cochise
Well-known member
@jirskyr said in [Fittler's Team Merger List](/post/1192435) said:@supercoach said in [Fittler's Team Merger List](/post/1192301) said:Seriously if you were going to merge us with anyone it would be the Dogs as they basically are in between our Inner city territory and South West Territory. Of course a Souths Easts combo would make the most sense but that will never happen while the NRL are in bed with them
I said the same thing in the other thread. And honestly if we really did have to merge for the good of the game, I'd support it, even if that meant merging with the Bulldogs, literally my least-favoured team in the competition.
But I'd only support a merger if all the other clubs had to merge as well, to get the 9 Sydney teams down to a better number, which is probably 5: South-East Sydney Roostertohs, North Sydney and Central Coast Beagles, Inner West Tiger Dogs, Southern Sydney Shagons and the Western Sydney Peels.
Even then, that's 1M potential people per side (total Sydney population divided by 5, rather than local population of each district), which is 5.5x the population of Townsville, 2.5x the population of Canberra, 3x the population of Newcastle, 60% the population of Auckland and 50% the population of Perth.
So the argument about a crowded market sort of falls flat when you consider expansion locations and total population, taking into account just how massive Sydney is and how much it dwarfs other cities. Even, ideally, you'd want a second Melbourne team as rapidly as any other location, if ignorant of the knowledge that they barely support the first Melbourne team as it is.
I'd be hard pressed to follow a team if we merged again. I don't see how we can merge again and keep a representation of both our founding parents, to me that is nonnegotiable.