The Chad
Well-known member
They sacked the board... FACTThey sacked the board...
They made a statement that was contradictory, because hbg had 2 directors on the WT board.
They backflipped and reinstated the directors
They have made no statements since
Its a complete balls up.
If there was any merit to their claims, the independent directors wouldnt have been reinstated...
They made a statement that was contradictory, because hbg had 2 directors on the WT board. - Mostly factual. They did make a confusing statement. They did have 2 members on the board. The statement being contradictory in part doesn't make it less true however & has never been shown to be otherwise.
They backflipped and reinstated the directors - Partly factual. After the CEO resigned & PVL met both sides, the board members were invited to return.
They have made no statements since - Not a sign of incompetance, but factual.
Its a complete balls up.- Speculation
If there was any merit to their claims, the independent directors wouldnt have been reinstated... - Speculation.
For clarity- you MIGHT be right.
But also, just as possibly right- after the CEO left, after PVL met both sides, the HBG board might have been satisfied that the issue of where financial decisions were being made with no consultation with the financial backers of the club was resolved & they were happy to have the removed members return under these circumstances.
Where I will say HBG appear to have gone wrong, in my opinion, is that they reacted to what they felt was wrongdoing before getting all the facts themselves. But that is my speculation based on timelines. What that doesn't remove from the equation is if they had a point or not, which is quite possibly right & completely overlooked in 90% of this discussion.
