Bulldogs Kicked a Field Goal On Tackle 7

It was 7\. Was that after Brooks shot? I counted 7 and assumed we must have touched it something, impossible as that was
 
it was 7\. Was that after Brooks shot? I counted 7 and assumed we must have touched it or something, impossible as that was
 
@BlackandGoldForever said:
@willow said:
They didn't change the result for the Cowboys the other year.

completely different situation it happened in the 1st half and it cant be 100% that it costed them the game
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

Still don't think it will change the result, as much as we did deserve 1 point.
 
Was this the set that was kicked from a tiger to another tigers back? If so it's a 7 tackle set, whereby the dogs start from 0\. IF that was the set. I can't recall properly though.
 
@tsjonathan said:
Was this the set that was kicked from a tiger to another tigers back? If so it's a 7 tackle set, whereby the dogs start from 0\. IF that was the set. I can't recall properly though.
Click to expand...

It would be accidental offside would it not, thus should have been a scrum?
 
They claimed it was for accidental offside but the rule back states in that case it should be a scrum or if there is an advantage then it's just play on. It should never be a 7 tackle set. That's coming from
Bill Harrogan.

_Posted using RoarFEED 4.2.0_
 
Actually Bill came back and said he was mistaken and the NRL and refs confirmed it was the right call.

Now the bullshit knock on and the crap no-try and the moses late hit - those were refs mistakes
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Members online

Total: 1,163 (members: 11, guests: 1,152)
Back
Top