Harry or JAC for 2022?

@insideman said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1269328) said:
Bullgrubs have signed a Melbourne hooker for 2022

B Smith. Heard the rumour a couple days ago. Guess it might be true
 
@insideman said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1269327) said:
@twentyforty said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1267572) said:
I think the Grant to Tigers option is still live. If Smith was retiring, he would have done it already. This delay is a ruse to get Grant and B Smith comfortable with the idea. I would prefer Harry over both Smiths at 9.
The bulldogs have signed a hooker from Melbourne for 2022 fingers crossed it’s not Grant

dude can you please reply to all the quotes you select outside of the over/under symbols please it's driving me mad. love your work but please
 
@insideman said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1269327) said:
@twentyforty said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1267572) said:
I think the Grant to Tigers option is still live. If Smith was retiring, he would have done it already. This delay is a ruse to get Grant and B Smith comfortable with the idea. I would prefer Harry over both Smiths at 9.
The bulldogs have signed a hooker from Melbourne for 2022 fingers crossed it’s not Grant


I know they were after Brandon.
 
They must be scrapping the barrel for cash lol they have citric on big money as well

How much is flanno on
 
@avocadoontoast said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1267649) said:
@Russell said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1267625) said:
Neither but would take Munster in a flash.

you don't want Harry Grant or JAC? Why? They'd be our two best players (by a considerable margin)

And Munster wouldn't?

Maybe you didn't understand what I said Avo.
 
@insideman said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1269328) said:
Bullgrubs have signed a Melbourne hooker for 2022

Someone from Jersey flegg most likely then. Dogs are a rabble and neither Smith or Grant are free to negotiate with anyone at this stage.

Dogs fans can barely read. Don't know why people take any sense in what they say
 
@balmain-boy said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1269486) said:
@insideman said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1269328) said:
Bullgrubs have signed a Melbourne hooker for 2022

Someone from Jersey flegg most likely then. Dogs are a rabble and neither Smith or Grant are free to negotiate with anyone at this stage.

Dogs fans can barely read. Don't know why people take any sense in what they say

They also seem to believe Trent Barrett is a messiah and that players go weak at the knees and sign immediately if he tries to recruit them.
 
@balmain-boy said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1269486) said:
@insideman said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1269328) said:
Bullgrubs have signed a Melbourne hooker for 2022

Someone from Jersey flegg most likely then. Dogs are a rabble and neither Smith or Grant are free to negotiate with anyone at this stage.

Dogs fans can barely read. Don't know why people take any sense in what they say


They have signed one of the two. They are allowed to negotiate from November 1. I don’t know who it is but it’s grant or Brendan smith
 
@insideman said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1269584) said:
@balmain-boy said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1269486) said:
@insideman said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1269328) said:
Bullgrubs have signed a Melbourne hooker for 2022

Someone from Jersey flegg most likely then. Dogs are a rabble and neither Smith or Grant are free to negotiate with anyone at this stage.

Dogs fans can barely read. Don't know why people take any sense in what they say


They have signed one of the two. They are allowed to negotiate from November 1. I don’t know who it is but it’s grant or Brendan smith

Incorrect. Both players at Under contract on long term deals and all clubs are unable to officially negotiate, at least until Can makes up his mind
 
@balmain-boy said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1269639) said:
@insideman said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1269584) said:
@balmain-boy said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1269486) said:
@insideman said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1269328) said:
Bullgrubs have signed a Melbourne hooker for 2022

Someone from Jersey flegg most likely then. Dogs are a rabble and neither Smith or Grant are free to negotiate with anyone at this stage.

Dogs fans can barely read. Don't know why people take any sense in what they say


They have signed one of the two. They are allowed to negotiate from November 1. I don’t know who it is but it’s grant or Brendan smith

Incorrect. Both players at Under contract on long term deals and all clubs are unable to officially negotiate, at least until Can makes up his mind


Trust me they have signed one of the 2
 
@insideman said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1270662) said:
@balmain-boy said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1269639) said:
@insideman said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1269584) said:
@balmain-boy said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1269486) said:
@insideman said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1269328) said:
Bullgrubs have signed a Melbourne hooker for 2022

Someone from Jersey flegg most likely then. Dogs are a rabble and neither Smith or Grant are free to negotiate with anyone at this stage.

Dogs fans can barely read. Don't know why people take any sense in what they say


They have signed one of the two. They are allowed to negotiate from November 1. I don’t know who it is but it’s grant or Brendan smith

Incorrect. Both players at Under contract on long term deals and all clubs are unable to officially negotiate, at least until Can makes up his mind


Trust me they have signed one of the 2

It’s not Smith.
 
@insideman said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1270662) said:
@balmain-boy said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1269639) said:
@insideman said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1269584) said:
@balmain-boy said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1269486) said:
@insideman said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1269328) said:
Bullgrubs have signed a Melbourne hooker for 2022

Someone from Jersey flegg most likely then. Dogs are a rabble and neither Smith or Grant are free to negotiate with anyone at this stage.

Dogs fans can barely read. Don't know why people take any sense in what they say


They have signed one of the two. They are allowed to negotiate from November 1. I don’t know who it is but it’s grant or Brendan smith

Incorrect. Both players at Under contract on long term deals and all clubs are unable to officially negotiate, at least until Can makes up his mind


Trust me they have signed one of the 2

If they have, they've seriously broken the NRLs.contractual requirements. Both players are under contract for two more years and the Storm want to keep both. Illegal to negotiate and easy to prove it.

Someone's yanking your chain
 
Back
Top