HBG, Independent Directors Sacked

[weststigers]

I think we all know it’s highly likely it was all a ploy to upset Richo.
My theory is they stupidly thought it would not cause too much commotion sacking the board members and knew it would ultimately remove Richo who was the one they wanted out.
I assume they were also not aware Richo could move on and collect 1.5 million in the process.
It’s not even a secret that Enriched was receiving payments from Wests Tigers.
Even if they were done at a fair and reasonable cost and not a largely inflated cost which had been strongly suggested, you just wouldn’t do it due to a conflict of interest.

Hmmm. They sound even more fish brained if your version is to be believed.

They hate Richo and want him gone, so they blow up the board in order to force Richo to resign. Great plan...but what if Richo didn't resign?

Their other option would be to just sack Richo...I know which one would have caused less drama and both would have cost 1.5 million in a payout.

How did you come to this conclusion?

 

[cochise]

I think we all know it’s highly likely it was all a ploy to upset Richo.
My theory is they stupidly thought it would not cause too much commotion sacking the board members and knew it would ultimately remove Richo who was the one they wanted out.
I assume they were also not aware Richo could move on and collect 1.5 million in the process.
It’s not even a secret that Enriched was receiving payments from Wests Tigers.
Even if they were done at a fair and reasonable cost and not a largely inflated cost which had been strongly suggested, you just wouldn’t do it due to a conflict of interest.

To be honest I'm not relying on HBG fed narratives, they just had to settle with Rick Wayde over his removal. They then had to remove the video announcing the removal of the independents and then reappoint them. Seems HBG aren't very reliable with their reasoning.

Ill base my position and actions on their history.

 

[Vicious]

Hmmm. They sound even more fish brained if your version is to be believed.

They hate Richo and want him gone, so they blow up the board in order to force Richo to resign. Great plan...but what if Richo didn't resign?

Their other option would be to just sack Richo...I know which one would have caused less drama and both would have cost 1.5 million in a payout.

How did you come to this conclusion?

I reckon they thought removing Richo would cause uproar, but didn’t realise how much uproar removing the directors would cause.

 

[cochise]

I reckon they thought removing Richo would cause uproar, but didn’t realise how much uproar removing the directors would cause.

So who's fault is that?

 

[weststigers]

I reckon they thought removing Richo would cause uproar, but didn’t realise how much uproar removing the directors would cause.

You're a funny bloke.

 

[weststigers]

So who's fault is that?

Put all this energy into a podcast. Get that Bechara lunatic back on and Adel. 5 hour pre-christmas marathon.

I'm bored of engaging and reading the circular arguments with the fish brains.

 

[Craegus]

Put all this energy into a podcast. Get that Bechara lunatic back on and Adel. 5 hour pre-christmas marathon.

I'm bored of engaging and reading the circular arguments with the fish brains.

It is amazing that it was a simple question to a response of your own, and yet you cannot answer the question and have to go back to that sort of post.

Just proves that you don't have a solid argument, one that can actually stand up with evidence.

 

[Vicious]

Put all this energy into a podcast. Get that Bechara lunatic back on and Adel. 5 hour pre-christmas marathon.

I'm bored of engaging and reading the circular arguments with the fish brains.

Yes can we get Adel to elaborate on his dealings with Richo please ?

 

[weststigers]

It is amazing that it was a simple question to a response of your own, and yet you cannot answer the question and have to go back to that sort of post.

Just proves that you don't have a solid argument, one that can actually stand up with evidence.

Huh? Explain please

 

[cochise]

Huh? Explain please

I think he quoted the wrong post

 

[Vicious]

So who's fault is that?

HBG’s fault, but contributed to by things done that not done with integrity and then further fueled by not wanting to compromise on certain topics such as Wests Magpies remaining as the feeder team.

 

[Craegus]

Huh? Explain please

Oh no, I did quote the right post.

Huh? Explain please

Cochise asked you who's fault it was that it was going to cause an uproar, and you failed to answer it as that answer clearly would have been HBG which you don't want to lay complete blame on, despite in this case, and basically all of the cases it being 100% their fault. Instead you went with the personal attack to deflect from the answer.

 

[weststigers]

Oh no, I did quote the right post.


Cochise asked you who's fault it was that it was going to cause an uproar, and you failed to answer it as that answer clearly would have been HBG which you don't want to lay complete blame on, despite in this case, and basically all of the cases it being 100% their fault. Instead you went with the personal attack to deflect from the answer.

My friend. I'll spare you a bollocking, because I am sure you have made an honest error.

Please the go and read the last 10 to 15 posts I have made and I'll sit here quietly waiting for your apology.

 

[Craegus]

My friend. I'll spare you a bollocking, because I am sure you have made an honest error.

Please the go and read the last 10 to 15 posts I have made and I'll sit here quietly waiting for your apology.

Ok yes, I do actually apologise fully, too many attacks on people for the purpose of just causing drama in here all bleeds into one after a while. Yours just happened to read like it in the moment.

Happy to go along that you are in agreement with those who are blaming HBG for the problems at the moment.

 

[Dr_Ice]

I think we all know it’s highly likely it was all a ploy to upset Richo.
My theory is they stupidly thought it would not cause too much commotion sacking the board members and knew it would ultimately remove Richo who was the one they wanted out.
I assume they were also not aware Richo could move on and collect 1.5 million in the process.
It’s not even a secret that Enriched was receiving payments from Wests Tigers.
Even if they were done at a fair and reasonable cost and not a largely inflated cost which had been strongly suggested, you just wouldn’t do it due to a conflict of interest.

Go back and read this post of yours. If you believe this was the HBG decision making process and they were not aware of the $1.5m payout (which you have been going on and on about to bag Richo), how could you possibly be arguing with people questioning HBG and wanting change.

This would just prove how bad the HBG Board are.

Just cannot understand your logic.

 

[weststigers]

Ok yes, I do actually apologise fully, too many attacks on people for the purpose of just causing drama in here all bleeds into one after a while. Yours just happened to read like it in the moment.

Happy to go along that you are in agreement with those who are blaming HBG for the problems at the moment.

Strongly agree HBG is the problem at the club. Was joking about the apology, but appreciate it anyway.

I think Vicious is the man you wanted.

 

[area52]

I think we all know it’s highly likely it was all a ploy to upset Richo.
My theory is they stupidly thought it would not cause too much commotion sacking the board members and knew it would ultimately remove Richo who was the one they wanted out.
I assume they were also not aware Richo could move on and collect 1.5 million in the process.
It’s not even a secret that Enriched was receiving payments from Wests Tigers.
Even if they were done at a fair and reasonable cost and not a largely inflated cost which had been strongly suggested, you just wouldn’t do it due to a conflict of interest.

The ashfield leagues club owners are hopeless mate unsure your angle in sticking up for them

There a decade of failure have you listen to marina go recent podcast where she expressly said all board member contribute is whinging about theres too much orange in the jersey?

Its a stain on the NRL that there is ownership like this continues in the game. She even made a comment big clubs in sydney individual with large control of the club wanted her gone just because she was female and they didn't want the NRL to make them have a female on their board. PVL is a toss

Every single board meeting bunch of old tossing sitting around complaining about a magpie and the colour orange can you imagine its very sad

 

[diedpretty]

Who's going to want to go for the Magpies.

Certainly not any kids.

26 years have past and almost no one cares.

The magpies Haven't been successful since the 1950s and been in a GF since 1963 or something.

They're gone mate.

This is all about the future

At least they still exist in some form> Its funny how i don't remember ever seeing any of this vitriol towards Wests Magpies when Balmain Tigers were fielding a team - there were no calls for a combined reserve team called Wests Tigers back then. If you are so pro Wests Tigers as you say you are why do you even care if Wests Magpies exists. Comes across as a giant sook that if Balmain Tigers don't exist anymore then Wests Magpies shouldn't exist either. Grow up and stop carrying on like a 2 yr old.

 

[Craegus]

Strongly agree HBG is the problem at the club. Was joking about the apology, but appreciate it anyway.

I think Vicious is the man you wanted.

Nah the apology was warranted.

Quite possibly, too many currently, all with seemingly the same motive or actions. Feels like the one person with multiple accounts at times.

 

[Vicious]

Strongly agree HBG is the problem at the club. Was joking about the apology, but appreciate it anyway.

I think Vicious is the man you wanted.

Don’t blame me