Duel Badgers..

[innsaneink]

Haha badge & vadge…. Pay that!

 

[Chicken_Faced_Killa]

That fact she would be on our game because it doesn't have an impact on the finals would be more to do with it being her first game rather than the fact she is a women. Anyone you debuts in round 26 isn't going to be given a game that could decide a teams fate it's a big step up

 

[Spud_Murphy]

That fact she would be on our game because it doesn't have an impact on the finals would be more to do with it being her first game rather than the fact she is **a women**. Anyone you debuts in round 26 isn't going to be given a game that could decide a teams fate it's a big step up

A womAn - why do people always have trouble writing and saying the word woman? Happens a lot and I have no idea why. We have no trouble saying man or men in the right context, but seem to be put off by the 'wo' for some reason. Not having a go at you, Chicken Faced Killa, it's just something I see more people do than not and I find it strange.

 

[jadtiger]

She couldnt be worse than her husband so i dont see any problem with it

 

[Sabre]

"The game has no bearing on the finals race".

Because we wouldn't want a woman in charge of a game that was. Just shows that it has nothing to do with giving a woman a game because she's earned it, rather just because she's a woman.

Yep 100%.
There are probably blokes reffing lower grades doing an outstanding job but they don't get the attention because they are just another guy in the line.
The fact they are saying either Sleeman or Badger shows they just want to pick a woman. I can't comment on either of their ability as a main ref, but from what I've seen in first grade neither stand out as great touchies. And as has already been said, Sleeman has one of the worst sideline calls the game has ever seen attached to her name.

 

[Chicken_Faced_Killa]

That fact she would be on our game because it doesn't have an impact on the finals would be more to do with it being her first game rather than the fact she is **a women**. Anyone you debuts in round 26 isn't going to be given a game that could decide a teams fate it's a big step up

A womAn - why do people always have trouble writing and saying the word woman? Happens a lot and I have no idea why. We have no trouble saying man or men in the right context, but seem to be put off by the 'wo' for some reason. Not having a go at you, Chicken Faced Killa, it's just something I see more people do than not and I find it strange.

Fair enough mate, an error on my part. wrote it quickly on my phone. Promise I will double check all grammar next time :wink: :laughing:

 

[Oggyz]

Providing her husband has given her permission I don't see the problem with it.

 

[Russell]

If she is as hopeless as Gavin…

Certainly would have to be a better ref than she is a touchie.

 

[Fade_To_Black]

Providing her husband has given her permission I don't see the problem with it.

Classic :roll

 

[Cultured_Bogan]

I'm tipping she'll be twice the ref her husband is. He has lost the plot.

 

[westTAHger]

**Why not let both the women, ref a game each.** :bulb:
Storm v- raiders, Storm cannot finish anywhere but first, if raiders are good enough to win they will.
Wests-tigers v warriors, a battle of the teams who pluck defeat from the jaws of victory..

 

[Harvey]

**Why not let both the women, ref a game each.** :bulb:
Storm v- raiders, Storm cannot finish anywhere but first, if raiders are good enough to win they will.
Wests-tigers v warriors, a battle of the teams who pluck defeat from the jaws of victory..

Let them referee together.

 

[TurnStyle]

That fact she would be on our game because it doesn't have an impact on the finals would be more to do with it being her first game rather than the fact she is **a women**. Anyone you debuts in round 26 isn't going to be given a game that could decide a teams fate it's a big step up

A womAn - why do people always have trouble writing and saying the word woman? Happens a lot and I have no idea why. We have no trouble saying man or men in the right context, but seem to be put off by the 'wo' for some reason. Not having a go at you, Chicken Faced Killa, it's just something I see more people do than not and I find it strange.

…Not to mention the title says "Duel" rather than "Dual"... are they going to sort their domestic issues at ten paces during an NRL game?! :laughing:

 

[Geo]

That was on purpose.. :wink:

 

[Sabre]

**Why not let both the women, ref a game each.** :bulb:
Storm v- raiders, Storm cannot finish anywhere but first, if raiders are good enough to win they will.
Wests-tigers v warriors, a battle of the teams who pluck defeat from the jaws of victory..

Let them referee together.

 

[TurnStyle]

That was on purpose.. :wink:


:laughing:

 

[steve-o]

A referee on debut is given a game with less scutiny… Seems fair enough to me.

 

[innsaneink]

**Why not let both the women, ref a game each.** :bulb:
Storm v- raiders, Storm cannot finish anywhere but first, if raiders are good enough to win they will.
Wests-tigers v warriors, a battle of the teams who pluck defeat from the jaws of victory..

Let them referee together.

In lingerie

 

[stryker]

**Why not let both the women, ref a game each.** :bulb:
Storm v- raiders, Storm cannot finish anywhere but first, if raiders are good enough to win they will.
Wests-tigers v warriors, a battle of the teams who pluck defeat from the jaws of victory..

Because that would be pandering.
If they have earned it they will be given a go. It shouldnt just be handed out because of gender.

 

[jadtiger]

**Why not let both the women, ref a game each.** :bulb:
Storm v- raiders, Storm cannot finish anywhere but first, if raiders are good enough to win they will.
Wests-tigers v warriors, a battle of the teams who pluck defeat from the jaws of victory..

Let them referee together.

In lingerie

Thats one way to get a packed LO for the game