forum I have noticed a lot more posts with either disguised swearing or actual mild swearing not being deleted in the last three weeks or so.

I had a post with disguised deleted about a month ago - it deserved it if the rule is absolutely no swearing but now I'm a little confused. Is some disguised swearing acceptable? Is mild swearing acceptable?
Could we have clarification around that?

=

I can only really speak for myself but will no longer be deleting disguised swearing. It still breaches forum guidelines so if you do post in that manner you still run the risk of it being deleted.

I understand you don't have a problem with it 🙂

I do get it when people are venting frustration and sometimes go too far (done it myself) but given the site does try to accommodate all ages, genders etc am glad there are standards.

Kul - what are your thoughts on it these days? Happy with whatever you decide but just seeking clarity so I can stay within the guidelines.

@Kul Good luck getting a response out of him. He won't engage with the moderators on here.

Engage with mods whatsoever or specifically on this thread? Given the number of years and thousands of hours moderating posts I certainly hope you're not talking about the former.

Former..
 
@gnr4life said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377114) said:
I love Demps, but sometimes it’s good to be free of him for a little while. Can be a bit much sometimes.

He sure made up for lost time.
It seemed every second post was one of his.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Members online

Back
Top