I Dont Get It....

All is not as it seems. The movie, The Matrix was pretty close to the mark in describing how this world functions - a false world within a real world. Howzat that for a conspiracy theory? :mrgreen:
 
The major thing here is,opinion,conspiracy,theory or truth..untill we have facts then that is what it is…

We really have to dissect fact from fiction and untill one way or another there is proof,then nobody will know and be no worse off...
 
CB, Col is entitled to his say,which ever way it is….

Let's not condem or judge others for their thoughts...wether humourous or serious.....
 
@TrueTiger said:
CB, Col is entitled to his say,which ever way it is….

Let's not condem or judge others for their thoughts...wether humourous or serious.....

Funny thing about freedom of expression, people are entitled to have a say on other peoples opinions.
 
@LaT said:
@GNR4LIFE said:
@Geo. said:
@AmericanHistoryX said:
Oswald was a patsy. Thats it.

_Posted using RoarFEED Android 1.1.7_

For Who"

**Pretty much will tell you all you need to know**

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=65N3eP2yvbQ

Jerry Kroth might have hit the nail on the head (along with his *cough* psychic immune system theory), but you should never limit yourself to one side of the argument.

Because thats all a conspiracy theory needs, is for people to only take in one point of view. No progress is made this way.

Are you sure you're not the one limiting yourself? The Oswald story, his whereabouts, his background etc, doesn't add up, it hasn't been ignored. Its been over 50 yrs and still a clear motive for why Oswald wanted him dead has still never been explained. What was the motive? And you saying ''he was a nut, that's all the motive he needed'' doesn't cut it, its weak, just like when you ignored the logic of why he waited till the motorcade proceeded down Elm street. Everyone that's been in a similar situation to Oswald has had a motive. Wilkes Booth was upset that Lincoln freed the slaves and was a confederate sympathiser, Mark Chapman wanted to acquire John Lennon's fame, John Hinckley wanted to impress Jodie Foster. Are they screwed up motives? Of course, but the fact remains that they had reasons for doing what they did, to this day it still hasn't been explained why he wanted JFK dead.

There were plenty of reasons people wanted JFK dead. He was prosecuting the mafia left, right and centre, or at least his brother was, people were still pissed over the Bay of Pigs fiasco, and perhaps the biggest reason, he was planning on pulling troops out of Vietnam as early as 64, meaning had he lived the Vietnam war would never have escalated. Instead the day after the assassination LBJ changed everything JFK had in place and the war went on for another 10-11 yrs.

James Teague was a bystander on the curb, who received a wound to his face from a bullet hitting the concrete beneath him. The angle that he was standing from the Presidents car, if shots had come from the Book Depository like has been said, then the bullet that wounded him missed the president by over 30 feet. Kind of a bad shot to miss by that much if that's where you're shooting from. Also odd, considering the common story reported was that only 3 shots were fired, two hitting Kennedy, and one hitting Connolly. Then there's the business of doctors treating Kennedy stating that the wound from his neck was an entry wound, not an exit wound, but I digress. That shot being failed to be taken as the motorcade was coming down Houston street, in which Oswald had a clear head shot of the President coming towards him is the kicker, why not take it then? Sorry, but ''oh you're trying to look for logic from a nutcase'', doesn't cut it as a response, its a weak answer, because everyone, no matter how deranged in that position will still try and give themselves the best possible opportunity. And in Oswald's case the best opportunity isn't to sit on your hands and wait till the President is moving away from you, at an angle and leaving you having to shoot through a tree, with a terrible rifle, and the target being over 200 feet away. It sounds more like a situation where you're waiting for someone to enter a crossfire. Did Jack Ruby really shoot Oswald because he didn't want to put Jackie through the agony of a trial? Gee what a nice guy.
 
The problem was we never got to find out whether Oswald had any motives GNR

That's where the problem lies

Dead men tell no tales
 
@AmericanHistoryX said:
9:36am January 1, 2015
QZ8501 was likely upside down when it crashed

Read more at http://www.9news.com.au/world/2015/01/01/09/36/qz8501-was-likely-upside-down-when-it-crashed#2G7sL7T54bWflWWS.99

Look I know we will probably never fully know the whole truth , but why would a pilot perform a manoeuvre that he knows carry huge risk ??
 
@happy tiger said:
@AmericanHistoryX said:
9:36am January 1, 2015
QZ8501 was likely upside down when it crashed

Read more at http://www.9news.com.au/world/2015/01/01/09/36/qz8501-was-likely-upside-down-when-it-crashed#2G7sL7T54bWflWWS.99

Look I know we will probably never fully know the whole truth , but why would a pilot perform a manoeuvre that he knows carry huge risk ??

have you seen the film FLIGHT - that should answer your question Happy.
 
@TrueTiger said:
The major thing here is,opinion,conspiracy,theory or truth..untill we have facts then that is what it is…

We really have to dissect fact from fiction and untill one way or another there is proof,then nobody will know and be no worse off...

a conspiracy is basically living in the past on a deeper level and most probably in the sub-conscious. life on the other hand moves the other way.
 
AHX,I always thought that a conspiracy was things were against you or your beliefs and although it is as you say in the subconscious,the believers think that it is happening day in day out and the end is nigh so to say..

People in the real world conspire against others all the time,such as in a job for eg,where someone is trying to get a promotion while backstabbing the one whose job they want..
\
\
I myself don't believe in conspiring against others,but call a spade a spade with facts..

I maybe completely off the track,but do you agree with some of what I say or can you put me on the right track…cheers mate....
 

Latest posts

Back
Top