There are 2 which meets all of the club’s requirements!
Good modern facilities for corporate and supporters ,plenty of first class seating for premium memberships , centrally located (both) , easy transport options ( both) it is a figment of the imagination that these options do not meet the criteria of the club or the unwillingness of supporters to grasp reality !
This is my opinion and it will also become more evident as time passes ...
You certainly have been shoving your opinion down our throats!
Do you think we have dementia that you need to repeat the same think over and over.
I think most of us get where you are coming from Snake.
Bankwest!!!!!!! right.
My opinion is REJECT!!!!!
If we are looking at one ground Bankwest is the best option.
Absolutely no!
NRL should ban clubs from playing at ANZ, makes the game look bad.
There is $150,000 reasons per game at the ANZ why WTs should play out of that facility.
We are on the same deal at Bankwest, so not really a very good reason.
You have not come up with a single argument to make the case that Bankwest is better than ANZ. 3 games each at CSS and Leichhardt with the remainder at ANZ.
Have you skipped most the thread?
There are 60000 empty seats at ANZ when we play there, lol, it is an oval, the rake is terrible, it is in the middle of nowhere with nothing around it. All arguments I have made in the last few days. The arguments made against Bankwest are that it is in Parramatta. Your last argument was misleading, so I don't know how you can question my arguments lol.
@cochise said in [Four new suburban stadiums or grand final will go](/post/1156909) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Four new suburban stadiums or grand final will go](/post/1156906) said:
@cochise said in [Four new suburban stadiums or grand final will go](/post/1156903) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Four new suburban stadiums or grand final will go](/post/1156901) said:
@cochise said in [Four new suburban stadiums or grand final will go](/post/1156895) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Four new suburban stadiums or grand final will go](/post/1156891) said:
@cochise said in [Four new suburban stadiums or grand final will go](/post/1156877) said:
@Russell said in [Four new suburban stadiums or grand final will go](/post/1156876) said:
@Snake said in [Four new suburban stadiums or grand final will go](/post/1156873) said:
There are 2 which meets all of the club’s requirements!
Good modern facilities for corporate and supporters ,plenty of first class seating for premium memberships , centrally located (both) , easy transport options ( both) it is a figment of the imagination that these options do not meet the criteria of the club or the unwillingness of supporters to grasp reality !
This is my opinion and it will also become more evident as time passes ...
You certainly have been shoving your opinion down our throats!
Do you think we have dementia that you need to repeat the same think over and over.
I think most of us get where you are coming from Snake.
Bankwest!!!!!!! right.
My opinion is REJECT!!!!!
If we are looking at one ground Bankwest is the best option.
Absolutely no!
NRL should ban clubs from playing at ANZ, makes the game look bad.
There is $150,000 reasons per game at the ANZ why WTs should play out of that facility.
We are on the same deal at Bankwest, so not really a very good reason.
You have not come up with a single argument to make the case that Bankwest is better than ANZ. 3 games each at CSS and Leichhardt with the remainder at ANZ.
Have you skipped most the thread?
There are 60000 empty seats at ANZ when we play there, lol, it is an oval, the rake is terrible, it is in the middle of nowhere with nothing around it. All arguments I have made in the last few days. The arguments made against Bankwest are that it is in Parramatta. Your last argument was misleading, so I don't know how you can question my arguments lol.
As I said, you've got nothing.
lol, yep just like your usually posts hey. Just deny any arguments that you can't argue, seems like a trait with you.