Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
@jadtiger said:@happy tiger said:McQueen's 29 , didn't realize he was that old …...
He was at souths for a long time.A 3 year contract from next year would mean we would have him till he was 33.I would have hoped as a club we would have learned our lesson about signing "veteran" players but we are WT and notoriously slow learners.
@Tigerdon said:If it for 2018\. No. I don't think we need to jump at him. Get the big4 and others signed ahead of him.
If it's for 2017, then yes if we can sign him with whatever was left of Simona's money and still staying under the cap. We need a good edge defender.
@clontarfkid said:We need "experienced"forwards???….we already have a current SOO prop,a former SOO prop(Grant),and ex Internationals in both the 2nd row and lock.
Yep,weve got a whole bunch of promising kids coming thru in the forwards,but surely we already have enough experience there to guide them.
We desperately need centres and wingers,and with $$ scarce next year after the big 4 have been renegotiated,thats where we shld be investing our scarce $$.
Re McQueen himself..Souths offloaded him for a reason..a fringe SOO player at best who always looked a little short of the SOO standard IMO,and not getting any younger.
A ridiculous signing shld it proceed
@clontarfkid said:We need "experienced"forwards???….we already have a current SOO prop,a former SOO prop(Grant),and ex Internationals in both the 2nd row and lock.
Yep,weve got a whole bunch of promising kids coming thru in the forwards,but surely we already have enough experience there to guide them.
We desperately need centres and wingers,and with $$ scarce next year after the big 4 have been renegotiated,thats where we shld be investing our scarce $$.
Re McQueen himself..Souths offloaded him for a reason..a fringe SOO player at best who always looked a little short of the SOO standard IMO,and not getting any younger.
A ridiculous signing shld it proceed
@GNR4LIFE said:@jadtiger said:@happy tiger said:McQueen's 29 , didn't realize he was that old …...
He was at souths for a long time.A 3 year contract from next year would mean we would have him till he was 33.I would have hoped as a club we would have learned our lesson about signing "veteran" players but we are WT and notoriously slow learners.
He won't be 33 till the very back end of his final season, literally the last month. I don't see a 3 year contract for him an issue whatsoever.
@Sabre said:@innsaneink said:@gallagher said:@Nucky Thompson said:The guys a gun don't understand why people say they don't rate him.
Yup. So far better than our guys is not funny. I'm liking us going for established players.
Ballin, ET, Idris, McQueen*… Origin players... Internationals... Finals and GF experienced.... I'm liking what we're building if it all comes together
We'd be looking good if it was 2010
@Nucky Thompson said:@clontarfkid said:We need "experienced"forwards???….we already have a current SOO prop,a former SOO prop(Grant),and ex Internationals in both the 2nd row and lock.
Yep,weve got a whole bunch of promising kids coming thru in the forwards,but surely we already have enough experience there to guide them.
We desperately need centres and wingers,and with $$ scarce next year after the big 4 have been renegotiated,thats where we shld be investing our scarce $$.
Re McQueen himself..Souths offloaded him for a reason..a fringe SOO player at best who always looked a little short of the SOO standard IMO,and not getting any younger.
A ridiculous signing shld it proceed
You contradict yourself
Re McQueen himself..Souths offloaded him for a reason
You mention we have grant as experience and souths offload him too
@Nucky Thompson said:The guys a gun don't understand why people say they don't rate him.
@jadtiger said:@GNR4LIFE said:@jadtiger said:@happy tiger said:McQueen's 29 , didn't realize he was that old …...
He was at souths for a long time.A 3 year contract from next year would mean we would have him till he was 33.I would have hoped as a club we would have learned our lesson about signing "veteran" players but we are WT and notoriously slow learners.
He won't be 33 till the very back end of his final season, literally the last month. I don't see a 3 year contract for him an issue whatsoever.
If it was a 1 year contract with an option in our favour at a reasonable price i would have little problem with him.However a 3 year deal for a man who will be 30 when we get him i do see problems.It will take him longer to get over niggling injuries let alone a major one.League is a collision sport and as you get older wear and tear tends to accumulate on all players.
If he was 25 i would be prepared for a 3 year contract but not at 30