Its all Millers fault

It is simple Farah did not want him at Halfback! Take a uppercut Robbie, you are getting to much of a big head.
 
Cmon, you surely aren't suggesting we are 13 points a game better off solely because of Miller? It probably had more to do with the fact that we had 7 or so of our other players in the side for those first few weeks.
Of course if people think a player is going to be a worldbeater straight out of NYC then they are kidding themselves but Miller just didn't really show anything in his opportunities TBH.
As for Adam Reynolds, he may have only scored 1 try for the Rabbits but he has created about 30 or 40 in his time in 1st grade I would guess, that is the difference.
 
it is all a matter of perspective, the more potential those making the decisions think a bloke has the more chances they get given to show it, that is pretty much everything in life not just footy.
they thought he deserved a crack, but not a long one. Imo I think that they got it right, I reckon he is just shy of NRL. If they stuck with him I'd have been ok with that as well
 
@Fade To Black said:
@innsaneink said:
Really….you guys saying four games = giving a guy a go, no idea.

If four games is all players get then 4/5ths of the entire palying base should be punted

Where are you getting "4 games" from??? He played more than that..

I don't consider the 5 x10 minute period at the back end of matches last year as "games".

Then again I am smarter than a potato.
 
@GNR4LIFE said:
So what happens if Brooks comes and shows very little in his first few games? should he be scrapped?

I'm going to stick the boot in massively

If only for the sake of balancing the drivel on here.
 
@Sataris said:
@Fade To Black said:
@innsaneink said:
Really….you guys saying four games = giving a guy a go, no idea.

If four games is all players get then 4/5ths of the entire palying base should be punted

Where are you getting "4 games" from??? He played more than that..

I don't consider the 5 x10 minute period at the back end of matches last year as "games".

Then again I am smarter than a potato.

Thank christ someone gets it.
I must be a turnip
 
I remember Miller playing up on the central coast last year, he filled in well, got dropped the next week for kicking the ball out on the full and not playing to Farah and Marshall's liking, but he played well that night. He then leads the under 20's to a grand final win. Potter says he will give him a fair go at half back this year after a good off season, but after a few games he is dropped. Big question is Why?
 
Why Gaz?

Same reason we went for Cashmere instead of Mason
Same reason we sacrificed the integrity of the club to get Moltzen back
Same reason we let a prop go that'll play origin this year
Same reason we brought back a defensive coach that couldnt tackle the kiddie x-word in the sunday papers
etc
etc
etc
 
@innsaneink said:
Why Gaz?

Same reason we went for Cashmere instead of Mason
Same reason we sacrificed the integrity of the club to get Moltzen back
Same reason we let a prop go that'll play origin this year
Same reason we brought back a defensive coach that couldnt tackle the kiddie x-word in the sunday papers
etc
etc
etc

spot on mate.
 
@Sataris said:
@Fade To Black said:
@innsaneink said:
Really….you guys saying four games = giving a guy a go, no idea.

If four games is all players get then 4/5ths of the entire palying base should be punted

Where are you getting "4 games" from??? He played more than that..

I don't consider the 5 x10 minute period at the back end of matches last year as "games".

Then again I am smarter than a potato.

Maybe you are. Speaking of potatoes, that bloke in your avatar looks like a dead-ringer for Mr Potato Head. Sign him up for Toy Story 4 ASAP! :wink:
 

Latest posts

Back
Top