Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@ said:@ said:Deep down I think Woods would be seething. You could tell he had established a very good relationship with Cleary. Sad in a way, he could been a one club man. Instead, he went through a period where he believed he was bigger than the club and made a decision he’ll always regret.
I think you're half right. He certainly will regret it in the short term, but the Dogs aren't a club that tolerate poor performance for too long. They'll bounce back in a year or two and Woods may find himself regularly singing the team song.
@ said:@ said:@ said:Deep down I think Woods would be seething. You could tell he had established a very good relationship with Cleary. Sad in a way, he could been a one club man. Instead, he went through a period where he believed he was bigger than the club and made a decision he’ll always regret.
I think you're half right. He certainly will regret it in the short term, but the Dogs aren't a club that tolerate poor performance for too long. They'll bounce back in a year or two and Woods may find himself regularly singing the team song.
Quite possibly, but I think there will be a bit of pain for at least this year. I thought it was pretty damning when the rumours were swirling that he might backflip and when asked he never quashed it, he said “I don’t know what’s happening”. Not the words of somebody who was happy with his decision.
@ said:Deep down I think Woods would be seething. You could tell he had established a very good relationship with Cleary. Sad in a way, he could been a one club man. Instead, he went through a period where he believed he was bigger than the club and made a decision he’ll always regret.
@ said:I really never want to hear about those 3 players ever again. Regardless of the context.
@ said:@ said:I really never want to hear about those 3 players ever again. Regardless of the context.
Well, don’t read posts with the heading. ” Dib Lifts Lid On Moses, Tedesco and Woods”.
That’d be a good first step to take
:unamused:
@ said:I find it hard to believe anyone who says "my biggest problem is I'm too trusting", and in regards to the salary cap "we were too honest", and then goes on to talk about negotiations that involved an ex employee who is suing his organisation.
I prefer our fluff pieces to reading a Bulldogs fantasy story.
@ said:Deep down I think Woods would be seething. You could tell he had established a very good relationship with Cleary. Sad in a way, he could been a one club man. Instead, he went through a period where he believed he was bigger than the club and made a decision he’ll always regret.
@ said:Interesting if true. Lends a bit of credence to the idea that Teddy would've stayed if Moses was signed on.
Or maybe they just planned to go to another club together all along. They seemed awfully happy to leave Wests Tigers behind.
Woods, for all the s*** he cops, seems like the only one who wanted to stay.
@ said:Woods, for all the rubbish he cops, seems like the only one who wanted to stay.
@ said:@ said:Interesting if true. Lends a bit of credence to the idea that Teddy would've stayed if Moses was signed on.
Or maybe they just planned to go to another club together all along. They seemed awfully happy to leave Wests Tigers behind.
Woods, for all the s*** he cops, seems like the only one who wanted to stay.
We kept Dorothy. The Scarecrow (Woods - no brain), Tinman (Moses - no heart) and Lion (Tedesco) all chose to stay in Oz.