It all comes down to what fans deem.as a fair win. The best team lost. and the referees decisions played some part in that. Dont have a problem with the eight point try or even the last penalty - it was the two penalties before that (both dubious) to Souths, that got them back into the game, and the penalty that should have been awarded to The Bulldogs when Morris was taken out, that are hard to swallow. But now because the fans blew up, disgracefully, the refs will escape criticism again. I suspect that there would have been an adverse reaction by an element of any supporter base. due to the refereeing in that match.
yer off yer head…and what you DO have a problem with occurs in every game....yet we dont see what youre condoning at the end of every game
Whoa - never said I condoned what happened - said it was disgraceful - but while ever referees are not permitted to justify/explain decisions that are made on the field (especially in controversial games) that the fans dont understand they will be continually targeted. Allow them to explain the rulings - they are just as important to the success and failure of this game as the coaches and the players are. Given the opportunity they may actually prove that nine times out of ten, they made the right decision and in doing so dispel the notion by many that they are incompetent.
The way Im reading it is youre justifying the actions of the Dogs members violence by blaming the refs performance and the fact they dont have to explain their decisions.
Even if what you propose was in place, and refs could explain at a presser or similar…I doubt that wouldve calmed the rabid mob last night.
Anyway, its been confirmed the decision that incited it all was correct, yes theyre not perfect and tough calls happen in games....it happens to everyone and isnt confined to sport, its a fact of life too