GNR4LIFE
Well-known member
I just hope any games that are called off are postponed and not cancelled altogether. GF in November/December anybody?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@Jay said in [Corona impact on NRL\.\.\.?](/post/1128518) said:NRL without audience cheering is boring so I hope they would add in artificial cheering sound effects to TV if so lol. Seriously it's not as exciting. If they do cancel NRL for one week, they might as well cancel the season. Because it's not going away in one week or one month. Maybe 6 months one year.
@Elderslie_Tiger said in [Corona impact on NRL\.\.\.?](/post/1128445) said:CRICKET AUSTRALIA have announced that today's AUST v NZ will be played behind closed doors.
OVER REACTION ???????
@WT2K said in [Corona impact on NRL\.\.\.?](/post/1128525) said:BREAKING: Government has given advice to ban gatherings of more than 500 people. Story from @CUhlmann @NRLonNine @9NewsSyd
@TSupps05 said in [Corona impact on NRL\.\.\.?](/post/1128526) said:The problem with postponing the season is that the virus will be getting worse in time due to amount of people with it. IF we are cancelling games with only 100 odd people in AUS with it right now we won't see a season
@hammertime said in [Corona impact on NRL\.\.\.?](/post/1128529) said:@WT2K said in [Corona impact on NRL\.\.\.?](/post/1128525) said:BREAKING: Government has given advice to ban gatherings of more than 500 people. Story from @CUhlmann @NRLonNine @9NewsSyd
Umm.... Like a school or workplace?
@hammertime said in [Corona impact on NRL\.\.\.?](/post/1128529) said:@WT2K said in [Corona impact on NRL\.\.\.?](/post/1128525) said:BREAKING: Government has given advice to ban gatherings of more than 500 people. Story from @CUhlmann @NRLonNine @9NewsSyd
Umm.... Like a school or workplace?
@jirskyr said in [Corona impact on NRL\.\.\.?](/post/1128537) said:@hammertime said in [Corona impact on NRL\.\.\.?](/post/1128529) said:@WT2K said in [Corona impact on NRL\.\.\.?](/post/1128525) said:BREAKING: Government has given advice to ban gatherings of more than 500 people. Story from @CUhlmann @NRLonNine @9NewsSyd
Umm.... Like a school or workplace?
It's fairly ridiculous. I understand trying to stop spread, but that should be down to the individual self-isolating and not forcing things to close down.
For example, if they were to cancel a football match, you are talking around 20K people within approx 0.5 square kilometre of each other. Individually you'd come into close contact with perhaps a few hundred people as you walk into and out of the ground, get a beer, use the toilet. I can't cough onto the young family in the boxes or behind the tryline. So they would cancel this.
But you are free to catch a train right now into town at peak hour, when you would be automatically sharing a enclosed cabin with about 50-100 people, on a platform with 1000 people, touching railings of several thousands of people have already touched it that day, going to a place where 10s of thousands of people are working and milling about.
Tonight alone tens of thousands of people will probably be out and about, drinking and eating, getting less and less careful with their bodily selves as the beers pile up.
But of course you need to think about banning football? Don't get it.
@jirskyr said in [Corona impact on NRL\.\.\.?](/post/1128537) said:@hammertime said in [Corona impact on NRL\.\.\.?](/post/1128529) said:@WT2K said in [Corona impact on NRL\.\.\.?](/post/1128525) said:BREAKING: Government has given advice to ban gatherings of more than 500 people. Story from @CUhlmann @NRLonNine @9NewsSyd
Umm.... Like a school or workplace?
It's fairly ridiculous. I understand trying to stop spread, but that should be down to the individual self-isolating and not forcing things to close down.
For example, if they were to cancel a football match, you are talking around 20K people within approx 0.5 square kilometre of each other. Individually you'd come into close contact with perhaps a few hundred people as you walk into and out of the ground, get a beer, use the toilet. I can't cough onto the young family in the boxes or behind the tryline. So they would cancel this.
But you are free to catch a train right now into town at peak hour, when you would be automatically sharing a enclosed cabin with about 50-100 people, on a platform with 1000 people, touching railings of several thousands of people have already touched it that day, going to a place where 10s of thousands of people are working and milling about.
Tonight alone tens of thousands of people will probably be out and about, drinking and eating, getting less and less careful with their bodily selves as the beers pile up.
But of course you need to think about banning football? Don't get it.
@rustycage said in [Corona impact on NRL\.\.\.?](/post/1128548) said:@jirskyr said in [Corona impact on NRL\.\.\.?](/post/1128537) said:@hammertime said in [Corona impact on NRL\.\.\.?](/post/1128529) said:@WT2K said in [Corona impact on NRL\.\.\.?](/post/1128525) said:BREAKING: Government has given advice to ban gatherings of more than 500 people. Story from @CUhlmann @NRLonNine @9NewsSyd
Umm.... Like a school or workplace?
It's fairly ridiculous. I understand trying to stop spread, but that should be down to the individual self-isolating and not forcing things to close down.
For example, if they were to cancel a football match, you are talking around 20K people within approx 0.5 square kilometre of each other. Individually you'd come into close contact with perhaps a few hundred people as you walk into and out of the ground, get a beer, use the toilet. I can't cough onto the young family in the boxes or behind the tryline. So they would cancel this.
But you are free to catch a train right now into town at peak hour, when you would be automatically sharing a enclosed cabin with about 50-100 people, on a platform with 1000 people, touching railings of several thousands of people have already touched it that day, going to a place where 10s of thousands of people are working and milling about.
Tonight alone tens of thousands of people will probably be out and about, drinking and eating, getting less and less careful with their bodily selves as the beers pile up.
But of course you need to think about banning football? Don't get it.
You're a clever guy. You should get it. My take is this. The population will predominantly be guided by their peers. As more and more are educated, more and more will follow. I notice the whole argument of it being a media driven mass hysteria have diminished somewhat. My understanding is that as we as a whole remain apart more, the infection rate will decrease but remain for a longer period which is better than a mass disease contraction. I'm not here trying to preach to you as I've read your line of work, but your above response surprises me. Maybe I'm completely off the mark here, but just my understanding from what I've been absorbing of late. This thing isn't a joke and I think people are getting used to that idea. I reckon the season will be knocked on the head pretty early on. Maybe we'll be back on for Origin if we're lucky so the Blues can smash those toads again.
@diedpretty said in [Corona impact on NRL\.\.\.?](/post/1128429) said:@Demps said in [Corona impact on NRL\.\.\.?](/post/1128012) said:@bigsiro said in [Corona impact on NRL\.\.\.?](/post/1128010) said:When will the NRL:
1) play in empty stadiums
2) suspend the season
??
COVID19 thread over there ---->
Cancel the season.
I've seen enough.
Not yet otherwise the slime are premiers.
@JD-Tiger said in [Corona impact on NRL\.\.\.?](/post/1128546) said:Skyfire in Canberra is cancelled (edit: postponed sorry), and a personality on the radio station promoting it has now said that the Raiders Titans game tonight will be closed to spectators. Nothing official yet, but for a 6 o'clock kickoff, I'm expecting it at any second.
@jirskyr said in [Corona impact on NRL\.\.\.?](/post/1128537) said:It's fairly ridiculous. I understand trying to stop spread, but that should be down to the individual self-isolating and not forcing things to close down.
@Tigerboy said in [Corona impact on NRL\.\.\.?](/post/1128549) said:@rustycage said in [Corona impact on NRL\.\.\.?](/post/1128548) said:@jirskyr said in [Corona impact on NRL\.\.\.?](/post/1128537) said:@hammertime said in [Corona impact on NRL\.\.\.?](/post/1128529) said:@WT2K said in [Corona impact on NRL\.\.\.?](/post/1128525) said:BREAKING: Government has given advice to ban gatherings of more than 500 people. Story from @CUhlmann @NRLonNine @9NewsSyd
Umm.... Like a school or workplace?
It's fairly ridiculous. I understand trying to stop spread, but that should be down to the individual self-isolating and not forcing things to close down.
For example, if they were to cancel a football match, you are talking around 20K people within approx 0.5 square kilometre of each other. Individually you'd come into close contact with perhaps a few hundred people as you walk into and out of the ground, get a beer, use the toilet. I can't cough onto the young family in the boxes or behind the tryline. So they would cancel this.
But you are free to catch a train right now into town at peak hour, when you would be automatically sharing a enclosed cabin with about 50-100 people, on a platform with 1000 people, touching railings of several thousands of people have already touched it that day, going to a place where 10s of thousands of people are working and milling about.
Tonight alone tens of thousands of people will probably be out and about, drinking and eating, getting less and less careful with their bodily selves as the beers pile up.
But of course you need to think about banning football? Don't get it.
You're a clever guy. You should get it. My take is this. The population will predominantly be guided by their peers. As more and more are educated, more and more will follow. I notice the whole argument of it being a media driven mass hysteria have diminished somewhat. My understanding is that as we as a whole remain apart more, the infection rate will decrease but remain for a longer period which is better than a mass disease contraction. I'm not here trying to preach to you as I've read your line of work, but your above response surprises me. Maybe I'm completely off the mark here, but just my understanding from what I've been absorbing of late. This thing isn't a joke and I think people are getting used to that idea. I reckon the season will be knocked on the head pretty early on. Maybe we'll be back on for Origin if we're lucky so the Blues can smash those toads again.
Right, so he’s wrong but at the same time you’re advocating for the season ‘knocked’ on its head