pawsandclaws1
Well-known member
Has LA been red zoned by Dan Andrews? Make sure those traffic signals are working.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@cochise said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1292894) said:@Regan said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1292887) said:@Curly_Tiger said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1292884) said:@cochise said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1292879) said:@Regan said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1292875) said:@cochise said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1292870) said:@Regan said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1292867) said:@Curly_Tiger said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1292721) said:I would recommend watching this, he makes some very interesting points. I would be interested in the balanced views of the group
https://rumble.com/vcesav-brave-reporter-goes-off-script-on-air.html
Thank you great video everyone should watch
A friend of mine works in a lab in Sydney says most of the people there feel the same as what this doctor says and she's told she's not allowed to wear a mask because it increases infections only gloves and a lab coat
It's amazing how many sheep there are in this world go home watch tv and the control starts out as fear then escalation into wearing mask
So what are the people who are trying to control us trying to achieve by making us wear a mask?
Ignorance is bliss i guess for most but some times you just have to stop and think
So you don't want to answer the question?
It’s all available if you look for it, you’d be amazed what you might find
Curly Tiger people are just to lazy , can not take emotion out of it and just look at the facts or worst yet don't want responsibility
I genuinely asked you a question and you refused to answer, I have not at any point questioned what you said.
@Curly_Tiger said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1292931) said:@Nelson said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1292920) said:@Curly_Tiger said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1292853) said:@mike said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1292847) said:@Nelson said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1292843) said:@Curly_Tiger said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1292817) said:It isn’t crazy to question all this and I'd encourage everyone to do so and don't believe everything your television tells you, even if it's not from some "backward country" whatever that means
...
Conspiracy theorist was a term which originated from the CIA to classify those who disputed the findings of the Warren Commission into JFK's assassination
You question “all this” but seemingly accept without question whatever dodgy internet site told you that the CIA originated the term “conspiracy theorist “?
Pretty funny isn’t it.
About as funny as believing it's been debunked by incredulous sites like Snopes. Look into them when you have a minute
Perhaps it arose earlier not through them but they certainly "weaponised it". "False flags" are a real thing, check them out, Gulf of Tonkin incident which ramped up US involvement in Vietnam is a less controversial one than 911
Here's one bit of discussion on the matter. I get we won't convince each other by putting up one source against another. You'll claim mine are loopy and I'll claim yours are owned or behlden to a system. Either way, there are different points of view
https://ampoli.com/the-origins-of-the-term-conspiracy-theory/
I'm not here to convince you just to challenge what is being accepted, call me a contrarian if you like but it is a healthy thing to being open to alternate opinions. I respect your right to yours even if I don't agree. I may try to convince you otherwise but I won't call you an idiot or get personal
What you posted is someone whose “research” is based on the writings of like-minded individuals. He made no effort to question any of the propositions made by others because it suited his premise to accept them as right. Any credible researcher would look for material that might contradict their assertion like, maybe, the Oxford dictionary which cites usage at least as early as 1907. Have they been inveigled into the web of the CIA too?
You literally did just accept as correct a dodgy internet site...
Oxford hey, must be right then
Home of the Round Table Group which in many ways grows a branch which becomes the CIA
The origins of conspiracy theorists is a very minor part of my discussion, let’s not dwell on it. It was in response to disrespectful name calling
@Regan said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1293194) said:@Curly_Tiger said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1292931) said:@Nelson said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1292920) said:@Curly_Tiger said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1292853) said:@mike said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1292847) said:@Nelson said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1292843) said:@Curly_Tiger said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1292817) said:It isn’t crazy to question all this and I'd encourage everyone to do so and don't believe everything your television tells you, even if it's not from some "backward country" whatever that means
...
Conspiracy theorist was a term which originated from the CIA to classify those who disputed the findings of the Warren Commission into JFK's assassination
You question “all this” but seemingly accept without question whatever dodgy internet site told you that the CIA originated the term “conspiracy theorist “?
Pretty funny isn’t it.
About as funny as believing it's been debunked by incredulous sites like Snopes. Look into them when you have a minute
Perhaps it arose earlier not through them but they certainly "weaponised it". "False flags" are a real thing, check them out, Gulf of Tonkin incident which ramped up US involvement in Vietnam is a less controversial one than 911
Here's one bit of discussion on the matter. I get we won't convince each other by putting up one source against another. You'll claim mine are loopy and I'll claim yours are owned or behlden to a system. Either way, there are different points of view
https://ampoli.com/the-origins-of-the-term-conspiracy-theory/
I'm not here to convince you just to challenge what is being accepted, call me a contrarian if you like but it is a healthy thing to being open to alternate opinions. I respect your right to yours even if I don't agree. I may try to convince you otherwise but I won't call you an idiot or get personal
What you posted is someone whose “research” is based on the writings of like-minded individuals. He made no effort to question any of the propositions made by others because it suited his premise to accept them as right. Any credible researcher would look for material that might contradict their assertion like, maybe, the Oxford dictionary which cites usage at least as early as 1907. Have they been inveigled into the web of the CIA too?
You literally did just accept as correct a dodgy internet site...
Oxford hey, must be right then
Home of the Round Table Group which in many ways grows a branch which becomes the CIA
The origins of conspiracy theorists is a very minor part of my discussion, let’s not dwell on it. It was in response to disrespectful name calling
Curly have a read
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?113667-Recent-Pfizer-Covid19-vaccine-data-an-applied-failure
@innsaneink said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1293258) said:Why were kids not included before Christmas in household restriction numbers yet now they are?
@innsaneink said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1293258) said:Why were kids not included before Christmas in household restriction numbers yet now they are?
@formerguest said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1293297) said:@innsaneink said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1293258) said:Why were kids not included before Christmas in household restriction numbers yet now they are?
Obviously not based on science.
@Curly_Tiger said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1293314) said:@formerguest said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1293297) said:@innsaneink said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1293258) said:Why were kids not included before Christmas in household restriction numbers yet now they are?
Obviously not based on science.
Science has been debunked ?
@cochise said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1292894) said:@Regan said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1292887) said:@Curly_Tiger said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1292884) said:@cochise said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1292879) said:@Regan said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1292875) said:@cochise said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1292870) said:@Regan said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1292867) said:@Curly_Tiger said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1292721) said:I would recommend watching this, he makes some very interesting points. I would be interested in the balanced views of the group
https://rumble.com/vcesav-brave-reporter-goes-off-script-on-air.html
Thank you great video everyone should watch
A friend of mine works in a lab in Sydney says most of the people there feel the same as what this doctor says and she's told she's not allowed to wear a mask because it increases infections only gloves and a lab coat
It's amazing how many sheep there are in this world go home watch tv and the control starts out as fear then escalation into wearing mask
So what are the people who are trying to control us trying to achieve by making us wear a mask?
Ignorance is bliss i guess for most but some times you just have to stop and think
So you don't want to answer the question?
It’s all available if you look for it, you’d be amazed what you might find
Curly Tiger people are just to lazy , can not take emotion out of it and just look at the facts or worst yet don't want responsibility
I genuinely asked you a question and you refused to answer, I have not at any point questioned what you said.
@Regan said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1293360) said:@cochise said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1292894) said:@Regan said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1292887) said:@Curly_Tiger said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1292884) said:@cochise said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1292879) said:@Regan said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1292875) said:@cochise said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1292870) said:@Regan said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1292867) said:@Curly_Tiger said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1292721) said:I would recommend watching this, he makes some very interesting points. I would be interested in the balanced views of the group
https://rumble.com/vcesav-brave-reporter-goes-off-script-on-air.html
Thank you great video everyone should watch
A friend of mine works in a lab in Sydney says most of the people there feel the same as what this doctor says and she's told she's not allowed to wear a mask because it increases infections only gloves and a lab coat
It's amazing how many sheep there are in this world go home watch tv and the control starts out as fear then escalation into wearing mask
So what are the people who are trying to control us trying to achieve by making us wear a mask?
Ignorance is bliss i guess for most but some times you just have to stop and think
So you don't want to answer the question?
It’s all available if you look for it, you’d be amazed what you might find
Curly Tiger people are just to lazy , can not take emotion out of it and just look at the facts or worst yet don't want responsibility
I genuinely asked you a question and you refused to answer, I have not at any point questioned what you said.
https://2020news.de/en/dr-wodarg-and-dr-yeadon-request-a-stop-of-all-corona-vaccination-studies-and-call-for-co-signing-the-petition/
Have a read
@cochise said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1293362) said:@Regan said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1293360) said:@cochise said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1292894) said:@Regan said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1292887) said:@Curly_Tiger said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1292884) said:@cochise said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1292879) said:@Regan said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1292875) said:@cochise said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1292870) said:@Regan said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1292867) said:@Curly_Tiger said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1292721) said:I would recommend watching this, he makes some very interesting points. I would be interested in the balanced views of the group
https://rumble.com/vcesav-brave-reporter-goes-off-script-on-air.html
Thank you great video everyone should watch
A friend of mine works in a lab in Sydney says most of the people there feel the same as what this doctor says and she's told she's not allowed to wear a mask because it increases infections only gloves and a lab coat
It's amazing how many sheep there are in this world go home watch tv and the control starts out as fear then escalation into wearing mask
So what are the people who are trying to control us trying to achieve by making us wear a mask?
Ignorance is bliss i guess for most but some times you just have to stop and think
So you don't want to answer the question?
It’s all available if you look for it, you’d be amazed what you might find
Curly Tiger people are just to lazy , can not take emotion out of it and just look at the facts or worst yet don't want responsibility
I genuinely asked you a question and you refused to answer, I have not at any point questioned what you said.
https://2020news.de/en/dr-wodarg-and-dr-yeadon-request-a-stop-of-all-corona-vaccination-studies-and-call-for-co-signing-the-petition/
Have a read
I did
@Regan said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1293358) said:That's good to know you mite not be able to have babies that's what Bill Gates said in his ted talk in 2016 that he could control the worlds population thru vaccines
At least all the sheep will be gone
@Curly_Tiger said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1293365) said:@Regan said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1293358) said:That's good to know you mite not be able to have babies that's what Bill Gates said in his ted talk in 2016 that he could control the worlds population thru vaccines
At least all the sheep will be gone
Funny how those who call for reducing the world’s population are the same ones pushing vaxxines
There’s no such thing as a coincidence
@Curly_Tiger said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1293286) said:@Regan said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1293194) said:@Curly_Tiger said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1292931) said:@Nelson said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1292920) said:@Curly_Tiger said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1292853) said:@mike said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1292847) said:@Nelson said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1292843) said:@Curly_Tiger said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1292817) said:It isn’t crazy to question all this and I'd encourage everyone to do so and don't believe everything your television tells you, even if it's not from some "backward country" whatever that means
...
Conspiracy theorist was a term which originated from the CIA to classify those who disputed the findings of the Warren Commission into JFK's assassination
You question “all this” but seemingly accept without question whatever dodgy internet site told you that the CIA originated the term “conspiracy theorist “?
Pretty funny isn’t it.
About as funny as believing it's been debunked by incredulous sites like Snopes. Look into them when you have a minute
Perhaps it arose earlier not through them but they certainly "weaponised it". "False flags" are a real thing, check them out, Gulf of Tonkin incident which ramped up US involvement in Vietnam is a less controversial one than 911
Here's one bit of discussion on the matter. I get we won't convince each other by putting up one source against another. You'll claim mine are loopy and I'll claim yours are owned or behlden to a system. Either way, there are different points of view
https://ampoli.com/the-origins-of-the-term-conspiracy-theory/
I'm not here to convince you just to challenge what is being accepted, call me a contrarian if you like but it is a healthy thing to being open to alternate opinions. I respect your right to yours even if I don't agree. I may try to convince you otherwise but I won't call you an idiot or get personal
What you posted is someone whose “research” is based on the writings of like-minded individuals. He made no effort to question any of the propositions made by others because it suited his premise to accept them as right. Any credible researcher would look for material that might contradict their assertion like, maybe, the Oxford dictionary which cites usage at least as early as 1907. Have they been inveigled into the web of the CIA too?
You literally did just accept as correct a dodgy internet site...
Oxford hey, must be right then
Home of the Round Table Group which in many ways grows a branch which becomes the CIA
The origins of conspiracy theorists is a very minor part of my discussion, let’s not dwell on it. It was in response to disrespectful name calling
Curly have a read
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?113667-Recent-Pfizer-Covid19-vaccine-data-an-applied-failure
Thanks Regan, pretty alarming for sure but Pfizer have been a disgraceful company over the years, so many scandals that are downright criminal and which show no regard for humanity
I wouldn’t take an aspirin off them let alone a vaxxine
https://www.corp-research.org/pfizer