Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@Jedi_Tiger said in [Brooks\.\.\.\. what is he good for??](/post/1179227) said:please dont use history to back that up as benji Lawrence and Nofo were also passengers in the Tigers good ship semi final train over the last 6 years
@TrueTiger said in [Brooks\.\.\.\. what is he good for??](/post/1178071) said:@Tiger5150 said in [Brooks\.\.\.\. what is he good for??](/post/1177913) said:@TrueTiger said in [Brooks\.\.\.\. what is he good for??](/post/1177841) said:@Tiger5150 said in [Brooks\.\.\.\. what is he good for??](/post/1177670) said:@Strongee said in [Brooks\.\.\.\. what is he good for??](/post/1177656) said:@Tiger5150 said in [Brooks\.\.\.\. what is he good for??](/post/1177651) said:@TrueTiger said in [Brooks\.\.\.\. what is he good for??](/post/1177643) said:Come on Strongee,you don't have to name call us because we differ from your opinion...
Yeah......Keyboard coaches.....smh
Who’s a keyboard coach ? You’re getting in an echo chamber about how crap he is . And it has about as much grasp with reality as flat earth.
He’s not crap . He’s good . He’s not elite. Has a lot of improving to do . And he’s paid as an above average player . He’s not paid a 1 mil . He’s paid 600-700 , which is value for what he provides .
That’s the end of discussion . There is not 1 half that is remotely close to available that anyone in their right mind would swap him for .
It’s not an opinion if it’s outrageous. And there’s infinite stats that back me up , as well as the obvious stat of how rubbish we looked with benji and josh in rounds 1 and 2 .
Strongee, I owe you an explanation and an apology. I agree with you 1000%. I was actually having a go at True Tigers hypocrisy, where he had a go at you for "name calling" whereas in another thread he calls anyone who isnt a fan of Josh Reynolds "armchair coaches". The irony escapes him and doesnt translate well over two different threads.
Onward mate, keep fighting the fight.
Tiger5150,you are right I called some people keyboard coaches,however I didn't call them morons ..***.big difference*** ..I used a term that many have used before,***I didn't degrade them*** as such and its good that Strongee has apologised it means he is man enough to understand he said the wrong thing...I will also apologise if I offended anyone using my terminology...
If there is a big difference and you think you didnt degrade anyone, why are you apologising?
Tiger5150,I said IF I OFFENDED anyone I apologise,it wasnt meant to,but I think if you think Im that big of an offensive guy,leave it at that you seem to have made your point and made a big deal out of it....I think there is a big difference using computer terminology and the term morons....but Strongee has done the right thing and so have I...
@Newtown said in [Brooks\.\.\.\. what is he good for??](/post/1179241) said:Maybe Brooks should have played on the wing tonight instead of Hoffman.With Reynolds/Benji the centre pairing itis a good chance it would have been succesfull.
@Hangonaminute said in [Brooks\.\.\.\. what is he good for??](/post/1179299) said:Just one of his usual games where he decides to start playing with 15 min to go and the game is all over.
When is his contract up?
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Brooks\.\.\.\. what is he good for??](/post/1179198) said:@cktiger said in [Brooks\.\.\.\. what is he good for??](/post/1179178) said:Brooks in hiding again tonight ... especially in the defensive line . Throw in poor missed tackles from “Mr Defence” that directly cost tries.
Only good thing was the falcon to get us the ball back.
Go t😵PSM that was Mbye four. times.
@Jedi_Tiger said in [Brooks\.\.\.\. what is he good for??](/post/1179317) said:Benji at 7
Say to brooks you are 6 just run the ball dont think dont set up plays just chime in and run
@Moh said in [Brooks\.\.\.\. what is he good for??](/post/1179310) said:Brooks fan, but a change is needed.
Name Benji at 7, and name Brooks at 6. Technically that's how they play, but it might put him on notice a bit, and if that doesn't work it's time to give him a short stint on the sidelines.
@avocadoontoast said in [Brooks\.\.\.\. what is he good for??](/post/1179321) said:@Jedi_Tiger said in [Brooks\.\.\.\. what is he good for??](/post/1179317) said:Benji at 7
Say to brooks you are 6 just run the ball dont think dont set up plays just chime in and run
No matter what number he has on his back he’ll play the same. It’s just who he is. No killer instinct.
@happy_tiger said in [Brooks\.\.\.\. what is he good for??](/post/1179203) said:@Tigerbuck63 said in [Brooks\.\.\.\. what is he good for??](/post/1179192) said:@jadtiger said in [Brooks\.\.\.\. what is he good for??](/post/1175270) said:Brooks played well his defence was solid all night.Some people just like to criticise him and Nof because they can
why don't you forum members that continue to knock Brooks go and support another team. He was not the reason we lost the game our forwards could not go forward and as per some forum members have alluded to we should be paying 2 props for go forward, I blame Madge for this loss not selecting a forward pack that could not make yards, shows however we are still a thereabouts team.
What positives can you give me about Brooks game that relate to being a good half from tonight
@Sco77y said in [Brooks\.\.\.\. what is he good for??](/post/1179373) said:We have a list of deadwood so long you could build a dam with it, no captain, and years of failure across every position on the field, but let's write 4 pages about how bad Brooks is after a loss..
@Tigerbuck63 said in [Brooks\.\.\.\. what is he good for??](/post/1179374) said:@happy_tiger said in [Brooks\.\.\.\. what is he good for??](/post/1179203) said:@Tigerbuck63 said in [Brooks\.\.\.\. what is he good for??](/post/1179192) said:@jadtiger said in [Brooks\.\.\.\. what is he good for??](/post/1175270) said:Brooks played well his defence was solid all night.Some people just like to criticise him and Nof because they can
why don't you forum members that continue to knock Brooks go and support another team. He was not the reason we lost the game our forwards could not go forward and as per some forum members have alluded to we should be paying 2 props for go forward, I blame Madge for this loss not selecting a forward pack that could not make yards, shows however we are still a thereabouts team.
What positives can you give me about Brooks game that relate to being a good half from tonight
Well i cant give you any positives as the forwards did not make it past the advantage line, nor did the the wingers or fullback have much impact.
i cant say i saw Mybe taking a run but i did see brooks defending well all night,
sorry but your a nuffie and would love to run at you and see if you could tackle,