Cricket Season Thread

[hobbo1]

England !
World Cup champions...🏆
“Well done lads “

 

[happy_tiger]

In typical English fashion a New Zealander beat his own countrymen by cheating , with a great bowling performance from a West Indian captained by an Irishman

 

[hobbo1]

In typical English fashion a New Zealander beat his own countrymen by cheating , with a great bowling performance from a West Indian captained by an Irishman

Eat arse loser !

 

[Tbone]

Amazing game. Watched it with my English mate. Poor bloke was a nervous wreck.

 

[happy_tiger]

In all seriousness though , one rule the ICC should change asap is a ball striking batsmen running between the wickets , in the future the ball needs to be classed as dead

 

[GNR4LIFE]

It came home!!!

 

[Geo]

Congrats to the World XI...

 

[hobbo1]

Congrats to the World XI...

Haha ....
Who doesn’t want to be a Pom ...
Even Warner’s latest daughter can play for England !

All won fair and square..
Bowl the next one underarm matey !
....oh and don’t forget the sandpaper next month !

 

[GNR4LIFE]

Think they'll make it a double with the Ashes.

 

[maxxn99]

In typical English fashion a New Zealander beat his own countrymen by cheating , with a great bowling performance from a West Indian captained by an Irishman

Hahahahaha that’s really funny that !!!!!

 

[maxxn99]

In all seriousness though , one rule the ICC should change asap is a ball striking batsmen running between the wickets , in the future the ball needs to be classed as dead

I seriously thought it should have been dead.

 

[TheDaBoss]

aw damn

would of loved for NZ to win GG

 

[Cultured_Bogan]

Great to watch the Irish win the World Cup without even having a team qualify.

 

[tig_prmz]

In all seriousness though , one rule the ICC should change asap is a ball striking batsmen running between the wickets , in the future the ball needs to be classed as dead

i've been scratching my head about this.
i swear about 5 years ago, a rule came out that if the ball deflects off a batsman from an overthrow you can't take any runs from it to encourage fielders to throw more. i've been googling this for a while and can't find anything anywhere but i distinctly remember this rule came out!

 

[GNR4LIFE]

In all seriousness though , one rule the ICC should change asap is a ball striking batsmen running between the wickets , in the future the ball needs to be classed as dead

i've been scratching my head about this.
i swear about 5 years ago, a rule came out that if the ball deflects off a batsman from an overthrow you can't take any runs from it to encourage fielders to throw more. i've been googling this for a while and can't find anything anywhere but i distinctly remember this rule came out!

Its etiquette. Batsmen won't run if the ball deflects off them. However, if the deflection goes for four, there's nothing that can be done.

 

[happy_tiger]

In all seriousness though , one rule the ICC should change asap is a ball striking batsmen running between the wickets , in the future the ball needs to be classed as dead

i've been scratching my head about this.
i swear about 5 years ago, a rule came out that if the ball deflects off a batsman from an overthrow you can't take any runs from it to encourage fielders to throw more. i've been googling this for a while and can't find anything anywhere but i distinctly remember this rule came out!

Its etiquette. Batsmen won't run if the ball deflects off them. However, if the deflection goes for four, there's nothing that can be done.

Its very clear he did it on purpose , you can't trust Rangas

Should of been given out for obstruction

 

[hobbo1]

In all seriousness though , one rule the ICC should change asap is a ball striking batsmen running between the wickets , in the future the ball needs to be classed as dead

i've been scratching my head about this.
i swear about 5 years ago, a rule came out that if the ball deflects off a batsman from an overthrow you can't take any runs from it to encourage fielders to throw more. i've been googling this for a while and can't find anything anywhere but i distinctly remember this rule came out!

Its etiquette. Batsmen won't run if the ball deflects off them. However, if the deflection goes for four, there's nothing that can be done.

Its very clear he did it on purpose , you can't trust Rangas

Should of been given out for obstruction

Not even funny
Stop being a sook !

 

[TheDaBoss]

Who r we up against next?

 

[GNR4LIFE]

In all seriousness though , one rule the ICC should change asap is a ball striking batsmen running between the wickets , in the future the ball needs to be classed as dead

i've been scratching my head about this.
i swear about 5 years ago, a rule came out that if the ball deflects off a batsman from an overthrow you can't take any runs from it to encourage fielders to throw more. i've been googling this for a while and can't find anything anywhere but i distinctly remember this rule came out!

Its etiquette. Batsmen won't run if the ball deflects off them. However, if the deflection goes for four, there's nothing that can be done.

Its very clear he did it on purpose , you can't trust Rangas

Should of been given out for obstruction

Not sure if serious...

 

[supercoach]

Kiwis did not have much luck and were stiff they are not holding the silverware now, but when your batsman ducks under the last ball of your 50 overs without at least having a swipe you have to wonder was it bad luck.

One thing you have to admire is the way they handled the defeat...real sportsman