HBG Directors give themselves Pay rise

It’s been dubbed ‘the most chaotic board in NSW’. But Wests Tigers’ owners are pushing for a pay rise

By Chris Barrett

March 7, 2026 — 4.21pm
Wests Tigers’ owners are bidding to give themselves a pay rise three months after a shambolic episode in which they sacked chairman Barry O’Farrell and three other directors before backflipping at the behest of the NRL.

The Holman Barnes Group, which owns 90 per cent of the Tigers and holds the licence for the NRL team, has for the past year been embroiled in turmoil that has threatened to spill over into the football club.

Now, its board members are seeking a boost which would see them collect more than their counterparts at most other Sydney clubs with ties to NRL teams.

HBG is proposing that its chairman’s annual honorarium be lifted from $51,341 to $65,000, the deputy chair’s fee to be raised from $33,371 to $50,000, and all other directors to get $32,500 instead of $25,670. All would also receive an extra $5000 if they sit on a club committee.

The effective $70,000 payment per annum for the chairman would eclipse the amounts paid to those in charge at most of Sydney’s major NRL-affiliated leagues clubs, including those with much larger membership bases.

Parramatta Leagues Club, which owns the Eels and has 65,000 members, gives its president $30,000 a year and other directors $20,000.

The 60,000-member Canterbury League Club, which is strongly linked to the Bulldogs and backs them financially, allows for a total of $229,801 to be paid to its seven directors including the chairman – an average of $32,828, although the chair and deputy chair receive a greater share.

St George Leagues Club, which owns 50 per cent of the Dragons and has 25,000 members, hands its chair $16,000 a year and ordinary directors $12,000, plus $2000 for each committee they sit on.

HBG has 27,000 members and the proposed honoraria for its board are exceeded only by those at Penrith NRL team owners Panthers Group, where total revenue was nearly $180 million in 2025 and which has a membership base of 148,000. The Panthers’ chairman receives $80,000 a year, its two deputies get $40,000 each and the remaining directors pick up $20,000 per annum.

Like those at other clubs, the HBG board members can take advantage of other perks of the position such as food and drinks. At the club’s annual general meeting on March 21 members will also be asked to approve its chairman and deputy receiving $500 per month hospitality cards.

As Holman Barnes Group’s business has expanded, the workload and governance responsibilities placed on directors have increased substantially,” said HBG vice-chairman Frank Primerano, who also sits on the Wests Tigers board.

“The proposed adjustments simply bring board honorariums into line with the scale of the organisation and the time commitment required, particularly as directors are increasingly involved in committees and strategic projects during this period of significant growth and investment.”

A source familiar with the activities of HBG, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said: “How can the most chaotic board in NSW simultaneously become one of the highest paid?

“If the stipend for the board were based on performance then quite obviously these people would be getting a pay cut, not a pay day.”

HBG, which oversees venues including Wests Ashfield, returned a net profit of $11.9 million in 2025 after raking in $52 million from poker machines and recording overall revenue of $100 million, according to its annual report.

But the organisation has been plagued by dysfunction during the past 18 months, with several board members controversially removed and former NSW premier O’Farrell and three other independent directors then sensationally axed from the Tigers last December less than a year after they were installed following a governance review.

After concerns were raised by the NRL, HBG reinstated them days later and O’Farrell was Tigers chairman. But the club was forced into a costly payout to Tigers chief executive Shane Richardson, who resigned amid the boardroom chaos 18 months into a four-year contract, and settled out of court with former HBG director Rick Wayde, a key instigator of the Tigers review, after he was banned for eight years.

HBG, which owns the NRL team via its control of Wests Magpies, has since beefed up its representation on the Tigers board, giving it an effective majority.

While the Tigers are governed separately to their owners, NRL funding for the team flows through HBG.

According to its latest financial report, HBG received $20 million from the NRL in 2025 and owes $36 million to players and head coach Benji Marshall over the next five years.

HBG is unusual in that the balance of power lies with 20 so-called debenture holders, who choose the majority of its directors under a decades-old, undemocratic system.

Only two of nine board seats are directly elected by the wider membership and there will not be a ballot for those spots at this month’s AGM after one of the three nominations withdrew.

The two remaining are well known to HBG board members: Shannon Cavanagh, a director of Wests Magpies alongside HBG chairman Dennis Burgess and Primerano, and Aldo Di Mento, a director of APIA Leichardt FC – the inner-west soccer team in which HGB bought a stake last year and on whose board Primerano and HBG chief executive Daniel Paton also sit.
 
Here ya go...

Profitability & Debt Elimination: Richardson revealed in late 2025 that the club had moved from a $5.5 million loss over the previous two fiscal years to a reported profit. He successfully cleared the club's existing debts, leaving "money in the bank" for future investment.

Commercial Growth: Under his leadership, key revenue streams saw unprecedented year-on-year growth:
Sponsorship: Increased by approximately 30–40%, including securing blue-chip partners like Pepper Money.

Membership: Surged by 27–40%, a significant feat following years of poor on-field performance.

Corporate Hospitality: Witnessed a 51% increase as the club professionalized its game-day offerings.

Stadium Strategy & Infrastructure: He secured a landmark 15-year stadium strategy. This included obtaining $110 million in government funding for the redevelopment of Leichhardt Oval and Campbelltown Sports Stadium, ensuring the club remained in its traditional "heartlands" while gaining access to modern facilities.
On-Field Improvement: While not reaching the finals, the team jumped from 17th to 13th in 2025, winning 9 games. This relative success stabilized the "product" on the field, leading to a 45% increase in crowd attendance.

Key Responsibilities
Shane Richardson was brought in specifically as a "fixer" to implement the findings of the independent Crawford-Barnier review. His primary responsibilities included:

- Governance Overhaul: Dissolving the old board structure and implementing a new, independent board of directors to remove factionalism and political infighting.

- Strategic Planning: Authoring and locking in a Club Strategic Plan through 2028, covering all departments from football operations to commercial sales.

- Roster & Salary Cap Management: Overseeing a "clean out" of the roster. He was responsible for the strategic recruitment of marquee players like Jarome Luai and managing the delicate balance between high-profile signings and promoting local talent from the Western Sydney nursery.

- Pathways & Community: Expanding the Empower program, which embedded the club into 60 local schools. He prioritized the "long game" by ensuring local juniors saw a clear path to the NRL, reducing the likelihood of losing stars to rival clubs.

- Coaching Support: Acting as a mentor and shield for rookie head coach Benji Marshall, allowing Marshall to focus on football while Richardson handled the media and corporate pressures.

----

So now please tell us about the initiatives and growth HBG are responsible for...
Reads great. And Richo was definitely a big driver in all that.

You're asking me to give an exact break down of HBG involvement, by giving an overall result of Wests Tigers- how about 100%?

They hired Richo, yeah?

Richo performed his job. He did as expected.

Probably exceeded in some areas.

If a GM hires a CEO, and the company goes gangbusters due to the CEO's incentives, does the GM's wage increase based on profits & increased tasks through expanding? Sure it does.

I assume if the CEO was still at the club, he could be in line for a performance increase too.

You're arguing for the direct impact of guys sitting above the CEO.

If all their business's went south- I would 100% agree a pay increase at their board level would be bad. But then, it would ALSO be a HBG problem- not a Wests Tigers problem.
 
Because the football club has been under supported for so long and the football club is very, very important.

Well thats what Parra, Dogs, Souths, Roosters etc think.

HBG should have the same mindset, board members should be last on the pecking order, its the fricken Pokies that do all the work, anyway.
You think I'm debating how good HBG are.

I'm just saying- pay increases at the HBG board level are going to have negligible impact on Wests Tigers- and are really not worth getting worked up about.
 
Why not both?

I'm saying- in any company, if it performs & you get new tasks added- you get compensated for it.

So long as they are not sinking ALL the profit into board wages- that seems fair.
So what do you do when they're not performing? By that logic, they should have had a pay decrease
 
Sure.. so ill ask again.. please provide the details of their results so we can assess their input into the results (as opposed to the results being largely driven by poker machine revenue).
Do they fund the club where poker machines are generating wealth?
 
Reads great. And Richo was definitely a big driver in all that.

You're asking me to give an exact break down of HBG involvement, by giving an overall result of Wests Tigers- how about 100%?

They hired Richo, yeah?

Richo performed his job. He did as expected.

Probably exceeded in some areas.

If a GM hires a CEO, and the company goes gangbusters due to the CEO's incentives, does the GM's wage increase based on profits & increased tasks through expanding? Sure it does.

I assume if the CEO was still at the club, he could be in line for a performance increase too.

You're arguing for the direct impact of guys sitting above the CEO.

If all their business's went south- I would 100% agree a pay increase at their board level would be bad. But then, it would ALSO be a HBG problem- not a Wests Tigers problem.
Alot of words, no answers.

I dont need every single little detail, but give us something....

List a few initiatives..
List some of the increases in profit

Surely you have something?
 
Reads great. And Richo was definitely a big driver in all that.

You're asking me to give an exact break down of HBG involvement, by giving an overall result of Wests Tigers- how about 100%?

They hired Richo, yeah?

Richo performed his job. He did as expected.

Probably exceeded in some areas.

If a GM hires a CEO, and the company goes gangbusters due to the CEO's incentives, does the GM's wage increase based on profits & increased tasks through expanding? Sure it does.

I assume if the CEO was still at the club, he could be in line for a performance increase too.

You're arguing for the direct impact of guys sitting above the CEO.

If all their business's went south- I would 100% agree a pay increase at their board level would be bad. But then, it would ALSO be a HBG problem- not a Wests Tigers problem.
But he didn’t get a pay increase. He got pushed out the door by the same people wanting more money. You assume a lot but the reality is opposite.
 
So what do you do when they're not performing? By that logic, they should have had a pay decrease
Agree!

However, in the real world- no management decreases their wage.

People are against HBG doing what every company in the world does. Start a new thread- "Should Management Get Pay Increases Based on Employee Lead Work Results"
 
Deflecting again.
Im asking you where they have introduced value add initiatives that have contributed to growth and success.
Why is it so hard?
Pretty sure I've said numerous times I don't have access to their financials.

And it's not deflecting- if they fund the operation where pokies are making money for the club- wouldn't their involvement be 100% if not at least 'substantial'? I take it, if it fails, it's HBG's finances that take a hit?
 
Agree!

However, in the real world- no management decreases their wage.

People are against HBG doing what every company in the world does. Start a new thread- "Should Management Get Pay Increases Based on Employee Lead Work Results"
HBG arent like every other company in the world, they operate using an outdated debenture system with no accountability. Its a protection racket.

If they operated like every other business, then id accept your position.
 
But he didn’t get a pay increase. He got pushed out the door by the same people wanting more money. You assume a lot but the reality is opposite.
He resigned.

What he may, or may not, have been paid had he stayed is all conjecture.

He did not have to resign.
 
HBG arent like every other company in the world, they operate using an outdated debenture system with no accountability. Its a protection racket.

If they operated like every other business, then id accept your position.
But they still operate as a business? Not every company is run the same way. That theirs's is unique doesn't stop the fact they operate as a business.
 
He already answered that...with a question
Classic, if you dont wanna.answer...ask a question or sidestep it.altogether
Dont waste your time with these guys
Let me remove the question-

"Why not both?

I'm saying- in any company, if it performs & you get new tasks added- you get compensated for it.

So long as they are not sinking ALL the profit into board wages- that seems fair."

BOTH
 
Back
Top