happy_tiger
Well-known member
Qld beat SA far more often than Australia beat SA away from home
I think SA have rolled Australia for under 100 3 times since the turn of the century
Cricket Season Thread
- Thread starter citizen_cub
- Start date
I think SA have rolled Australia for under 100 3 times since the turn of the century
davey_farrell
Well-known member
One of your best Happy, one of your best 🙂
Betterdays22
Well-known member
Buttface
Well-known member
Buttface
Well-known member
And yes Pup is still a suk.
Buttface
Well-known member
Yep, it’s average reading. Sam looked good but I don’t think the opponent was on test level, some are old, and others aren’t openers, Connerly into the mid order asap and Konstas, but I’d prefer he had more shield innings but we are where we are.
Batting averages first 2 tests show 3 batsmen failing with averages below 30
Maddinson ave 14
Webster ave 16
Smith ave 21
Carey ave 25 which is normally acceptable for a keeper
Head 39 ,Marnus 32 , and Renshaw 74 pass this very basic criteria
You can't drop Smith who has a career ave of 55 if he is FULLY FIT ?
That means Maddinson and Webster should be replaced with Connolly and Inglis .
If reinstating Lyon then keeping Boland means Hazo misses out
He got sick in PE and came back in looking like he was still ill
Wickets Hazo 8 ( all in 1st test )
Starc 6 ,Cummins 4 ,Boland 5 ( all in 2nd test )
Note both Cummins and Hazelwood wicketless in 2nd test
All in All the kindest word to describe our 2nd test performance is ---
DISGRACEFUL
Maddinson ave 14
Webster ave 16
Smith ave 21
Carey ave 25 which is normally acceptable for a keeper
Head 39 ,Marnus 32 , and Renshaw 74 pass this very basic criteria
You can't drop Smith who has a career ave of 55 if he is FULLY FIT ?
That means Maddinson and Webster should be replaced with Connolly and Inglis .
If reinstating Lyon then keeping Boland means Hazo misses out
He got sick in PE and came back in looking like he was still ill
Wickets Hazo 8 ( all in 1st test )
Starc 6 ,Cummins 4 ,Boland 5 ( all in 2nd test )
Note both Cummins and Hazelwood wicketless in 2nd test
All in All the kindest word to describe our 2nd test performance is ---
DISGRACEFUL
happy_tiger
Well-known member
I wouldn't be dropping him , but our least effective quick in South Africa has been Pat
