I agree to some extent with Josh, I am not a Greenberg fan but the reality is that people have been dissatisfied with the CEO's (or equivalent) performance since rugby league existed.
Rugby League has been squandering opportunities and dealing with in-fighting since 1908, and it wasn't going to change on Greenberg's watch.
His main failing I think is that he was easy to dislike. Your average mug punter wouldn't honestly have any clue whether or not Greeberg was a good CEO, they wouldn't even know what the CEO's KPIs were and how he was performing against those. Mug punters only absorb the "at surface" items like "I didn't like the bunker" or "refs are doing a bad job" and then pointing back at the CEO.
Don't get me wrong, I'm a mug punter too, but I won't claim to know if Greenberg was actually any good at his job. All I can say is he lost the popularity contest.
All this other stuff, e.g. the cost of running the NRL - that's just reality of big income. Sure head office could have been more cost-effective in squirreling away funds, but that is true of any management and most of them spend within their means (i.e. if their means grow, so do their spending).
Similarly look at any given club and how much money they spend on non-player salaries since the salary cap was bumped up over the last 2 broadcast deals.
This latest report about missing funds, we are talking very small sums here. Certainly the accounting needs to be 100% accurate, but it's not enough to topple a CEO, and I'd challenge anyone to be certain that no other missing funds ever occurred within rugby league headquarters or any other state branch.
So keep in mind this almost excessive "fan celebration" in regards to Greenberg in 3-4 years when the next bloke has gotten his hands dirty and rugby league hasn't magically been fixed or cured of it's historical ills.
"Small sums of cash" might well sum up his latest stuff-up but where the hell is this $500 000 A DAY ending up? That is an astonishing figure. I'm willing to bet he's been skimming money for a while now, that's why he seems happy enough to walk away quietly before a real investigation into this exhorbitant spending got underway. He got off lightly IMO, very lightly.
Where has this 500k a day number even come from? NRL’d administration cost last year was $60k a day on average. To even get close to 500k a day you have to add game day costs, sponsorship, player welfare etc.
$500k a day is yet another thing being pushed by the media who wanted him out.
That is exactly what they did, they have even included match day hospitality for sponsors which cost $102m but brought in $205m last year.
Exactly mate. Looking at the number $500k a day without knowing the whole context is pointless. It’s a throwaway stat posted by the media to get Todd out.
I’m not even a fan of the bloke just think he’s copping some crap unfairly. If you look at the actual money he’s brought to the game it’s been good. Revenue in almost every area has gone up since he’s been in charge + has introduced the women’s game, international footy has grown and state of origin is growing nationally.
Biggest problem is that he didn’t have money put away for the virus - something a lot of businesses also didn’t do. It was never planned and now they’ve had to take a loan out because of it which isn’t good. Plus the Inglis and Cameron Smith stuff just looks bad as well.
Not having a proper CEO when the business could collapse due to the virus also doesn’t seem like a good idea to me
How has international footy grown?
How has State Of Origin grown nationally?....crowds are down for Origin, especially in NSW.
Not having a go at you mate, people who think Greenberg has been unfairly targetted aren't really stating much of a case for their arguments. Most people are of the opinion that the game has nosedived rapidly and considerably in many areas during Greenberg's reign.
More international games with more viewers than ever, there’s been more interest in international footy since a long time.
State of origin taken to other states with sold out crowds growing the game nationally plus women’s state of origin a big success.
I’m not even a fan of the bloke but the amount of people calling him the worst ever based off channel 9 articles (who wanted him gone) is laughable
I'm not basing my opinion of him being the worst RL CEO ever off of channel 9 articles. I'm basing my opinion of his tenure on his demonstrated inability to do his job properly. Nearly every decision he has made has been bad IMO. Getting paid over a million dollars a year to made continued poor decisions, blatant favouritism, demonstrated double-standards etc is laughable. He should never have got the job, his time at Canterbury wasn't exactly stellar and without dubious decisions involving some very important issues.
What decision of his didn’t you like? Besides the obvious ones like Inglis and Smith, which business decisions didn’t you like? That is what a CEO does after all.
He got appointed CEO because at the time he was considered the best club CEO. His issue at dogs was covering up the Ben Barba issues
You just answered your own question. Do you think what he did at the Bulldogs re: Barba's actions meant he should've been immediately scrapped as a potential candidate for the NRL CEO position? Yep. So do I.
That should of been done deal at that point right there.
You still don’t have an actual answer of what business decisions of his you didn’t like. Besides stuff that has nothing to do with actually making money you don’t know what he did
It's been answered a few times..but here goes again Committee's after Committee's to over see elements of the game that could be done by 1 person ..Refs, Bunker, Judiciary, Rules, Whole of Game, amount of air in ball etc etc..seeing a front office of 470 staff when one of biggest sporting organisations in the World EPL has about 170..
Holding off on paying into the players superannuation for 3 years leaving the NRL a debt that there was no need for as if you believe the NRL was making money in those years..
Crystal Balls and diamond rings for Mr and Mrs Cammy... testimonial games for a bloke who is still playing 2 years later..yet others nothing..
Personal References for some not others..
Fair but not equal in his opinion in relation to the No fault Stand down rule that was rushed through in a reactionary fashion rather than pro-active..
One more bloody person attempts to defend it
He’s lucky the ring’s weren’t made of corruption. Robbie not getting a testimonial and the treatment of Gal at end of same game was just as distasteful as it was disgraceful.
Regular theme of Greenberg leadership... and anybody saying there wasn’t other internal affairs resulting in his stepping down isn’t privy.
What internal affairs?
Umm... the commission .. that didn’t reveal anything publicly, yet encouraged media to toe the hard line. You can’t be that old AND naive?
Any further revelations would’ve done irreparable damage to Todd’s rep I’d say, but in terms of there being more than what’s presented at face value, you can’t argue it! Could’ve been ugly.
Instead we’re ready to go again - no Todd.
Coincidence??
OK
