Cricket Season Thread

Hauritz didn't have a good game but he shouldn't lose his spot to Doherty. At the very least, Hauritz gets 1st crack. Doherty has been mediocre for years, gets 4 wickets in an ODI and gets talked up as the front-line Ashes spinner. Ridiculous.

Hussey hits from with his hundred means he will retain his place. North if he fails may lose his spot. Steve Smith and Cam White are the 2 blokes looking at the 6 spot. Batsman who can bowl if needed, though North is the stronger bowler.

Bollinger should be one of the 3 quicks. Siddle is favoured though.

I would have:

1\. Watson 2\. Katich 3\. Ponting 4\. Clarke 5\. Hussey 6\. Smith 7\. Haddin 8\. Johnson 9\. Hauritz 10\. Hilfenhaus 11\. Bollinger

However that won't be the team.
 
Well looks like its the X-man Doherty for the team. Hauritz dropped from the squad. Not sure it really matter, the selectors move from one mediocre bowler to the next. They could have stuck with one bloke and got similar results.

Khawaja was out first ball which happens some times. He didn't have a great game in Hobart but his general form has been good this year. I think he's a better choice than Ferguson but let's face it Hussey and North look odds on to keep their places.
 
Katich
Watson
Ponting ©
Clarke (vc)
Hussey
Haddin
Smith/ North (Prolly Smith but I haven't seen much of North)
Johnson
Doherty (I prefer him over Hauritz TBH)
Hilfy
Bollinger
 
From the 13 chosen for the first test squad I'd leave out Siddle and Smith/North for the first test.

My side
Watto
Kat
Punter
Pup
Huss
Smith/North
Haddin
Notch
Doherty
Hilfy
Dougy

12th man North/Smith
 
What happens if Doherty doesn't perform? Is his test career as long as Bryce McGain? That one test and Hauritz is called straight back?
 
The selectors really do bug me.
I'm not exactly sure why but I think its just the conservativeness of them to go with the contradictions in some of their selections.
Hauritz and Hughes have two poor games and get dropped, Hussey has two poor years yet continually gets retained and supported.
It seems like if you lose, you are more likely to stay in the side because they are banking on you bouncing back. Since the 09 Ashes, the only 2 changes have been 2 bowling spots, maybe 1 if Siddle gets picked.
Yet it was really the batsman that lost us the Ashes with their middle order collapses and since that series we still have been collapsing, ie vs West Indies in Perth where we were bowled out for 140 odd, Pakistan in Sydney for 120 odd, NZ in the last Test where we made 260 after being 2/190 odd, Pakistan in England where we made 82, and in both Tests against India.
If you look at how our batsman have performed since the Ashes series, especially the middle order, in todays day and age, they're not great figures, in fact they are all below their career average despite playing some mediocre opposition:

Ponting 12 Tests : 43.09
Clarke: - 12 Tests: 47.21
Hussey - 12 Tests: 40.15
North - 12 Tests: 31.31
Haddin - 8 Tests: 36.60
 
another player who could come into contention if players lose form is cam white who showed that he can bat composed but is probably to much of a risk to carry in with his hit and miss style of play
 
Worse thing that has ever happened to the state of Australian cricket is having Merv Hughes as a selector.

Johnson and Siddle in front of Bollinger is a complete joke. Bollinger at 70% fitness offers more than Siddle in career best form
 
@Jazza said:
The selectors really do bug me.
I'm not exactly sure why but I think its just the conservativeness of them to go with the contradictions in some of their selections.
Hauritz and Hughes have two poor games and get dropped, Hussey has two poor years yet continually gets retained and supported.
It seems like if you lose, you are more likely to stay in the side because they are banking on you bouncing back. Since the 09 Ashes, the only 2 changes have been 2 bowling spots, maybe 1 if Siddle gets picked.
Yet it was really the batsman that lost us the Ashes with their middle order collapses and since that series we still have been collapsing, ie vs West Indies in Perth where we were bowled out for 140 odd, Pakistan in Sydney for 120 odd, NZ in the last Test where we made 260 after being 2/190 odd, Pakistan in England where we made 82, and in both Tests against India.
If you look at how our batsman have performed since the Ashes series, especially the middle order, in todays day and age, they're not great figures, in fact they are all below their career average despite playing some mediocre opposition:

Ponting 12 Tests : 43.09
Clarke: - 12 Tests: 47.21
Hussey - 12 Tests: 40.15
North - 12 Tests: 31.31
Haddin - 8 Tests: 36.60

Ponting would be ok if he didn't get run out every time he got a decent start. Haddin as a wicketkeeper that's not too bad an average especially as our 5 and 6 have been getting out cheaply and putting him under pressure almost every innings.

North unacceptable seeing as though the bulk of those runs were in one innings. Hussey borderline. It's a shame that Hughes or even Jaques isn't in form. Personally I'd rather see a bona fide opener and Watson batting 6.
 
@smeghead said:
Worse thing that has ever happened to the state of Australian cricket is having Merv Hughes as a selector.

Johnson and Siddle in front of Bollinger is a complete joke. Bollinger at 70% fitness offers more than Siddle in career best form

They show way too much inconsistency. Doherty gets picked ahead of Hauritz, though North still retains his place despite showing less value to the side than Hauritz. Siddle hasn't played a test in months, and Johnson retains his spot on one first class match.

If they want to be taken seriously, they'll punt North for Uzi and pick Bolly ahead of Siddle (Merv was definitely wearing his Bushrangers cap when he picked Siddle.)
 
north is just not good enough at test level. he's not good enough at batting or bowling at test level.
 
what happened to phil hughes and phil jacques. i used to think those 2 were pretty good batsmen.
 
Hughes is opening for NSW, although he missed the 17 man squad, if Kat or Watto slip up, he'll be right back in there. Jaques doesn't even open for NSW anymore, and from memory, his performances in the 09-10 domestic season was pretty ordinary.
 
@alien said:
what happened to phil hughes and phil jacques. i used to think those 2 were pretty good batsmen.

Jaques hurt his back and lost his spot to Phil Hughes. Once you do a back, your pretty much gone. Hughes came in averaging 80 into the last Ashes. Got dropped when his average fell to 55 and replaced with Watson. Watson was only supposed to be a stop-gap. However he has excelled there and they don't want to mess with it. However they don't want to mess with a poor middle order either. Changes had to be made against Pakistan in England so the team would have cohesion in this Ashes with both the Indian and Pakistan series.

North is way to hit-and-miss and Watson with his all-round duties would be the perfect 6\. Hughes should have been brought back in. Hussey has really struggled. Ferguson getting injured I thought would open the door for Cameron White who at the time was our saviour in the ODI format. His still getting big scores now. It all happened when he put his bowling in the back-seat. White should have been the 5 just like Hodge should have gotten in earlier. Khawaja I think is still a little green. Let him score more runs in Shield. Next number 3 in my opinion.

The biggest issue is the selection of the bowlers. Siddle over Bollinger. Disgrace. Bollinger is our number 1 bowler. Pace, swing, bounce, attitude, smarts and hard-work. Hilfenhaus is the number 2\. Superb swing bowler. Will hopefully knock Strauss and Cook out for nothing each time. Johnson hasn't held any real improvement since his debut. He went backwards after South Africa where he looked the next cricket superstar. Than come the Ashes and he did nothing. Surely the spat between his mother and girlfriend was an influence. However he hasn't recovered it since. That just must have been his zone.
Than you have Siddle. Hard-work, yes. Attitude, yes. Pace, yes. Swing, no. Composure, no. The bloke tries as hard as anyone. He can rush a batsman and can get something out of a close to lifeless pitch. However, he has never swung a ball on purpose and doesn't have any idea on how to deal with an aggressive batsman. The Sri Lankans took it to him at Melbourne and he was ordinary. Nothing. This was Matthews and Malinga. Not Sangakarra and Jaywardene. His a favourite of Punter cause he bowls to a plan and tries hard. Like no-one else does that?
The dumb thing is Doherty over Hauritz. Thats juts panic stations. Doherty has been a fringe state player for years. Shows some form and cements a state spot. Gets an ODI when Hauritz is injured and gets 4 wickets. Seen as the net saviour after showing Hauritz loyalty and confidence. Dumping his is dumb. Will Doherty last longer than McGain, Casson, White's leg-spinners? Hauritz had the spot and was doing a good job. And you took it away from him after one ODI.

I think the selectors are off their heads for me continually picking green players and not dropping players way out of form. North and Hussey should be very thankful. As should Johnson who has been a passenger. Ponting needs to pull his head in and realise the short ball is causing him some problems. Lucky Clarke, Katich and Watson have been performing. Lets go through the list of thoughtless selections. White as a spinner. Peter George. Steve Smith as a spinner. Josh Hazlewood going on tour. Mitchell Starc in the ODIs. Graham Manou. John Hastings. Daniel Christian. Are these blokes the next performing best? Do they deserve it?
Why hasn't George Bailey been given a go. Who did James Hopes sleep with? Can Dirk Nannes only bowl 4 overs in match?
 
thats not good what happened to jaques. he was going well at test level.

what happened to that ryan harris bloke???
 
@Marshall_magic said:
Hughes is opening for NSW, although he missed the 17 man squad, if Kat or Watto slip up, he'll be right back in there. Jaques doesn't even open for NSW anymore, and from memory, his performances in the 09-10 domestic season was pretty ordinary.

i doubt they would get the boot BUT dropping Watson down the order to number 6 might be a good idea and then they can bring in Hughes
 
The probably have North in the team because they say he is an allrounder BUT Watson is a much better allrounder than North
 
@alien said:
thats not good what happened to jaques. he was going well at test level.

what happened to that ryan harris bloke???

Got 9 wickets against South Australia and pulled up a little lame. His had a chequered history in regards to fitness. Not sure whether he will feature in the test series. Siddle is one of the 3 quicks and Bollinger would be next. If injury strikes he will be an option.
 
Alien's Aussie XI assuming no injuries.

Katich
Hughes
Ponting
Clarke
Hussey
Watson
Haddin
Smith
Johnson
Harris
Bollinger
 

Latest posts

Back
Top