Donald Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon

Status
Not open for further replies.
shout out to Tigerdave, Milky and a special shout out to Tony33 the most confused member of this forum.

"It's hard to win an argument with a smart person, but it's damn near impossible to win an argument with a stupid person."
– Bill Murray

I dont argue let alone try and have a logical debate with SJW regressives, its a lost cause from the outset.

Good day
 
@Dingo said:
shout out to Tigerdave, Milky and a special shout out to Tony33 the most confused member of this forum.

"It's hard to win an argument with a smart person, but it's damn near impossible to win an argument with a stupid person."
– Bill Murray

I dont argue let alone try and have a logical debate with SJW regressives, its a lost cause from the outset.

Good day

Sore loser :laughing:
 
@Dingo said:
shout out to Tigerdave, Milky and a special shout out to Tony33 the most confused member of this forum.

"It's hard to win an argument with a smart person, but it's damn near impossible to win an argument with a stupid person."
– Bill Murray

I dont argue let alone try and have a logical debate with SJW regressives, its a lost cause from the outset.

Good day

Glad you have acknowledged the fact that you have dug yourself a massive hole that you can not get out of…
 
@Milky said:
@Dingo said:
@Tony33 said:
@Dingo said:
Your list doesn't go on Milky, it just highlights you're delusional on the issue of global terrorism. of course not all terrorists attacks are done by Muslims, just the vast majority, BY FAR. Its embarrassing to even suggest otherwise.

I think Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon is a massive Knob for many reasons, his issues with Muslims I dont find to be one of them, been to Cologne recently? I have. I do love his normality of speaking and not publicly cow towing to be PC that has massively stuffed up Western society over the last 2 decades but i wouldn't want him to have his finger on the nuke button either, Im not a WW3 nut but I dont think Nth Korea as we know it today will still be around at the end of his 4 year term if he gets in, unlike the current administration he wouldn't care if pisses off China. Who knows what that could lead to, China is itching to flex its muscles, its been working out for a long time and may think about stepping into the ring for a few rounds. Japan as a nation would be collectively praying every night that Clinton trumps Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon.

But come on Milky weak weak weak, appalling retort there mate if ever ive seen one, We are talking about today, not 1925\. bringing up those groups as an argument to current global terrorist activities is a disgrace. The KKK, essentially defunct with less then 5000 members, the IRA, you were not even born the last time they made the news, ASALA, you are kidding me right? Anonymous? I actually laughed out loud to myself when i read that. Your list doesn't go on, my list on the other hand…

Islamic terrorists, lets see...

Ill just go with this little chestnut, Boko Harem and ISIL between the 2 groups in the last 5 years have killed 50,000+ people and displaced more then 5 million people (UN stats) That on its own is enough to stifle your argument. Can you comprehend those numbers mate?? Thats embarrassing to your point and its absolutely disgraceful that you would compare any other terrorism to the atrocities going on around the world at the hands of the ''religion of peace''. I'll stop there, on that one point, I wont even mention the contemporary death tolls, casualties and displacements from The Taliban, Hezbollah, Hamas, Al-Shabaab, Al-Qaeda, Al-Nusra Front, ETIM, IBDA, Lashkar-e-Taiba, Lashkar-e-Jhangvi etc etc etc

My list CAN go on and on

Over the last 10 years its estimated 150-250,000 people have died from Islamic terrorism. The times we are living in. Not 1920 when the KKK was a thing.
\
\
Ill sit back now and wait for someone to deflect and try to equalize the horrific atrocities of Muslims by pointing out the abortion killings over the past 25 years....all 11 of them

I was reading your comment with interest Dingo and found myself agreeing with the majority of your post until you mentioned Hezbollah as a terrorist organisation displacing people.

Just because America categorises Hezbollah as a terrorist group it doesn't mean it is a terrorist group. The only crime Hezbollah is guilty of committing is being opposed to Israel's foreign policy in the middle east, which America uses as grounds for labelling as a terrorist organisation.

Hezbollah was in fact one of the only organisations fighting ISIS in the middle east when the rest of the world was sitting on its hands. They are not terrorists and in fact are moderate, accepting muslims who live opposed to the extremists who continually tarnish their name.

Don't let western media fool you into thinking otherwise.

The Arab League, United States, France, the Gulf Cooperation Council, **Australia**, Canada, the Netherlands, and Israel have classified Hezbollah as a terrorist organization

Last time i checked I was an Australian Citizen, are you? If so, your government has stated they are a terrorist nation, sorry pal. #factshurt

You want to talk about terrorism? Well get your own facts right, if you believe that ISIS funded itself and all of a sudden became who it is today without the financial assistance of other countries E.G AMERICA, then i believe you are on the deluded side.

America funded ISIS in order to take down the Syrian President, not knowing that it would bite them in the backside, America basically created ISIS, they are fighting their own creation.

Hazebollah is a terorist organisation? That made me chuckle, they are the main enemy of ISIS, they want to bring them down more than anybody else does, they don't kill innocent civillians, their aim is to protect Lebanon and Syria, not cause harm, have you ever seen a Hezebollah attack on the news? No you haven't, just because America or Australia say so, doesn't mean they are.

You've done a great job debating this Milky and I agree with your overall sentiments but you're on less solid ground. Hezbellah are many things but one of them is a terror group who murders opponents. They do kill civilians. Sure they believe they have justification for doing so but let's not pretend they're nice guys. If you monitor Lebanese media like I do then you'd read plenty of stuff before the Syrian conflict. Right now they're busy propping up Assad.

Of course they're IS's enemy. They're a Shia group and IS hate them. It's not really true at all to state IS are an American creation. They basically started in Jordan before the leadership moved to Iraq. It's simplistic to say they were an Al Qaeda offshoot. The relationship is complex but those guys were already operational before they became AQI. And they never really took orders from them. If they didn't have former Ba'athists milltary help they wouldn't have got any further than any of the other insurgent groups.
 
@Yossarian said:
@Milky said:
@Dingo said:
@Tony33 said:
I was reading your comment with interest Dingo and found myself agreeing with the majority of your post until you mentioned Hezbollah as a terrorist organisation displacing people.

Just because America categorises Hezbollah as a terrorist group it doesn't mean it is a terrorist group. The only crime Hezbollah is guilty of committing is being opposed to Israel's foreign policy in the middle east, which America uses as grounds for labelling as a terrorist organisation.

Hezbollah was in fact one of the only organisations fighting ISIS in the middle east when the rest of the world was sitting on its hands. They are not terrorists and in fact are moderate, accepting muslims who live opposed to the extremists who continually tarnish their name.

Don't let western media fool you into thinking otherwise.

The Arab League, United States, France, the Gulf Cooperation Council, **Australia**, Canada, the Netherlands, and Israel have classified Hezbollah as a terrorist organization

Last time i checked I was an Australian Citizen, are you? If so, your government has stated they are a terrorist nation, sorry pal. #factshurt

You want to talk about terrorism? Well get your own facts right, if you believe that ISIS funded itself and all of a sudden became who it is today without the financial assistance of other countries E.G AMERICA, then i believe you are on the deluded side.

America funded ISIS in order to take down the Syrian President, not knowing that it would bite them in the backside, America basically created ISIS, they are fighting their own creation.

Hazebollah is a terorist organisation? That made me chuckle, they are the main enemy of ISIS, they want to bring them down more than anybody else does, they don't kill innocent civillians, their aim is to protect Lebanon and Syria, not cause harm, have you ever seen a Hezebollah attack on the news? No you haven't, just because America or Australia say so, doesn't mean they are.

You've done a great job debating this Milky and I agree with your overall sentiments but you're on less solid ground. Hezbellah are many things but one of them is a terror group who murders opponents. They do kill civilians. Sure they believe they have justification for doing so but let's not pretend they're nice guys. If you monitor Lebanese media like I do then you'd read plenty of stuff before the Syrian conflict. Right now they're busy propping up Assad.

Of course they're IS's enemy. They're a Shia group and IS hate them. It's not really true at all to state IS are an American creation. They basically started in Jordan before the leadership moved to Iraq. It's simplistic to say they were an Al Qaeda offshoot. The relationship is complex but those guys were already operational before they became AQI. And they never really took orders from them. If they didn't have former Ba'athists milltary help they wouldn't have got any further than any of the other insurgent groups.

I understand where you are coming from but Hezebollah is no where near as threatening as others such as IS. For instance ISIS constantly attacks states in order to instil fear where as Hezebollah keeps to itself, its main aim is to protect Syria and Lebanons border as opposed to taking over the world or killing a certain race.

Its quite plain and simple, don't mess with Hezebollah and they don't mess with you, whereas ISIS will pick at you.

Hezebollah by no means aims to take over the world, by no means do they aim to enforce Sharia law within all countries nor do they want to attack anybody. Their aim is to keep Assad as president and protect their state, they will never ever conduct any terror attacks the way other terrorist organisations do.
 
I'm certainly not putting Hezbollah on the same level as IS. The former is a fairly broad group with a genuine degree of support amongst the community. The latter are just nuts. That said they've blown up enough people whose only crime is to publicly disagreed with them. That's just unacceptable and to their detriment. I don't think the Lebanese state is going to crumble if there is a paticipatory political system.
 
This thread became hijacked so severely I had to check what it was about…Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon.

Yeah he looks like being in a race with Hillary for president. Americans have a hard decision to make. Personally I'd go for the Don as Clinton is pure evil. Don is just dumb.
 
@Dingo said:
shout out to Tigerdave, Milky and a special shout out to Tony33 the most confused member of this forum.

"It's hard to win an argument with a smart person, but it's damn near impossible to win an argument with a stupid person."
– Bill Murray

I dont argue let alone try and have a logical debate with SJW regressives, its a lost cause from the outset.

Good day

Failed to understand anything, clearly didn't read a thing, so just like a pigeon playing chess you knock over the chess pieces and declare yourself the victor.
 
@Tony33 said:
Dingo sounds like a more grammaticaly skilled reincarnation of Jerry :laughing:

He claims that 99.6% of muslims are terrorists.

He also presents facts that suggest that Islamic terrorists are responsible for 250,000 deaths and 10-15 million displaced people.

But then wouldn't all these victims not really be victims because they are muslims who are 99.6% terrorists ?

How does that work ?

So terrorists are killing other terrorists ?

I'm confused..

which is what I questioned. I also asked for a citation on his 99.6%….....easy to "win" arguments I guess when you just make stuff up or present how you feel rather than actual facts.
 
@stryker said:
This thread became hijacked so severely I had to check what it was about…Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon.

Yeah he looks like being in a race with Hillary for president. Americans have a hard decision to make. Personally I'd go for the Don as Clinton is pure evil. Don is just dumb.

I watched a documentary the other night which suggests that Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon has angered to many minority groups to win an election.

I cant remember the actual numbers but if you take out the hispanics, muslims and blacks (with under 5% voting for Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon) then he would need something like 80% of white Americans to vote for him to succeed as president.

They claimed it was to unlikely for him to become president.

They also suggested that if he did become president he would more then likely become alot calmer. In essence his current persona was an act designed to instill fear in the population and culminate in his election as the president to save the country.

If he is elected and delivers on his promises I can see another world war. He reminds me alot of Adolf Hitler.
 
He would probably work out to be less dangerous than Cruz. Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon is just an egomaniacal windbag that wants power and status. I doubt he would do 5% of what he claims if he actually got the presidency, he would would be pragmatic enough to just coat along listening to advisers and would play the role of a "celebrity" president. He doesn't actually believe in anything except himself. He is spouting divisive crap at the moment because he knows it's popular.

Cruz on the other hand is an evangelical with extremely conservative views that he firmly believes in. He would be likely to try and make major social changes to the US. He is keeping a lid on the divisive crap he thinks but if he got power it would all bubble to the surface. Bullet dodged with him dropping out as far as I'm concerned.

They're both terrible people though and hopefully the Republicans get caned for putting forward such jerks as nominees.
 
@Tigerdave said:
@Tony33 said:
Dingo sounds like a more grammaticaly skilled reincarnation of Jerry :laughing:

He claims that 99.6% of muslims are terrorists.

He also presents facts that suggest that Islamic terrorists are responsible for 250,000 deaths and 10-15 million displaced people.

But then wouldn't all these victims not really be victims because they are muslims who are 99.6% terrorists ?

How does that work ?

So terrorists are killing other terrorists ?

I'm confused..

which is what I questioned. I also asked for a citation on his 99.6%….....easy to "win" arguments I guess when you just make stuff up or present how you feel rather than actual facts.

"Aw, you can come up with statistics to prove anything, Kent. Forty percent of all people know that."

- Homer Simpson
 
@stryker said:
This thread became hijacked so severely I had to check what it was about…Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon.

Yeah he looks like being in a race with Hillary for president. Americans have a hard decision to make. Personally I'd go for the Don as Clinton is pure evil. Don is just dumb.

Reminds me of the South Park mascot election. They've got to choose between a turd sandwich and a giant douche.

Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon is probably more of a international issue for the yanks with the way he'd handle international affairs, whereas Cruz is part of the GOP machine and would have hosted a raft of internal issues for the US.

Democrats had a good opportunity with Sanders to actually elect a relatively altruistic politician (at the very least by US standards,) and they chose the one who's chummy with the Wall Street Bankers. Clinton will do nothing for the average American.
 
@stryker said:
This thread became hijacked so severely I had to check what it was about…Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon.

Yeah he looks like being in a race with Hillary for president. Americans have a hard decision to make. Personally I'd go for the Don as Clinton is pure evil. Don is just dumb.

I wouldn't say she is evil. Lacks substance and doesn't stand for anything of note sure. A wannabe populist driven my goals rather than ideals or policy, sure. But evil is a stretch.
 
This guy certainly keeps the surprises coming. He would almost qualify as leader of an NRL Ratpack of Carney, Pearce etc.. Bill Clinton kept his dirty laundry behind closed doors whereas this guy boasts. I don't think he will win.
 
As much as Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon is a goose I'm sure the processes in place and real politicians will keep him in check to a certain degree.
Clinton on the other hand will continue Obamas breakdown of the world and even greater conflict with Russia.
How the lefty Obama loving American press leaves his disasters alone is amazing.
Years back I was amazed to see Obama backing the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt to the extent of getting them elected - against the Egyptian peoples wishes.
Then look what happened to the rest of the Arab world that Obama 'didn't get on with'.
 
There's something severely broken when they are your options. You may even see a big turnout for the independent candidate. He doesn't even know where or what Aleppo is, though.
 
@cktiger said:
As much as Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon is a goose I'm sure the processes in place and real politicians will keep him in check to a certain degree.
Clinton on the other hand will continue Obamas breakdown of the world and even greater conflict with Russia.
How the lefty Obama loving American press leaves his disasters alone is amazing.
Years back I was amazed to see Obama backing the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt to the extent of getting them elected - against the Egyptian peoples wishes.
Then look what happened to the rest of the Arab world that Obama 'didn't get on with'.

I think the revolution was initially being led by secularists but taken over by force by the Brotherhood. One good thing the Brotherhood done was open the boarders with Palestine to give them some relief from Israel's blockade. Maybe the only good thing the Brotherhood done but they may have been sabotaged by Hosni Muburak's supporters whom stayed in govt. I think Obama was trying to get a peaceful transfer of power rather than a protracted killing affair as these often turn out to be. Obama cannot be blamed for the eventual outcome.

The previous USA presidents also created the Mubuark problem by propping him up for decades though he was corrupt and brutal.

It was not the USA that led the unrest in Egypt whereas it did under Republicans in Iraq and they panned out shockingly, thus ISIS etc.

Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon would have to be the worse baboon to be in the hot seat. He could attempt to sway world leaders with dancing girls, beauty pageants and bunny girls. It actually works in some repressive countries.
 
@cktiger said:
As much as Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon is a goose I'm sure the processes in place and real politicians will keep him in check to a certain degree.
Clinton on the other hand will continue Obamas breakdown of the world and even greater conflict with Russia.
How the lefty Obama loving American press leaves his disasters alone is amazing.
Years back I was amazed to see Obama backing the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt to the extent of getting them elected - against the Egyptian peoples wishes.
Then look what happened to the rest of the Arab world that Obama 'didn't get on with'.

Please elaborate CK, as I would like to be informed on what I seem to have missed on how Obama controlled the Egyptian election or influenced the voters, and what his policies created in the other countries in the region.

The "real politicians" should have dumped Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon when they had the opportunity as the primaries concluded, but they seemed to think he was their best chance.
 
@formerguest said:
@cktiger said:
As much as Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon is a goose I'm sure the processes in place and real politicians will keep him in check to a certain degree.
Clinton on the other hand will continue Obamas breakdown of the world and even greater conflict with Russia.
How the lefty Obama loving American press leaves his disasters alone is amazing.
Years back I was amazed to see Obama backing the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt to the extent of getting them elected - against the Egyptian peoples wishes.
Then look what happened to the rest of the Arab world that Obama 'didn't get on with'.

Please elaborate CK, **as I would like to be informed on what I seem to have missed on how Obama controlled the Egyptian election or influenced the voters**, and what his policies created in the other countries in the region.

The "real politicians" should have dumped Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon when they had the opportunity as the primaries concluded, but they seemed to think he was their best chance.

You can ask any Egyptian if they voted for the Muslim Brotherhood and you wouldn't get too many yes's.
Obama is not too keen on any Arab country that has army to look after themselves, and Egypt has the biggest.
Obama and Clinton orchestrated the rise of the Brotherhood (who have always been trying to take over Egypt and send it back into the dark ages).
Simply put, they thought that once the Brotherhood were in power they would strangle the control of the army.
Unfortunately they miscalculated the will of the people - who are more than happy to have a strong military backing their leader.
Once the Brotherhood were elected tourism ground to a halt - taking with it the livelihoods of a large chunk of the Egyptian people.
It didn't take long for the people to beg el-Sisi (the current President and former head of the Egyptian Military Forces) to take the country back.
If you look at every other Arab country in trouble now you won't have to look hard to see Obama and Clinton's fingerprints.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Members online

Back
Top