Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@insideman said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1269328) said:Bullgrubs have signed a Melbourne hooker for 2022
@insideman said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1269327) said:@twentyforty said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1267572) said:I think the Grant to Tigers option is still live. If Smith was retiring, he would have done it already. This delay is a ruse to get Grant and B Smith comfortable with the idea. I would prefer Harry over both Smiths at 9.
The bulldogs have signed a hooker from Melbourne for 2022 fingers crossed it’s not Grant
@insideman said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1269328) said:Bullgrubs have signed a Melbourne hooker for 2022
@insideman said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1269327) said:@twentyforty said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1267572) said:I think the Grant to Tigers option is still live. If Smith was retiring, he would have done it already. This delay is a ruse to get Grant and B Smith comfortable with the idea. I would prefer Harry over both Smiths at 9.
The bulldogs have signed a hooker from Melbourne for 2022 fingers crossed it’s not Grant
@avocadoontoast said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1267649) said:@Russell said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1267625) said:Neither but would take Munster in a flash.
you don't want Harry Grant or JAC? Why? They'd be our two best players (by a considerable margin)
@insideman said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1269328) said:Bullgrubs have signed a Melbourne hooker for 2022
@balmain-boy said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1269486) said:@insideman said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1269328) said:Bullgrubs have signed a Melbourne hooker for 2022
Someone from Jersey flegg most likely then. Dogs are a rabble and neither Smith or Grant are free to negotiate with anyone at this stage.
Dogs fans can barely read. Don't know why people take any sense in what they say
@balmain-boy said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1269486) said:@insideman said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1269328) said:Bullgrubs have signed a Melbourne hooker for 2022
Someone from Jersey flegg most likely then. Dogs are a rabble and neither Smith or Grant are free to negotiate with anyone at this stage.
Dogs fans can barely read. Don't know why people take any sense in what they say
@insideman said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1269584) said:@balmain-boy said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1269486) said:@insideman said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1269328) said:Bullgrubs have signed a Melbourne hooker for 2022
Someone from Jersey flegg most likely then. Dogs are a rabble and neither Smith or Grant are free to negotiate with anyone at this stage.
Dogs fans can barely read. Don't know why people take any sense in what they say
They have signed one of the two. They are allowed to negotiate from November 1. I don’t know who it is but it’s grant or Brendan smith
@balmain-boy said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1269639) said:@insideman said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1269584) said:@balmain-boy said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1269486) said:@insideman said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1269328) said:Bullgrubs have signed a Melbourne hooker for 2022
Someone from Jersey flegg most likely then. Dogs are a rabble and neither Smith or Grant are free to negotiate with anyone at this stage.
Dogs fans can barely read. Don't know why people take any sense in what they say
They have signed one of the two. They are allowed to negotiate from November 1. I don’t know who it is but it’s grant or Brendan smith
Incorrect. Both players at Under contract on long term deals and all clubs are unable to officially negotiate, at least until Can makes up his mind
@insideman said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1270662) said:@balmain-boy said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1269639) said:@insideman said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1269584) said:@balmain-boy said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1269486) said:@insideman said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1269328) said:Bullgrubs have signed a Melbourne hooker for 2022
Someone from Jersey flegg most likely then. Dogs are a rabble and neither Smith or Grant are free to negotiate with anyone at this stage.
Dogs fans can barely read. Don't know why people take any sense in what they say
They have signed one of the two. They are allowed to negotiate from November 1. I don’t know who it is but it’s grant or Brendan smith
Incorrect. Both players at Under contract on long term deals and all clubs are unable to officially negotiate, at least until Can makes up his mind
Trust me they have signed one of the 2
@insideman said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1270662) said:@balmain-boy said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1269639) said:@insideman said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1269584) said:@balmain-boy said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1269486) said:@insideman said in [Harry or JAC for 2022?](/post/1269328) said:Bullgrubs have signed a Melbourne hooker for 2022
Someone from Jersey flegg most likely then. Dogs are a rabble and neither Smith or Grant are free to negotiate with anyone at this stage.
Dogs fans can barely read. Don't know why people take any sense in what they say
They have signed one of the two. They are allowed to negotiate from November 1. I don’t know who it is but it’s grant or Brendan smith
Incorrect. Both players at Under contract on long term deals and all clubs are unable to officially negotiate, at least until Can makes up his mind
Trust me they have signed one of the 2