HBG, Independent Directors Sacked

This is a good post hammertime 👍, full of genuine heartfelt emotion, and makes me wish I was more articulate to get my words out as good as you've done.
So, all I can do is say it the way I see it.

We all wish both sides of the JV were more united to be winning under the one Wests Tigers banner.

But...I hate to say this, the tail of the tiger has been trying to wag the 90% of the body of the tiger, and that very seldom happens.

Imo, HBG debenture holders are NOT the issue with a shared vision.

The HBG debenture holders and others ARE running us with that shared vision, but they want to stay in control of things and run it their way, which I am pretty sure they are entitled to do.

I'm guessing, the 4 board members that were sacked, as well as Richo, were NOT co-operating in a way the owners wanted them to.

So, the reaction from the Balmain side to the 4 board members being sacked with a possibility of 4 Magpies replacing them is 'let's get rid of the debenture holders in any way possible', 'so we can move on to a "democratic accountable structure''...and...how do we do that...we flood WESTS with people from the Balmain side of the JV and take control.

Then, if any people from the Magpies side dare to complain their told "you're not part of the team".

And I hate to say it, that is happening already. I've been called all sorts of rude names, possibly in an attempt to break my will.
But I will not bend, AND NEITHER WILL THE DEBENTURE HOLDERS as far as I can see.

The march on Saturday from Pratten Park to Wests Leagues club to demonstrate, could well be the start of another war

I hope this hasn't sounded aggressive.
If it does all I can do is apologise in advance, as I had no intention of it sounding that way.

None of what I have written is fantasy on my part as it's all been written in earlier posts on here.
What Magpies going to war with Wests Tigers supporters showing there disgust for their actions, what a load of rubbish, your mob have been dealt with by the NRL by the looks of things, muzzled for good reason get used to it.
 
This is a good post hammertime 👍, full of genuine heartfelt emotion, and makes me wish I was more articulate to get my words out as good as you've done.
So, all I can do is say it the way I see it.

We all wish both sides of the JV were more united to be winning under the one Wests Tigers banner.

But...I hate to say this, the tail of the tiger has been trying to wag the 90% of the body of the tiger, and that very seldom happens.

Imo, HBG debenture holders are NOT the issue with a shared vision.

The HBG debenture holders and others ARE running us with that shared vision, but they want to stay in control of things and run it their way, which I am pretty sure they are entitled to do.

I'm guessing, the 4 board members that were sacked, as well as Richo, were NOT co-operating in a way the owners wanted them to.

So, the reaction from the Balmain side to the 4 board members being sacked with a possibility of 4 Magpies replacing them is 'let's get rid of the debenture holders in any way possible', 'so we can move on to a "democratic accountable structure''...and...how do we do that...we flood WESTS with people from the Balmain side of the JV and take control.

Then, if any people from the Magpies side dare to complain their told "you're not part of the team".

And I hate to say it, that is happening already. I've been called all sorts of rude names, possibly in an attempt to break my will.
But I will not bend, AND NEITHER WILL THE DEBENTURE HOLDERS as far as I can see.

The march on Saturday from Pratten Park to Wests Leagues club to demonstrate, could well be the start of another war

I hope this hasn't sounded aggressive.
If it does all I can do is apologise in advance, as I had no intention of it sounding that way.

None of what I have written is fantasy on my part as it's all been written in earlier posts on here.
What you again fail to understand is the majority aren't Balmain people, Balmain are not the solution, they are part of the problem.

We are Wests Tigers people, we love the Wests part of our name. The debenture holders due not own the Wests Tigers, the hbg directors do not own the Wests Tigers, they are custodians only and have failed in that role.
 
Not sure
We need someone who controls play and doesn’t lose their head like Luai does in scoring opportunities.
Maybe he can learn to do this….
Latu still seems a bit unsure of himself.

Doueihi...it's like he loves being written off. Every time we think he's done, he pulls out match winners. I'm throwing it to him first based on the back end of last year.
 
Fair enough, but as others have said, wait and see what happens before jumping to the extreme negatives.
Winning games is what counts. The owners don’t matter. As long as the squad train hard and prepare well they’ll go alright this year despite all this stupid nonsense.
You’re putting the horse after the cart imo, but I’m happy to drop it.
 
Latu still seems a bit unsure of himself.

Doueihi...it's like he loves being written off. Every time we think he's done, he pulls out match winners. I'm throwing it to him first based on the back end of last year.
He was warming to the task before he put his head in front of a bulldozer, F me that's a couple of posts about footy instead of politics things must be getting better.
 
This is a good post hammertime 👍, full of genuine heartfelt emotion, and makes me wish I was more articulate to get my words out as good as you've done.
So, all I can do is say it the way I see it.

We all wish both sides of the JV were more united to be winning under the one Wests Tigers banner.

But...I hate to say this, the tail of the tiger has been trying to wag the 90% of the body of the tiger, and that very seldom happens.

Imo, HBG debenture holders are NOT the issue with a shared vision.

The HBG debenture holders and others ARE running us with that shared vision, but they want to stay in control of things and run it their way, which I am pretty sure they are entitled to do.

I'm guessing, the 4 board members that were sacked, as well as Richo, were NOT co-operating in a way the owners wanted them to.

So, the reaction from the Balmain side to the 4 board members being sacked with a possibility of 4 Magpies replacing them is 'let's get rid of the debenture holders in any way possible', 'so we can move on to a "democratic accountable structure''...and...how do we do that...we flood WESTS with people from the Balmain side of the JV and take control.

Then, if any people from the Magpies side dare to complain their told "you're not part of the team".

And I hate to say it, that is happening already. I've been called all sorts of rude names, possibly in an attempt to break my will.
But I will not bend, AND NEITHER WILL THE DEBENTURE HOLDERS as far as I can see.

The march on Saturday from Pratten Park to Wests Leagues club to demonstrate, could well be the start of another war

I hope this hasn't sounded aggressive.
If it does all I can do is apologise in advance, as I had no intention of it sounding that way.

None of what I have written is fantasy on my part as it's all been written in earlier posts on here.
Wherever you got that from is rubbish.
 
I'd like to hear from Chad 🇹🇩

@The Chad
What's your take on all this?
I'll do this in point form so that people can pick me apart individually.

If Barry O'Farrell is the best choice- that's fantastic news.

It's interesting that O'Farrell would agree to work with HBG again. It would seem unlikely he would do it under duress. Maybe some home truths were meshed out between the two parties?

Nothing changes my stance that people are reacting like they 'know' more than they actually do. Even now- there's been 3 or 4 theories being treated as fact.

None of the things I've said about HBG have changed.

None of the things I've said about how I want the club to be have changed.

People trying to take shots at me...hasn't changed. 😀

And I still don't know anything- other than how to cut & paste now.
 
Back
Top