HBG, Independent Directors Sacked

Merlot said:
For a club to have their license revoked is as simple as not renewing it.
Don't toe the line - move on, That option is on the horizon for both hbg and the NRL
Click to expand...
...and if the NRL did that without significant justification..? I can only imagine the legal fight
cochise said:
It means that only 20 people have any real avenue to effect change at the club.
Click to expand...
And yet 2 voted members managed to gain so much influence that several of those 20 backed them up and supported them.
 
cdinoz007 said:
They are the 90% share holders. They are entitled to appoint and remove directors as they see fit. But if they are going to do that, they need to have a valid reason.

I am assuming with PVL stepping in, he wasnt convinced they had justification
Click to expand...
Do you actually think since HBG have been in control that the people they have appointed to oversee the running of the NRL team - not owners - have done a good job because the general consensus not just in the WTs community but the whole NRL community is that we are a basket case with plenty seeing us as the club to get turfed with in the competitive Sydney market if it comes to that.
You seem to have connections which makes it difficult to look at this from an objective point of view. The perception is that we are s@#t show and recent actions by the people entrusted to run the club have forced people like you to defend them once again after what most supporters were content after a reasonable year off the field, and improvement on.
 
Last edited:
cdinoz007 said:
Funny that an investigation initiated by TA and RW found what they wanted to be wrong, to indeed, be wrong
Click to expand...
It was very obvious what was wrong before the review.

HBG are running the club into the ground and it's been apparent for a long time .

The club finally starts to move forward and HBG blows it up again. That's why people are upset.

I don't care if it was TA and RW were leading the way. They were HBG and the HBG actions since they left haven't improved.
 
gallagher said:
Who put together the 7 people listed as the potential interim board?
Is Rick Wayde and Tony Andreacchio involved?
Click to expand...
That's the big question. That cannot be proved. But from an onlooker, I would say so.

Gary Barnier. Appointed and approved by TA for the Wests Tigers investigation

And the two ex board members (current board? Sorry, not sure if they are current) from Wests Cricket, where RW was lord and master for many years.
 
cdinoz007 said:
That's the big question. That cannot be proved. But from an onlooker, I would say so.

Gary Barnier. Appointed and approved by TA for the Wests Tigers investigation

And the two ex board members (current board? Sorry, not sure if they are current) from Wests Cricket, where RW was lord and master for many years.
Click to expand...

I don’t care too much who sits on the WT board, as long as Wests Tigers interests are their priority when appointed. Further to that, anyone that yells out Magpies at NRL matches has no place on either board.
 
cdinoz007 said:
...and if the NRL did that without significant justification..? I can only imagine the legal fight

And yet 2 voted members managed to gain so much influence that several of those 20 backed them up and supported them.
Click to expand...
You could stop trying 2b ,1 of d 2 , No 1 is listening to either of you
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Members online

Total: 966 (members: 1, guests: 965)
Back
Top