HBG Directors give themselves Pay rise

It’s been dubbed ‘the most chaotic board in NSW’. But Wests Tigers’ owners are pushing for a pay rise

By Chris Barrett

March 7, 2026 — 4.21pm
Wests Tigers’ owners are bidding to give themselves a pay rise three months after a shambolic episode in which they sacked chairman Barry O’Farrell and three other directors before backflipping at the behest of the NRL.

The Holman Barnes Group, which owns 90 per cent of the Tigers and holds the licence for the NRL team, has for the past year been embroiled in turmoil that has threatened to spill over into the football club.

Now, its board members are seeking a boost which would see them collect more than their counterparts at most other Sydney clubs with ties to NRL teams.

HBG is proposing that its chairman’s annual honorarium be lifted from $51,341 to $65,000, the deputy chair’s fee to be raised from $33,371 to $50,000, and all other directors to get $32,500 instead of $25,670. All would also receive an extra $5000 if they sit on a club committee.

The effective $70,000 payment per annum for the chairman would eclipse the amounts paid to those in charge at most of Sydney’s major NRL-affiliated leagues clubs, including those with much larger membership bases.

Parramatta Leagues Club, which owns the Eels and has 65,000 members, gives its president $30,000 a year and other directors $20,000.

The 60,000-member Canterbury League Club, which is strongly linked to the Bulldogs and backs them financially, allows for a total of $229,801 to be paid to its seven directors including the chairman – an average of $32,828, although the chair and deputy chair receive a greater share.

St George Leagues Club, which owns 50 per cent of the Dragons and has 25,000 members, hands its chair $16,000 a year and ordinary directors $12,000, plus $2000 for each committee they sit on.

HBG has 27,000 members and the proposed honoraria for its board are exceeded only by those at Penrith NRL team owners Panthers Group, where total revenue was nearly $180 million in 2025 and which has a membership base of 148,000. The Panthers’ chairman receives $80,000 a year, its two deputies get $40,000 each and the remaining directors pick up $20,000 per annum.

Like those at other clubs, the HBG board members can take advantage of other perks of the position such as food and drinks. At the club’s annual general meeting on March 21 members will also be asked to approve its chairman and deputy receiving $500 per month hospitality cards.

As Holman Barnes Group’s business has expanded, the workload and governance responsibilities placed on directors have increased substantially,” said HBG vice-chairman Frank Primerano, who also sits on the Wests Tigers board.

“The proposed adjustments simply bring board honorariums into line with the scale of the organisation and the time commitment required, particularly as directors are increasingly involved in committees and strategic projects during this period of significant growth and investment.”

A source familiar with the activities of HBG, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said: “How can the most chaotic board in NSW simultaneously become one of the highest paid?

“If the stipend for the board were based on performance then quite obviously these people would be getting a pay cut, not a pay day.”

HBG, which oversees venues including Wests Ashfield, returned a net profit of $11.9 million in 2025 after raking in $52 million from poker machines and recording overall revenue of $100 million, according to its annual report.

But the organisation has been plagued by dysfunction during the past 18 months, with several board members controversially removed and former NSW premier O’Farrell and three other independent directors then sensationally axed from the Tigers last December less than a year after they were installed following a governance review.

After concerns were raised by the NRL, HBG reinstated them days later and O’Farrell was Tigers chairman. But the club was forced into a costly payout to Tigers chief executive Shane Richardson, who resigned amid the boardroom chaos 18 months into a four-year contract, and settled out of court with former HBG director Rick Wayde, a key instigator of the Tigers review, after he was banned for eight years.

HBG, which owns the NRL team via its control of Wests Magpies, has since beefed up its representation on the Tigers board, giving it an effective majority.

While the Tigers are governed separately to their owners, NRL funding for the team flows through HBG.

According to its latest financial report, HBG received $20 million from the NRL in 2025 and owes $36 million to players and head coach Benji Marshall over the next five years.

HBG is unusual in that the balance of power lies with 20 so-called debenture holders, who choose the majority of its directors under a decades-old, undemocratic system.

Only two of nine board seats are directly elected by the wider membership and there will not be a ballot for those spots at this month’s AGM after one of the three nominations withdrew.

The two remaining are well known to HBG board members: Shannon Cavanagh, a director of Wests Magpies alongside HBG chairman Dennis Burgess and Primerano, and Aldo Di Mento, a director of APIA Leichardt FC – the inner-west soccer team in which HGB bought a stake last year and on whose board Primerano and HBG chief executive Daniel Paton also sit.
 
Posted about an hour agoView attachment 35008
“The more they criticise us the more unified we become”
It’s an interesting concept but it hasn’t been playing out that way. This unification seems to follow criticism of performance and undesirable outcomes. As such the unified group becomes more defensive which produces more of the same. The group needs a new and stronger leadership.
 
“The more they criticise us the more unified we become”
It’s an interesting concept but it hasn’t been playing out that way. This unification seems to follow criticism of performance and undesirable outcomes. As such the unified group becomes more defensive which produces more of the same. The group needs a new and stronger leadership.
Any good leader they get, they pushed straight back out, because good leaders want to evolve, these guys dont.

Until they lose pokie revenue, nothing will ever change. But the day it happens, they will be a deer in headlights. One can only hope.
 

It’s been dubbed ‘the most chaotic board in NSW’. But Wests Tigers’ owners are pushing for a pay rise

By Chris Barrett

March 7, 2026 — 4.21pm
Wests Tigers’ owners are bidding to give themselves a pay rise three months after a shambolic episode in which they sacked chairman Barry O’Farrell and three other directors before backflipping at the behest of the NRL.

The Holman Barnes Group, which owns 90 per cent of the Tigers and holds the licence for the NRL team, has for the past year been embroiled in turmoil that has threatened to spill over into the football club.

Now, its board members are seeking a boost which would see them collect more than their counterparts at most other Sydney clubs with ties to NRL teams.

HBG is proposing that its chairman’s annual honorarium be lifted from $51,341 to $65,000, the deputy chair’s fee to be raised from $33,371 to $50,000, and all other directors to get $32,500 instead of $25,670. All would also receive an extra $5000 if they sit on a club committee.

The effective $70,000 payment per annum for the chairman would eclipse the amounts paid to those in charge at most of Sydney’s major NRL-affiliated leagues clubs, including those with much larger membership bases.

Parramatta Leagues Club, which owns the Eels and has 65,000 members, gives its president $30,000 a year and other directors $20,000.

The 60,000-member Canterbury League Club, which is strongly linked to the Bulldogs and backs them financially, allows for a total of $229,801 to be paid to its seven directors including the chairman – an average of $32,828, although the chair and deputy chair receive a greater share.

St George Leagues Club, which owns 50 per cent of the Dragons and has 25,000 members, hands its chair $16,000 a year and ordinary directors $12,000, plus $2000 for each committee they sit on.

HBG has 27,000 members and the proposed honoraria for its board are exceeded only by those at Penrith NRL team owners Panthers Group, where total revenue was nearly $180 million in 2025 and which has a membership base of 148,000. The Panthers’ chairman receives $80,000 a year, its two deputies get $40,000 each and the remaining directors pick up $20,000 per annum.

Like those at other clubs, the HBG board members can take advantage of other perks of the position such as food and drinks. At the club’s annual general meeting on March 21 members will also be asked to approve its chairman and deputy receiving $500 per month hospitality cards.

As Holman Barnes Group’s business has expanded, the workload and governance responsibilities placed on directors have increased substantially,” said HBG vice-chairman Frank Primerano, who also sits on the Wests Tigers board.

“The proposed adjustments simply bring board honorariums into line with the scale of the organisation and the time commitment required, particularly as directors are increasingly involved in committees and strategic projects during this period of significant growth and investment.”

A source familiar with the activities of HBG, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said: “How can the most chaotic board in NSW simultaneously become one of the highest paid?

“If the stipend for the board were based on performance then quite obviously these people would be getting a pay cut, not a pay day.”

HBG, which oversees venues including Wests Ashfield, returned a net profit of $11.9 million in 2025 after raking in $52 million from poker machines and recording overall revenue of $100 million, according to its annual report.

But the organisation has been plagued by dysfunction during the past 18 months, with several board members controversially removed and former NSW premier O’Farrell and three other independent directors then sensationally axed from the Tigers last December less than a year after they were installed following a governance review.

After concerns were raised by the NRL, HBG reinstated them days later and O’Farrell was Tigers chairman. But the club was forced into a costly payout to Tigers chief executive Shane Richardson, who resigned amid the boardroom chaos 18 months into a four-year contract, and settled out of court with former HBG director Rick Wayde, a key instigator of the Tigers review, after he was banned for eight years.

HBG, which owns the NRL team via its control of Wests Magpies, has since beefed up its representation on the Tigers board, giving it an effective majority.

While the Tigers are governed separately to their owners, NRL funding for the team flows through HBG.

According to its latest financial report, HBG received $20 million from the NRL in 2025 and owes $36 million to players and head coach Benji Marshall over the next five years.

HBG is unusual in that the balance of power lies with 20 so-called debenture holders, who choose the majority of its directors under a decades-old, undemocratic system.

Only two of nine board seats are directly elected by the wider membership and there will not be a ballot for those spots at this month’s AGM after one of the three nominations withdrew.

The two remaining are well known to HBG board members: Shannon Cavanagh, a director of Wests Magpies alongside HBG chairman Dennis Burgess and Primerano, and Aldo Di Mento, a director of APIA Leichardt FC – the inner-west soccer team in which HGB bought a stake last year and on whose board Primerano and HBG chief executive Daniel Paton also sit.
These guys could easily be running the country. Showing the exact same arrogance and complacency as our current political leaders.
 
So I just realised that Wests Ashfield who owns HBG who owns 90% of Wests Tigers all 3 boards have the same 7 board members plus a few extras. Have I got this right?
 
Why ?
As far as I can see they are both very supportive of Wests Tigers rugby league team and very positive on our chances of having a very successful season in 2026.
Going off Alan Fallah’s social media accounts he only has eyes for the Magpie’s and is a disruptive force against the Wests Tigers.
 
Going off Alan Fallah’s social media accounts he only has eyes for the Magpie’s and is a disruptive force against the Wests Tigers.
I don’t follow everything he says or does and I’ve only met him briefly a couple of times, but my understanding is he likes nothing better than seeing players progressing through the Wests Magpies to Wests Tigers and being successful.
 
Last edited:
As it has often been pointed out on the other HBG thread- Wests Tigers (that's us fans) are not the same as Wests Ashfield & definitely not the same as HBG.

This pay-rise is at HBG level.

For HBG aligned performance.

How did HBG fare in 2025? That should really be the only deciding factor in their pay rise debate.

If HBG performed at or above their expected rate- who are Wests Tigers fans to complain?

It's not a Wests Tigers board pay increase.

This is a non-issue for Wests Tigers & more an opportunity for people to throw insults on a forum.
 
Bug is just a supporter... no official capacity
AF has a clear and obvious disdain for WTs and it's suppporters...and as a board member thats a worry
Fallah's 'rant' seems more like a personal defence of HBG & their actions than anything else. I don't know him, but I know some people that do- and they all say he's a very reasonable guy.

While what Fallah says doesn't resonate well with the pitchfork folk of December, it was really just a fairly passionate plea/defence of the group he is involved with- HBG- and what he feels is disrespect from fans- at least, that's how I read it.

Some of the stuff thrown AT HBG was just as passionate.
 
On don’t follow everything he says or does and I’ve only met him briefly a couple of times, but my understanding is he likes nothing better than seeing players progressing through the Wests Magpies to Wests Tigers and being successful.
I’m sure he does and thats a good thing. I’m also glad he has so much passion for the Wests Magpies. You need people like that in pathways. What I don’t like is the division and instability at the governess level and his comments on social media are adding to this.
 
As it has often been pointed out on the other HBG thread- Wests Tigers (that's us fans) are not the same as Wests Ashfield & definitely not the same as HBG.

This pay-rise is at HBG level.

For HBG aligned performance.

How did HBG fare in 2025? That should really be the only deciding factor in their pay rise debate.

If HBG performed at or above their expected rate- who are Wests Tigers fans to complain?

It's not a Wests Tigers board pay increase.

This is a non-issue for Wests Tigers & more an opportunity for people to throw insults on a forum.
You can spray as much air freshener over it as you like but it still stinks, the timing alone to do it is so bad when everything is still raw hence the criticism in the media.

Hopefully it has to be voted on and it has a pathetically low approval vote.
 
You can spray as much air freshener over it as you like but it still stinks, the timing alone to do it is so bad when everything is still raw hence the criticism in the media.

Hopefully it has to be voted on and it has a pathetically low approval vote.
Like I said- this has ZERO impact on Wests Tigers & fan fury is misguided.

This is a media attempt to get buy-in from a rabid fan pack. You WANT to be angry at HBG- so the paper found something irrelevant to stir you up. Pay rise or pay decrease for HBG board members will have zero impact on Wests Tigers is will completely be based on HBG performance in 2025.

If the overall results in 2025 for HBG aligned organisations were positive- it would make sense that a pay increase would happen.
 
Back
Top