TSP
Well-known member
Yes.I respectfully disagree TY, because whilst the functions of coaching are the same across all teams, the nuances are not.
And that’s where your Bellamy’s, Bennetts, Robinsons and Clearys excel.
They look at the issues and see alternative solutions. There understanding of players is deep and they quite often see things that others do not.
It may only be a tweak here or there but they would make a difference.
Sure, they need good cattle as well, but whilst putting that together they can adjust the major floors to see an instant difference.
This was something that Ciraldo couldn’t do initially at the Dogs, coz I don’t think he knew how. Now he’s got better players it’s slowly coming together. As it would for Benji.
But my point is that if one of the Big4 had gone in, they would have had a faster and greater impact on the exisiting players. That’s the difference imo.
Perhaps the most outstanding example of coaching nuance this year has been Flanno and his placement of Zac Lomax on the wing.
From factory player to marquee, origin hero, potential finalist in a stock squad, -probable Kangaroo in the space of six months.
Left to his own devices, Zac would be making up the numbers in the centres or warming the bench. I think he even got dropped last year.
Flanno knew what to do with him.