avocadoontoast
Well-known member
Ivan’s position is totally untenable.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@ said:@ said:@ said:We would have sacked Ivan sooner or later anyhow. We've sacked plenty so can't whinge if one wants to quit.
That’s just a cop out
Why's that? Clubs punt players and coaches that have contracts all the time. Why are the clubs the only ones that can act this way?
@ said:@ said:@ said:We would have sacked Ivan sooner or later anyhow. We've sacked plenty so can't whinge if one wants to quit.
That’s just a cop out
Why's that? Clubs punt players and coaches that have contracts all the time. Why are the clubs the only ones that can act this way?
@ said:Reading between the lines on Pascoe's comments Ivan asked for a release yesterday. Great that we are saying No, but how are players going to show commitment to a coach that wanted to walk out on them.
@ said:Anybody got this article on the tele subscription
TIGERS READY FOR COURTROOM BRAWL OVER CLEARY
@ said:@ said:@ said:@ said:We would have sacked Ivan sooner or later anyhow. We've sacked plenty so can't whinge if one wants to quit.
That’s just a cop out
Why's that? Clubs punt players and coaches that have contracts all the time. Why are the clubs the only ones that can act this way?
Saying that we would’ve sacked Ivan anyway ..
You don’t know that !
@ said:@ said:@ said:I blame Sheens..
Looking back we should’ve kept Sheens and pissed off Farah and Marshall ….
Sheens was well past his use by date he stayed at the club far too long.A little bit of deja vu as well when Gould tried to sign him we panicked and signed him to an even longer contract which cost us in the long run.