Brooks into the nine

Status
Not open for further replies.

Tim Sheens

Well-known member
Disrupting the young halves is certainly not the choice I would have made, particularly when we had buggar all go forward.
 
that was a shambles… especially to bring siro into the halves. Siro gives good enough service to have straight swapped into hooker.
 
Might have been an attempt to get Siro to do something….

One of the worst performances i have seen in my life. Embarrassing game.

_Posted using RoarFEED 4.2.0_
 
Cherrington should have played,Halatau could play backrow, and hooker if Cherrington needed a break,another poor choice from our coach,which is becoming a regular occurrence.
 
@hybrid_tiger said:
Taupau at 9 was even better. SuperCoach Taylor.

While we are on Taupau.. Talyor has to get a set a put him back on the bench the guy is an impact player has no motor to much muscle!
 
@formerguest said:
Disrupting the young halves is certainly not the choice I would have made, particularly when we had buggar all go forward.

My opinion of Taylor went down a lot after doing that.
We have a brilliant No.9 playing NSW cup but I guess he would have shown some spark in attack and at the moment we are all about defence.
 
@Geo. said:
Thought we actually looked better…meh

While I agree it was a very odd move by Taylor I agree with u that it was the period we looked the best.

I have a little conspiracy theory on the move though. Maybe the argument of Moses or Martin isn't the real argument. Maybe it should be Martin or Cherrington? Could Taylor be looking to life after Farah with Brooks at 9, Moses at 7 and Martin at 6 leaving Cherrington out?
 
@king sirro said:
@Geo. said:
Thought we actually looked better…meh

While I agree it was a very odd move by Taylor I agree with u that it was the period we looked the best.

I have a little conspiracy theory on the move though. Maybe the argument of Moses or Martin isn't the real argument. Maybe it should be Martin or Cherrington? Could Taylor be looking to life after Farah with Brooks at 9, Moses at 7 and Martin at 6 leaving Cherrington out?

Why should he be worrying about life after Farah.. its several years away before he retires or moves on. IFFFF we had a good and effective forward pack, cherrington could be coming off the bench to give Farah a rest and add more spark.
 
@king sirro said:
@Geo. said:
Thought we actually looked better…meh

While I agree it was a very odd move by Taylor I agree with u that it was the period we looked the best.

I have a little conspiracy theory on the move though. Maybe the argument of Moses or Martin isn't the real argument. Maybe it should be Martin or Cherrington? Could Taylor be looking to life after Farah with Brooks at 9, Moses at 7 and Martin at 6 leaving Cherrington out?

I'm thinking the move was to continue improving brooks defence… I agree Tapau would be best coming of bench as impact player but we don't have the depth to put him there at the moment.
 
@simonthetiger said:
@Geo. said:
Thought we actually looked better…meh

Yeah we looked better cos Moses got to play some freaking footy instead of tackling second rowers and putting up huge bombs for the sake of taylorgate!

Moses actually does a pretty good job at tackling second rowers and putting up bombs but its just dumb.

The coach really needs a kick up the ass.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Members online

Back
Top